Rhetoric

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/36

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:25 PM on 10/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

37 Terms

1
New cards

Rhetoric

the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion

2
New cards

Counterpart to rhetoric?

dialectic

3
New cards

Dialectic

a method of reasoning and philosophical argument that uncovers the truth by examining the clash between opposing ideas or forces

4
New cards

Aristotle: three genres of rhetoric

Deliberative, Forensic , Epideictic

5
New cards

Deliberative

Future-oriented; urges an audience to do or not do something (policy or action). Typical question: What should we do?

6
New cards

Forensic (judicial)

Past-oriented; accuses or defends, usually addressing justice or injustice. Typical question: What happened, and was it right?

7
New cards

Epideictic

Present-oriented praise or blame; reinforces shared values and collective identity. Typical question: What deserves honor or condemnation?

8
New cards

Aristotle: three appeals

Ethos, Pathos, Logos

9
New cards

Ethos

argumentation through character and presentation

10
New cards

Pathos

argumentation through emotion

11
New cards

Logos

argumentation through logic ans reasoning

12
New cards

Aristotle: argument forms

Enthymeme, paradeigma

13
New cards

Enthymeme

A rhetorical deduction where part of the reasoning may remain unstated because the audience supplies a shared assumption. Example: “She understands working families—she grew up on a farm.” The missing premise is that such an upbringing confers understanding.

14
New cards

paradeigma

An inductive persuasive move from particular cases to a broader claim; Aristotle discusses historical examples and invented comparisons/fables

15
New cards

Parallelism/parisons

Repeated grammatical pattern: “To serve, to build, to lead.” Provides rhythm, clarity and coherence

16
New cards

Anecdote

Brief illustrative story about a person/event. Humanizes abstract policies; adds identification.

17
New cards

Principle of chairty

Interpret an opposing argument in its strongest reasonable form before criticizing it.

18
New cards

Evidence quality

Ask: Is the source credible? Are terms defined? Is evidence relevant, representative, accurate, sufficient, and current for the claim? Are causation and correlation confused?

19
New cards

Ad hominem

Attacking a person instead of addressing their argument.

20
New cards

Straw man

Distorting the opposing claim into an easier position to refute.

21
New cards

False dilemma

Presenting only two options when more are available.

22
New cards

Hasty generalization

Drawing a broad conclusion from too few or unrepresentative examples.

23
New cards

False cause

Assuming that one event caused another without adequate support.

24
New cards

Loaded language

Using emotionally charged terms to tilt judgment before argument or evidence is supplied.

25
New cards

Three character-based reasons for trust

good sense, good character/excellence, and goodwill

26
New cards

Anger

involves a painful desire for revenge in response to perceived slight

27
New cards

parallels/fables

they make a general argument understandable through particular cases.

28
New cards

Socratic questioning

challenge settled beliefs by asking clarifying questions, seeking justification, and testing consistency rather than simply accepting authority.

29
New cards

Reflective thinking

scientific method

30
New cards

Metonymy

Uses an associated thing to stand for another. Bodily effects such as blood and sweat stand for sacrifice and labor

31
New cards

Chiasmus

Reverses corresponding elements across clauses. The reversal creates a compact, memorable formulation and can reframe apparent setbacks.

32
New cards

John Stuart Mill -

Even true belief can become “dead dogma” if it is never challenged. Discussing objections helps people understand WHY they believe it

33
New cards

Joel Best, Damned Lies and Statistics, “Soft Facts”

Four major routes to problematic statistics: guessing, questionable definitions, flawed measurements, and weak sampling

34
New cards

Martha Nussbaum, “Emotions and Law”

Emotions play real roles in legal judgment. They are not automatically irrelevant, irrational impulses; their appropriateness may be evaluated based on beliefs, circumstances, and evidence. Rememeber wife kills sleeping husband who abused her. Were the circumstances relevant, or appeal to emotion?

35
New cards

Jonathan Charteris-Black,

Political speeches are often collaboratively written, but speakers retain accountability; the speech must align with their perceived political identity. Speechwriting creates questions of authenticity and trust.

36
New cards

American political speechwriting

as appeals to founding ideals, collective “we,” national identity, stories of ordinary people, hope, and calls to action. Reframe tragedies to unite

37
New cards

Heuristic

mental shortcuts humans use to come to quick decisions