motor learning exam 2

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/62

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

63 Terms

1
New cards

does action preparation require time

yes

2
New cards

Hicks Law

RT increases when number of choices increases (logarithmically)

3
New cards

When the predictability of one of the possible choices increases, RT

decreases

4
New cards

Cost Benefit Trade Off -

choosing to prep for one possible action can make you faster if that action happens but slower if a different action happens

5
New cards

advance informatin

info before performing an actin

6
New cards

SR is

stimulus respinse compatability

7
New cards

how compatable your responses are to the stimulus; physical relatinship between stimulus and response choices; includes spatial arrangemnt of stimuli and limb movements required to respond to them

S-R compatability

8
New cards

RT will be faster when

SR are move compatable

9
New cards

stroop effect

knowt flashcard image
10
New cards

foreperiod

between warning signal and go signal

11
New cards

constant foreperiod does what to RT

Decreases

12
New cards

why does inconsistant forperiod lengthen RT

anticipation

13
New cards

as movement complexity increases waht happens to RT

increases

14
New cards

as movement requires more accuracy what happens to preperation time required

increases

15
New cards

RT ___ when accuracy demands increase

increases

16
New cards

repitition ___ RT

decreases

17
New cards

PRP stands for

psychological refractory period

18
New cards

delay of response to the second stimulus

PRP

19
New cards

when two signals happen close together, the response to the second signal is __

delayed

20
New cards

PRP happens because

response selection demands (how difficult it is to figure out which response matches each signal) and timing of response initiation (how close together two responsees need to happen)

21
New cards

reaction to second signal is slower because your brain is still processing the first signal

PRP

22
New cards

alertness of the performer, vigilance, and attention focused on the signal instead of the movement all

influence preperation

23
New cards

long term maitinence of alertness

vigilance ( RT increases (bad) as the person has to maintain alert longer)

24
New cards

fractionated RT and anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) occur during

preparation

25
New cards

Fractionated RT

breaks RT down into smaller parts — premotor time and motor time — RT increases because premotor time increases for complex movements

26
New cards

activation of muscles prior to execution of action

APAs, anticipatory postural adjustments

27
New cards

events that occur during prep

limb performance characteristics, object control characteristics

28
New cards

movement direction, mvmt trajectory, prep in advance

limb performance characteristics

29
New cards

force control, end state comfort control, hands initial spatial position based on what will be its final spatial position

object control characteristics

30
New cards

rituals help prepare

timing of upcoming movements

31
New cards

attention is a

limited capacity resource

32
New cards

several characteristics associated with perceptual, cognitive, and motor activities that establish limits to our performance of motor skills, relates to consciousness or awareness, limits influence performance when we do more than one activity at the same time, according to scientisstsa

attention

33
New cards

more than one activity at the same time performance limits because of

attention

34
New cards

performing multiple tasks at once:

sometimes no difficulties sometimes difficulties

35
New cards

limits of multiple tasks at once because of

attention limits limiting performance

36
New cards

attention theory: filter or bottleneck

multitasking hard because we cant serially process multiple stimuli

37
New cards

attention theory: attention-capacity theory

we have one central course of attention resources and all activities compete to get it

38
New cards

attention theory: kahneman’s

attention is a cognitive effort, and there is a single course of mental resources from which humans derive cognitive effort which has flexible capacity

39
New cards

central resource theories:

kahneman’s and attention capacity

40
New cards

kahnemans: attention capacity available for specific performance situation si dependnet on __

performers arousal

41
New cards

Kahnemans 3 rules fo allocating attention

  1. allocate attention to ensure completion of at least one task

  2. involuntary attention to at least two types of characteristics of events

  3. momentary intentions - allocate attention according to performers specific attention


42
New cards

enduring despositions:

event is novel for the situation and meaningful to us personally

43
New cards

multiple resource theory is __ to central resource thoery

alternative/opposite

44
New cards

multiple sources need

input output modalities, stages of info processing, codes of processing info

45
New cards

success in multitasking depends on whether those tasks demand our attention from a common or different resources

multiple resource theory

46
New cards

dual task procduce for assessing attention demands

determines attention demands and characteristics of stim of 2 diff tasks, primary task is task of int, secondary tasi is to help make infrences about the attention demands of the primary task,

47
New cards

the secondary task acts as a

tool to reveal how much attention the primary task requires

48
New cards
49
New cards

attentional focus

directs attention to specific aspects of our performance environment

50
New cards

types of attentional focus

width, direction, attention switching

51
New cards

action effect hypothesis

proposes actions are best planned and controlled by their intended effects

52
New cards

internal focus

foruc on your body movement - movement itself

53
New cards

external focus

movement effects, focus on outcome or effect of your movement

54
New cards

action effect hypothesis

focusing on the results is more effective

55
New cards

common coding

actions and their intended perceptual effects are linked in planning

56
New cards

automaticy

performance of a skill with little/no demand on attention capacity

57
New cards

are different brain areas active when tasks are automized

yes

58
New cards

prep for voluntary movement takes

time

59
New cards

minimum time for system to prep for action

reaction time

60
New cards

as the predictability of 1 possible choice increases

reaction time decreases

61
New cards

cost is

higher RT

62
New cards

benefit is

lower RT

63
New cards

prepping an actin