1/164
Chapters 5, 6, 7, and Open Science
Process of remembering
acquisition
storage
retrieval
Acquisition of a memory
process of gaining information and placing it into a memory
Storage of a memory
holding the information in a memory
Retrieval of a memory
locating the information in storage and bringing it to active use
remembering
The modal model of information processing
describes how information is moved around the brain
sensory memory
short-term memory
long-term memory
Sensory memory
holds raw memory of sensory inputs for around 1 second
feels like you have access to everything you can see but does not last long
very brief, mostly fades away immediately
Short-term memory
passive storage block
space where we decide to store something or let it go
capacity of 7 ± 2
easier to store in short-term but more fragile and easier to loose
need to rehearse to keep in there
Maintence
repeating information over and over again to make sure it stays in short-term memory
Long-term memory
memories that have been deeply encoded and stored
takes lots of effort to get here
capacity is unlimited
very stable
Retrieval
moment where we take a memory from long-term memory and bring it to our working memory to actively think about it
Update to short-term memory
short-term memory is not seen as a space where memories are moved
seen as an activated state memory already inside long-term memory
changed to working memory
Working memory
brains temporary space used to hold, organize, and use information
limited capacity
large individual differences in capacity
fragile and easily disrupted
needed for coordinating multiple pieces of information
Differences between working and long-term memory
size
ease of entry
ease of retrieval
fragility
Relationship between serial position and likelihood of recall
more likely to recall when at the start or end
primacy effect
recency effect
Primacy effect
more likely to remember first few words on a list
extra attention to initial words
have lots of energy/focus that you can put toward
not competing with other words to get focus
more chance for rehearsal
more chance to be encoded into long-term memory
Recency effect
more likely to remember the last few words on a list
just heard them so you are still actively thinking about them
still active in working memory
How to show that working memory and long-term memory are separate
make them do something in between showing them and asking them to recall
distracting working memory
when working memory is busy doing something else, recency effect goes away
slow presentation down and give more time to process between things
more time for rehearsal and encoding into long-term memory
primacy effect increases
Measuring capacity of working memory
the digit span task
the operation/reading span task
The digit span task
hear series of digits and repeat them back right away
do this with larger sequences until you start to make errors
average capacity = 7 ± 2 items
Chunking
groups individual info into meaningful units to make it easier to remember lots of things
flexible, variable, influenced by prior knowledge, and task dependent
1, 2, 6, 7
group as 12, 67 to make it easier to remember
or us a meaningful association like 12 is my birthday so i will put 1, 2 together
Chase and Ericsson - 1982
tested people on numbers and how they remembered them
track and field fan remembered 3, 4, 9, 2 as 3 minutes and 49.2 seconds
used meaningful knowledge to remember not just basic numbers in a row
The operational/reading span task
to measure working memory capacity by testing how well a person can hold information in their head which doing a distracting task at the same time
read a series of sentences
continue to do a task afterwards
say all the final words of the sentence in order
measures active processing
Active processing
how memory operates when your brain is actively working
Why the operation/reading span task is useful
shows us how large people's working memory capacity are
people who do better on this task normally perform better on tasks needing coordination of information
The working memory system
Executive control processes
articulatory rehearsal loop
subvocalization
phonological buffer
visuospatial buffer
episodic buffer
Executive control process
controls what you are currently doing/thinking about
selection and sequence of thoughts
what is important right now
what resources are needed
how much attention is required
Articulatory rehearsal loop
subvocalization
phonological buffer
can rely on this sub-process
takes few resources and lets executive control focus on the primary task
Subvocalization
silent speech
moment when you are repeating stuff internally in your head
Phonological buffer
passive storage of sound
moment when you prepare to repeat the stuff in your head again
Issues with articulatory rehearsal loop
sound alike errors
concurrent articulation task/articulatory suppression
Sound alike errors
may say something so much over and over again that you make change it to a word/thing that sounds similar to it
sounds morph together
Concurrent articulation task
hard to rehearse something in your head when you are doing saying something else and your energy has to go towards that
during working memory task say something out loud dedededede
takes the resources needed for speech production and doesn’t allow for rehearsal loop in head
working memory capacity drops from 7-9 to 5-6
Visuospatial buffer
stores visual materials as mental images
short-term memory for visual info
also called visuospatial sketchpad
Episodic buffer
helps organize things into a chronological sequence
what order are things happening in?
is this all apart of one event or multiple separate events?
