Constitutional Law and Supreme Court Cases Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/49

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering the structural foundations of the US Constitution, essential legal terminology, and major Supreme Court decisions outlined in the midterm study notes.

50 Terms

1
New cards

Constitution of the United States

The foundational legal framework completed at the Constitutional Convention on September 17, 1787, replacing the Articles of Confederation; its purpose is to divide government into three branches, limit government powers, and establish checks and balances.

2
New cards

Preamble to the Constitution

The opening statement explaining why the Constitution exists, asserting that government authority originates from 'We the people' to establish justice and form a more perfect union.

3
New cards

Article 1

The section of the Constitution establishing the legislative branch (Congress, consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate) to make federal laws, requiring a minimum age of 25 for House members.

4
New cards

Commerce Clause

A provision in Article 1 granting Congress the authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the states.

5
New cards

Necessary and Proper Clause

A provision in Article 1 empowering Congress to make all laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out its constitutional powers.

6
New cards

Article 2

The section of the Constitution establishing the executive branch, led by the President (minimum age 35) whose primary job is to execute federal laws, act as Commander in Chief, appoint federal officers, make treaties, and veto legislation.

7
New cards

Article 3

The section of the Constitution establishing the judicial branch, consisting of one Supreme Court and lower federal courts, dealing with jurisdiction, judicial review, and political questions.

8
New cards

Article 5

The section outlining the amendment process, requiring a 23\frac{2}{3} vote in Congress to propose an amendment and ratification by 34\frac{3}{4} of the states.

9
New cards

Supremacy Clause

A clause in Article 6 establishing that the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land, meaning federal law prevails when federal and state laws conflict.

10
New cards

Article 7

The section specifying the ratification procedure, declaring that the Constitution would become effective after ratification by 9 states.

11
New cards

10th Amendment

The constitutional amendment establishing federalism by reserving powers not delegated to the federal government to the states or to the people.

12
New cards

Establishment Clause

A clause within the 1st Amendment stating that the government cannot establish an official religion.

13
New cards

Free Exercise Clause

A clause within the 1st Amendment that protects religious practices from government interference.

14
New cards

5th Amendment

An amendment protecting due process rights, prohibiting self-incrimination ('pleading the fifth'), requiring a grand jury for serious crimes, and barring double jeopardy.

15
New cards

District Court

The trial court level of the federal court system where cases are first heard, witnesses testify, evidence is introduced, and facts are determined.

16
New cards

Court of Appeals

The intermediate federal court level where a panel of 3 judges reviews decisions made by district courts without retrying the whole case.

17
New cards

Original Jurisdiction

The authority of a court to hear and decide a legal case first, before any other court reviews it.

18
New cards

Appellate Jurisdiction

The power of a court to review a decision made by a lower court to verify that the law was applied correctly.

19
New cards

Writ of Mandamus

A formal court order commanding a government official to perform a specified legal duty.

20
New cards

Writ of Habeas Corpus

A court order requiring the government to justify why a person is being detained in order to prevent unlawful imprisonment.

21
New cards

Justiciable

A standard indicating that an issue is appropriate for a court to decide rather than belonging to a different branch of government.

22
New cards

Writ of Certiorari

A formal order through which the Supreme Court agrees to review a lower court's decision, selectively chosen at the Court's discretion.

23
New cards

Injunction

A court order requiring an individual or entity to do or refrain from doing a specific action.

24
New cards

Indictment

A formal accusation declaring that a person has committed a crime.

25
New cards

En Banc

A rehearing of an important legal case by a large group of active appellate judges rather than by a typical small panel.

26
New cards

Subpoena

A legal document that compels an individual to testify or produce physical evidence.

27
New cards

Stare Decisis

The legal doctrine of adhering to precedents set by earlier court rulings, though such precedents can be overruled.

28
New cards

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

The landmark ruling authored by Chief Justice John Marshall establishing judicial review, holding that the Constitution is higher than federal statutes and that the Supreme Court lacked original jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus for Marbury's commission.

29
New cards

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816)

A decision authored by Justice Story affirming that the Supreme Court has the authority to review state court decisions that involve federal law or the US Constitution under the Supremacy Clause.

