1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Rhetoric
the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion
Counterpart to rhetoric?
dialectic
Dialectic
a method of reasoning and philosophical argument that uncovers the truth by examining the clash between opposing ideas or forces
Aristotle: three genres of rhetoric
Deliberative, Forensic , Epideictic
Deliberative
Future-oriented; urges an audience to do or not do something (policy or action). Typical question: What should we do?
Forensic (judicial)
Past-oriented; accuses or defends, usually addressing justice or injustice. Typical question: What happened, and was it right?
Epideictic
Present-oriented praise or blame; reinforces shared values and collective identity. Typical question: What deserves honor or condemnation?
Aristotle: three appeals
Ethos, Pathos, Logos
Ethos
argumentation through character and presentation
Pathos
argumentation through emotion
Logos
argumentation through logic ans reasoning
Aristotle: argument forms
Enthymeme, paradeigma
Enthymeme
A rhetorical deduction where part of the reasoning may remain unstated because the audience supplies a shared assumption. Example: “She understands working families—she grew up on a farm.” The missing premise is that such an upbringing confers understanding.
paradeigma
An inductive persuasive move from particular cases to a broader claim; Aristotle discusses historical examples and invented comparisons/fables
Parallelism/parisons
Repeated grammatical pattern: “To serve, to build, to lead.” Provides rhythm, clarity and coherence
Anecdote
Brief illustrative story about a person/event. Humanizes abstract policies; adds identification.
Principle of chairty
Interpret an opposing argument in its strongest reasonable form before criticizing it.
Evidence quality
Ask: Is the source credible? Are terms defined? Is evidence relevant, representative, accurate, sufficient, and current for the claim? Are causation and correlation confused?
Ad hominem
Attacking a person instead of addressing their argument.
Straw man
Distorting the opposing claim into an easier position to refute.
False dilemma
Presenting only two options when more are available.
Hasty generalization
Drawing a broad conclusion from too few or unrepresentative examples.
False cause
Assuming that one event caused another without adequate support.
Loaded language
Using emotionally charged terms to tilt judgment before argument or evidence is supplied.
Three character-based reasons for trust
good sense, good character/excellence, and goodwill
Anger
involves a painful desire for revenge in response to perceived slight
parallels/fables
they make a general argument understandable through particular cases.
Socratic questioning
challenge settled beliefs by asking clarifying questions, seeking justification, and testing consistency rather than simply accepting authority.
Reflective thinking
scientific method
Metonymy
Uses an associated thing to stand for another. Bodily effects such as blood and sweat stand for sacrifice and labor
Chiasmus
Reverses corresponding elements across clauses. The reversal creates a compact, memorable formulation and can reframe apparent setbacks.
John Stuart Mill -
Even true belief can become “dead dogma” if it is never challenged. Discussing objections helps people understand WHY they believe it
Joel Best, Damned Lies and Statistics, “Soft Facts”
Four major routes to problematic statistics: guessing, questionable definitions, flawed measurements, and weak sampling
Martha Nussbaum, “Emotions and Law”
Emotions play real roles in legal judgment. They are not automatically irrelevant, irrational impulses; their appropriateness may be evaluated based on beliefs, circumstances, and evidence. Rememeber wife kills sleeping husband who abused her. Were the circumstances relevant, or appeal to emotion?
Jonathan Charteris-Black,
Political speeches are often collaboratively written, but speakers retain accountability; the speech must align with their perceived political identity. Speechwriting creates questions of authenticity and trust.
American political speechwriting
as appeals to founding ideals, collective “we,” national identity, stories of ordinary people, hope, and calls to action. Reframe tragedies to unite
Heuristic
mental shortcuts humans use to come to quick decisions