1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
what is it
a system for dealing with offending behaviour which focuses on the rehabilitation of offenders through reconciliation with victims
enables offender to see the impact of their crime and serves to empower survivors by giving them a voice
emphasis
it switches the emphasis of the state (to enforce the law and punish) to the needs of the individual victim (to feel compensated in some way and come to terms with the crime)
less about retribution, more about reparation
what does it focus on
victim and their recovery
offender and their recovery/rehabilitation process
key features
supervised by a trained mediator
can be face to face or virtual via a web link
active rather than passive involvement of all parties in the process
other relevant community members may be present ie neighbours, family, friends - may wish to explain effects of the crime
what does the survivor do
survivor is given the opportunity to confront the offender and explain how the incident affected them
enables offender to comprehend the consequences of their actions, incl the emotional distress it caused
when may it occur
pre trial
alongside a prison sentence
alternative to prison (especially if the offender is young)
incentive to reduce sentence length
key elements - the 5 Rs
relationship - offender should feel accountable for their actions so relationship can be healed
respect - all should show it and achieved via active listening
responsibility - offender must take responsibility
repair - offender should try repair damage, victim but banish thoughts of revenge and punishment
reintegration - offender becomes part of community and is accepted
role with restitution
offender may make some financial restitution to the survivor that may reflect the psychological damage caused or the actual physical damage ie break-in
may involve offender repairing damaged property themselves
restorative justice council
RJC = an independent body whose role is to establish clear standards for the use of restorative justice, and to support survivors and specialist professionals in the field
advocates the use of restorative practice beyond dealing with crime
can be used in preventing and managing conflict in many areas incl schools, workplaces, hospitals, communities
evaluation
reduction in recidivism
needs of the survivor (& CP)
abusing the system
domestic violence
needs of survivor
meets the emotional needs of the survivor
shapland found 85% survivors were satisfied and 78% would recommend it - FtF meetings allow them to gain closure, express emotions and understand the offenders motives which helps emotional recovery
supports effectiveness and ethical value of restorative justice by prioritising survivor wellbeing
CP not survivor focused enough
wood found sessions often become offender focused aiming mainly at rehabilitation
may leave survivors feeling distressed or dissatisfied, especially when offender needs dominates theirs - 2% before study said it made them feel worse
weakens its claim of prioritising survivor needs
reduction in recidivism
can reduce it
been found offenders participating in FtF restorative justice were 14% less likely to reoffend - facing the victim may increase empathy, guilt and responsibility which reduces likelihood of future crime
supports it as an effective rehabilitation strategy
abusing the system
offenders may manipulate it for personal gain
been found they may participate to avoid punishment, reduce sentences or appear remorseful - if motivation is self interest rather than genuine remorse, behaviour change is unlikely
reduces LT effectiveness of it
domestic violence
not appropriate for all crimes ie domestic violence
NPCC does not support its use, arguing it may increase pressure on victims and reinforce power imbalances - victims may feel intimidated, coerced or unsafe especially when confronting abusive partners
suggests it should not be used for all crimes limiting application