3. Application Lab: Discrimination, Harassment, Accommodation and Retaliation

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/3

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Employee Relations Exam 1

Last updated 10:56 PM on 10/9/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

4 Terms

1
New cards

Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989)

Statute and issue

Title VII: sex discrimination through gender stereotyping


What was decided

Stereotyping comments can be evidence of illegal sex discrimination, even alongside real performance concerns. The firm couldn't prove it would have made the same call anyway.

2
New cards

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar (2013)

Statute and issue

Title VII: retaliation


What was decided

The Supreme Court (5-4) held that retaliation claims require the tougher but-for standard.

3
New cards

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores East (Marlo Spaeth)

Statute and issue

ADA: failure to accommodate


What was decided

A jury found Walmart liable, and the 7th Circuit affirmed in 2024. Federal damages caps cut the $125 million punitive award to the $300,000 cap; back pay and reinstatement were also ordered.

4
New cards

Meadows v. NCR Corp. (7th Cir., 2023)

Statute and issue

FLSA: off-the-clock work


What was decided

The 7th Circuit reversed the jury: an employer may condition its voluntary practice of paying for extra time on the employee actually recording it.