1/9
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
New Federalism
Positive - Less federal interference in:
State and local affairs
Business (including world trade)
Finance
All aspects of people’s lives
Negative - Less:
Funding for state and local government projects
Regulation of business expansionism and greed
Control over foreign imports
Social welfare for the most needy
1982 State of the Union address
Since he came to power, the administration had:
Cut federal regulations almost in half, removing 23,000 pages from the Federal Register (which contains all federal regulations). This had 14,500 pages in 1960 and 87,000 when Reagan came to power
Helped to bring down the cost of petrol and heating fuel by deregulation
Created a federal strike force to combat government fraud and waste that had saved $2 billion in six months
Replaced federal agencies with private sector ones and federal employees with volunteers
Public image
Used everyday images when discussing change; small-scale savings were more real to the public
Discussed deregulation as if it was something he had instigated, but it was begun by Carter (airlines, drafted bills on deregulating trucking, the railways and some areas of finance)
Deregulation Legislation
29 January 1981 - EO to stop wage and price regulation
26 March 1981 - EO sets up the President’s Council on Integrity and Efficiency
8 April 1981 - EO sets up Presidential Advisory Committee on Federalism
17 July 1981 - Deregulation of controls on fuel prices
20 September 1982 - Bus Regulatory Reform Act deregulates bus services
15 October 1982 - Garn St Germain Depository Institution Act deregulates Savings and Loans institutions, allowing them to invest in more ventures and more freedom in mortgage lending
26 February 1983 - Deregulation of natural gas supplies
20 March 1984 - Shipping Act loosens regulations on US and foreign shipping
30 October 1984 - Cable Communications Act deregulates cable communications
22 October 1986 - Surface Freight Forwarder Deregulation Act Greater freedom for people working with various trucking companies to ‘bundle’ part loads to be carried by one of them
23 August 1988 - Foreign Trade and Competitiveness Act allows the president more rights in making trade treaties to benefit the USA
Problem of removing controls
Big companies bought out struggling small companies → rise in number of conglomerates
Businesses set their own standards of saftey lower than government regulators
Initially, deregulation brought lower prices through competition → as big businesses grew, it was more likely that several big businesses would ‘fix’ a price structure, so that they did not have to compete
Many businesses, from phone companies to airlines, cut services provided (or areas covered by their services) to maximise profit → rural areas suffered
The Savings and Loans collapse
1983 - Carter had put some banking deregulation in place and Reagan applied it to Savings and Loans institutions
Banks could offer high interest rates on savings
Good for savers
Bad for struggling businesses and people with long-term loans (who could not switch to the lower-interest loans)
Banks and S&Ls competed for custom
Positive:
Those who had savings and who were able to understand various offers benefited
Negative:
S&Ls run by people used to making safe investment -> before deregulation they had mostly provided mortgage loans at a regulated rate of interest
When they began to compete with banks, they made increasingly risky investments, lent at very low rates and offered high rates of saving
Many S&Ls failed through incompetence
1987 – The federal government was forced to pass the Competitive Equality in Banking Act
Provided money to cover the money lost by closed S&Ls
It was not enough
1988 – S&Ls had lost $10 billion
1989 – Property market collapsed
Bush had to sign the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (which bailed out some failing organisations, closed others and set up new federal regulators) -> cost $150 billion
Effects of policies on trade
The balance of world trade shifted against the USA, as the buying power of the dollar weakened
Foreign imports became cheaper
Imports of foreign goods rose
American companies lost business
The textile industry was particularly badly affected between 1980 and 1985
250 textile plants were forced to close
300,000 workers lost their jobs
The USA was a global borrower for the first time, rather than 'the world's banker'
American companies were being bought up by foreign companies
Rise of foreign imports as positive
Gave consumers more choice
Made the USA an attractive place for other countries to trade and invest in -> claimed Japanese investment was bringing money into the country, ignoring the fact that many Japanese reinvested their profits in Japan
A Japanese invasion?
1970s – Japanese companies began to increase car sales in the USA
The fuel crises led people to want cars that used as little fuel as possible – small Japanese cars rather than American 'gas-guzzlers'
1980s – Japanese firms began to establish themselves in the USA by:
Buying up a US firm entirely
Investing heavily in a US firm, usually a small one; the small company got start-up help, but was dependent on its Japanese stockholder
Running a company jointly with the American owners
Often chose parts of the country where federal government and US businesses were not investing, such as South Carolina
Did not result in much job creation -> in 1987, there were around 3 million Americans working for Japanese companies, but most were not in newly created jobs
However, they weren't unemployed because the company had gone under (which might have happened without investment)
Extent of reduction of big government
Congress agreed to deregulate oil prices, but blocked plans to remove regulations on environmental issues such as pollution and working conditions at nuclear power stations
State and local governments were unwilling to take over areas of government and projects under federal control
Did not want to pay for something that was otherwise federally funded
Unlike Carter's administration, Reagan did not introduce many new regulations
Congress persuaded Reagan to pass the Food Security Act in 1985
This gave help to federal farmers who were struggling with falling prices and the falling value of farmland
Reagan made it clear this help was an exception, forced on him by Congress
Legacy
By the time Bush came to power, people were less keen on deregulation and federal withdrawal from state and local affairs
Industry and banking deregulation had been running for long enough for people to see the negative effects of deregulation
It had become clear that many deregulated businesses were more interested in their own benefit than public benefit
Pre-deregulation aeroplanes flew to all over the USA and were often only half full
By 1989, the big companies had corrected the initial price fall from competition. Prices were high; planes flew to fewer places, less often and were tightly packed
Federal withdrawal from state and local programmes often meant the collapse of programmes through lack of funding
Poor rural areas found themselves at the back of the queue for communications services, transport services and basic maintenance such as road repair