1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Thesis
AI Makes direct democracy by citizens (initiatives and referendums) cheaper, faster, and more frequent. It also erodes the conditions that make it legitimate, turning a “safety valve” into an engine of plebiscitarian instability
3 Domains AI Transforms (C-M-P)
creation/agenda setting (LLMs draft airtight laws)
mobilization (voter targeting, signature gathering)
persuasion (personalized messages for each voter)
3 Historical Barriers AI Removers
expertise
logistics
persuasion
3 Pillars of legitimacy AI erodes (D-T-C)
Deliberation
Civil society
Trust
2 Futures of democracy with AI
Automated plebiscites
Augmented deliberation
Slovakia 2023
Deepfake audio of a liberal candidate discussing vote-rigging
India 2024
AI-powered robocalls were used in efforts to deliver hyper-personalized messages to voters
Link to textbook
Rousseau’s direct democracy & general will - can the general will be “engineered“
Supports Mill - deliberation and representation over plebiscites
Plato - masses swayed by persuasion rather than knowledge