Send a link to your students to track their progress
16 Terms
1
New cards
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
The principal judicial organ of the United Nations, headquartered in The Hague, composed of fifteen independent judges tasked with settling inter-state legal disputes and providing legal interpretations for the international community.
2
New cards
Contentious Case
A formal legal dispute between two or more consenting sovereign states submitted to the ICJ, which results in a final, legally binding judgment specifically for the involved parties.
3
New cards
Advisory Opinion
A formally non-binding, yet politically and legally influential, legal assessment issued by the ICJ at the request of an authorized UN body (such as the General Assembly) regarding a specific question of international law.
4
New cards
Article 34
The statutory provision stipulating that only sovereign states may be parties in contentious cases before the ICJ, explicitly excluding individuals, corporations, and non-governmental organizations from bringing cases.
5
New cards
Treaty-Based Jurisdiction
A mechanism of ICJ jurisdiction established when states sign an international convention containing a "compromissory clause" that automatically directs any future disputes regarding that specific treaty's interpretation to the Court.
6
New cards
Optional Clause Declaration
A mechanism under Article 36(2) of the ICJ Statute whereby a state formally and voluntarily declares in advance that it accepts the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court for qualifying future legal disputes, generally on a reciprocal basis.
7
New cards
Connally Amendment
A historically famous, self-serving reservation attached to the United States' former optional clause declaration, which controversially claimed the unilateral right of the US government to determine for itself whether a dispute fell within its domestic jurisdiction.
8
New cards
Ad Hoc Judge
A temporary judicial official appointed to the ICJ by a state party involved in a contentious case if that state does not already have a national serving among the Court's standard fifteen judges, reflecting the tension between judicial independence and national interests.
9
New cards
Provisional Measures
Temporary, interim protective orders issued by the ICJ (under Article 41) intended to preserve the rights of the parties and prevent irreversible harm or the deterioration of a dispute while a case is still pending final judgment.
10
New cards
Article 38
The defining statutory provision that establishes the hierarchical sources of international law the ICJ must apply to resolve disputes
11
New cards
Customary International Law
A primary source of international law derived from consistent, long-established state practice that is undertaken because states accept that the practice is legally obligatory.
12
New cards
General Principles of Law
Foundational legal concepts universally recognized across major domestic legal systems (such as equity and estoppel) that the ICJ can rely upon if treaty law and customary international law do not provide a sufficient answer.
13
New cards
Article 59
The statutory rule establishing that an ICJ judgment is binding only upon the specific parties involved and only in respect to that particular case, explicitly rejecting the doctrine of binding legal precedent in international law.
14
New cards
Article 94(2) of the UN Charter
The primary formal enforcement mechanism for the ICJ, which allows a winning state to appeal to the UN Security Council to take political or coercive measures if the losing party fails to comply with a final Court judgment.
15
New cards
Universal Jurisdiction
The controversial legal doctrine (central to the Yerodia case background) asserting that certain exceptionally egregious international crimes are so universally detrimental that any state may prosecute the perpetrators, regardless of where the crime occurred or the nationality of the accused.
16
New cards
Sovereign/Official Immunity
A protective doctrine of customary international law shielding certain high-ranking foreign government officials (such as incumbent foreign ministers) from being subjected to the criminal jurisdiction of another state's domestic courts in order to preserve international diplomatic relations.