30
New cards

Walter Nixon v. US (1993)

A case authored by Chief Justice Rehnquist holding that challenges to the Senate's impeachment trial procedures are nonjusticiable political questions committed to the Senate.

31
New cards

Ex parte McCardle (1869)

A case authored by Chief Justice Salmon Chase confirming that Congress possesses constitutional authority under the Exceptions Clause to alter and withdraw the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

32
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

A decision authored by Chief Justice Marshall establishing that Congress has implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause to establish a national bank, and that Maryland cannot tax it pursuant to the Supremacy Clause.

33
New cards

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

A ruling authored by Chief Justice Marshall defining interstate commerce to encompass commercial navigation and affirming that federal licensing powers override state-granted monopolies.

34
New cards

Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918)

A ruling authored by Justice Day striking down a federal child labor law, reasoning that manufacturing and child labor are purely local matters rather than interstate commerce.

35
New cards

US v. Darby (1941)

A ruling authored by Justice Harlan upholding the Fair Labor Standards Act and overruling Hammer v. Dagenhart, establishing that Congress can regulate intrastate labor conditions connected to interstate commerce.

36
New cards

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US (1964)

A ruling authored by Justice Clark establishing that Congress can use the Commerce Clause to prohibit racial discrimination in places of public accommodation when private discrimination impedes interstate travel.

37
New cards

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

A ruling authored by Justice Clark determining that Congress can prohibit racial discrimination at local restaurants like Ollie's BBQ under the Commerce Clause because discrimination discourages travel and the restaurant's food traveled through interstate commerce.

38
New cards

US v. Morrison (2000)

A decision authored by Chief Justice Rehnquist holding that Congress cannot regulate noneconomic, local criminal conduct under the Commerce Clause, thereby invalidating civil remedy provisions of the Violence Against Women Act.

39
New cards

Gonzales v. Raich (2005)

A ruling authored by Justice Stevens holding that Congress can regulate locally grown, non-commercial medical marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act because it affects the larger national market.

40
New cards

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)

A ruling authored by Justice Black holding that President Truman lacked authority to seize private steel mills without statutory authorization from Congress, featuring Justice Jackson's three-part framework regarding presidential authority.

41
New cards

INS v. Chadha (1983)

A decision authored by Chief Justice Burger ruling the one-house legislative veto unconstitutional for violating the constitutional requirements of bicameral passage and presentment to the President.

42
New cards

Morrison v. Olson (1988)

A case authored by Chief Justice Rehnquist upholding the independent counsel system, finding that Congress can place limits on the President's ability to remove certain executive officers without violating the separation of powers.

43
New cards

Clinton v. NYC (1998)

A decision authored by Justice Stevens invalidating the Line Item Veto Act, holding that the Constitution requires the President to approve or reject a bill in its entirety rather than amending passed legislation.

44
New cards

Trump v. US (2024)

A decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts outlining a three-tier framework for presidential criminal immunity: absolute immunity for basic constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for private, unofficial acts.

45
New cards

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

A ruling authored by Justice Douglas finding that various guarantees in the Bill of Rights create zones of privacy, protecting the constitutional right of married couples to use contraception.

46
New cards

Roe v. Wade (1973)

A landmark case authored by Justice Blackmun holding that the 14th Amendment's liberty and privacy protections encompass a woman's decision to have an abortion, applying strict scrutiny across a trimester framework.

47
New cards

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022)

A decision authored by Justice Alito overruling Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, holding that the US Constitution does not protect a right to abortion and returning authority to regulate abortion to the states.

48
New cards

Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)

A ruling authored by Chief Justice Rehnquist establishing that unlisted rights under substantive due process must be deeply rooted in American history and tradition, concluding there is no fundamental constitutional right to assisted suicide.

49
New cards

Bowers v. Hardwick (1986)

A decision authored by Justice White holding that the Constitution does not confer a fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy because such conduct is not deeply rooted in history and tradition, accepting moral disapproval as state justification.

50
New cards

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

A ruling authored by Justice Kennedy that explicitly overruled Bowers v. Hardwick, holding that adult consensual sexual conduct in private is protected under the liberty component of the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause.