1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
why statistics
estimating effect sizes
hypothesis testing
wildlife science is an increasingly quantitative discipline
thinking critically about information
a basic understanding of statistics will make us better citizens and scientists
summary data
start with _____
descriptive statistics ie means and measures of variance
make some plots
get a feel for the data
do before comparative or fancy statistics
difference tests
are these treatments different
t-test
analysis of variance
analysis of covariance
non-parametric equivalents
relational or association tests
is this response variable related to that predictor variable
correlation
linear regression
non-parametric equivalents
goodness of fit
how closely does observed data meet expectations
chi squared test
chi squared test
used when you wish to compare observed counts of a phenomenon within a category to expected counts within a category
often used in habitat selection analyses
chi squared response variable
counts of observations within a category
chi squared predictor variable
different categories
chi squared assumptions
both response and predictor variables are categorical
AMD vs non-AMD and EPT
clear cut vs old growth and high vs low biodiversity
all observations are independent
value of one obs does not affect the value of another
cells in the contingency table are mutually exclusive
observations can belong in only one cell, cannot apply to more than one
expected value of cells should be 5 or greater in at least 80% of cells, and no cell has an expected value <1
contingency table
tabulations of the number of observations within each category
null hypothesis
observed counts equal expected counts
t test
used when
you want to compare the mean of 1 population with a hypothetical mean
you wish to compare the mean of 2 populations
you wish to compare means of repeated measurements on the same units
t test response variable
measurements obtained from each distinct population
t test predictor variable
the different populations (treatment)
one sample t test
compare the mean of one sample to a hypothetical mean
test effects of mgt on average size of bass in a lake when you have an earlier mean size and a current (post-mgt) sample
two sample t test
compare the means of samples obtained from two different populations
species richness upstream and downstream of acid mine drainage
paired t test
compare the means of repeated measurements on the same sample; equivalent to 1 sample t test
effect of pollution on fish survival, “before-after”
t test assumptions
independence of observations
normality: both samples are approximately normally distributed
homogeneity of variances: both samples show similar variance
random sampling: samples were obtained through some form of random sampling methodology
t test null hypothesis
difference in means equal to some value (usually 0)
t test alternative hypothesis
difference in means not equal to some value (alternatively, 1-sided tests allow you to state > or < some value)
t test test statistic
t statistic
a function of your data and the basis for obtaining a p-value
t test p value
the probability your test statistic is greater than a critical value under repeated sampling
small = reject HO
critical values
for t test use t distribution
degrees of freedom
alpha a
compare t observed to t critical
tO > tc then reject null
to < tc then accept the null
analysis of variance
used when
we wish to compare the means of 2 or more populations
we wish to evaluate the influence of several factors simultaneously
we wish to include blocking variables and/or covariates or use more advanced hierarchical, nested, repeated measures
anova factor
a variable that represents 2 or more mutually exclusive categories
anova factor level
the difference values each factor can obtain