Working memory depending on modality
uses different processes depending on how the task is done
deaf since birth does not rely on inner ear but on inner hand
deaf since birth does not have sound alike errors but look alike errors with
working memory is disrupted if moving their hands
Visual working memory
maintaining information in mind’s eye without rehearsal
limited capacity
can only hold for so long
lots of individual differences
How to minimize the contribution of rehearsal to visual working memory
make the visual stimuli harder to label
slight changes in shades
articulatory suppression
tying us verbal resources to block the ability to repeat in your head
Individual differences in visual working memory capacity
driven by how good you can keep the unwanted information out
stable over time
attention filtering
Attention filtering
using attentional focus to selectively encode relevant items
ability to focus on the visual info relevant to you and ignore the irrelevant info
strength decreases as you age
High performers at attentional filtering
keep relevant info
ignore distractors
Low performers at attentional filtering
keep relevant info and irrelevant info
creates too much info to work with
ADHD and attentional filtering
not good at filtering
remembers all info and focuses on all of it
cannot filter out irrelevant info
Contralateral delay activity (CDA)
event-related EEG component
used to measure how many items someone is holding in visual working memory
measures amplitude spike in CDA
goes up by how many items you are holding
Transferring visual info into long-term memory
requires lots of effort
shown an image for the first time and there is a big spike in CDA
in working memory
the 8th time in a row has a much lower spike in CDA
has been transferred to long-term memory and we can no longer measure CDA
Transferring non-visual information into long-term memory
needs a lot of effort
more you rehearse something, the more likely it will be moved to long-term memory
more attention you can devote to it, the better you can remember it
Types of rehearsal
maintenance rehearsal
relational/elaborative rehearsal
Maintenance rehearsal
focus on items themselves
thinking about them over and over again
good to remember in short-term but not likely they get moved to long-term
Relational/elaborative rehearsal
focus on what the items mean and how they relate to one another
relating to events that you have experienced
much greater long-term benefits
Exposure does not = strong memory
repeated exposure is not enough to create a precise long-term memory encoding
can recognize a lot of things but to actually draw them yourself and create an accurate drawing is very hard
see things a lot but have not paid enough attention to encode a detailed reliable description of it
Intentional learning
being told to learn/remember something for a test
does not = good memory
Unintentional learning
shallow processing
does the word contain the letter e?
how many letters does it contain?
deep processing
how pleasant is this word?
needed to think about the meaning of the word
deeply engaging with material can create better memory even when not trying to learn something
How deeper connections helps processing
more connections a memory has, the more pathways to retrieve it
easier to retrieve it
having no connections to a word won’t let us get into the web of memories
Mnemonic strategies
techniques to improve memory
acronyms
mental imagery
peg-word system
Acronyms
form of chunking
each letter helps connect to another word
ROYGBIV = colors of the rainbow
Mental imagery
creating a mental image connecting things
creates verbal-visual traces that are stronger than repetition alone
memory palace
Memory palace
thinking about a space that you know well
attaching pieces of information to items in the space
when you think about an item you will think about the info attached
helps remember lots of information
Understanding and it’s role on memory
improves memory
remember information better and more accurately when you understand it
Patient H.M.
got surgery to remove hippocampus to help with seizures
lost ability to form new memories
could remember old memories
kept implict memory
could learn new things but not remember learning something
something would feel familiar but not know why
shows us that there are different types of memories
could hold stuff in working memory but as soon as he switched to focusing on something else it would fall out and he would have no idea of it ever being there
Korsakoff patients
result of severe alcohol use
cannot form new implicit memories
good for studying difference between implicit and explicit memory
can show improvement in a task but have no memory of every doing it
Explicit memory
conscious and direct memory
know what happened and when it happened
can remember doing something
recall
recognition
Implicit memory
memory/learning that is demonstrated without conscious awareness
show effects from a previous experience but not have a memory of the experience
Mirror drawing test
draw an image on a piece of paper but you can only see it in the mirror
improvements can be seen in people with and without explicit memory
even if they don’t remember ever doing the task before
Recall
reproducing something from memory
needs deep memory trace
needs many connections in memory
Recognition
being able to see something and match it to information that we know
able to identify something as familiar when you see it
weaker memory trace
not as many connections needed in memory
Context-dependent learning
learning is preparation for the retrieval of information
the context that something is learned influences the connections with that memory
think about things you are experiencing to remember something
Scuba divers experiment
participants learned stuff on land and in water
then were tested on land and in water
memory was best when learned context and tested context was the same
different environments create different memory connections
Context reinstatement
easier to remember something if you recreate the physical, environment, and mental context where you learned something
being in the same space or thinking about the same space both produce the same retrieval benefit
The memory network
each item is a node
nodes are tied to each other through associative links
when a node is activated, it spread through the network to other linked nodes
when it gets enough activation to pass the threshold it is brought into working memory
Subthreshold activation
nodes that are not as deeply connected to the rest of connection map
will not be activated
Multiple subthreshold activation
multiple subthreshold activations can add together to bring something to summation even when it is not fully activated
Retrieval cues
provides more activation pathways to target memory
like a hint
makes it easier to retrieve
different clues provide different pathways to the target
Lexical decision task
shown string of letters
asked if they are real words or not
time it takes to make a decision shows how quickly they can look up words
Semantic priming
recognizing a word happens faster when it is after a semantically related word
when you see something the node is activated and the brain automatically spreads activation to nearby nodes
doctor and nurse are related so they have a faster response
bird and desk are not related so they have a slower response
Time cost
how long it takes to move over from one network to another and activate a new node
Familiarity
you know something
but do not know why you know it
Source memory
you know something
and you know why you know it
Remember judgments
conscious recollection
intact source memory
accurate familiarity
greater activation of the hippocampus
more accurate than knowing
Know judgments
not intact source memory
accurate familiarity
greater activation of the rhinal cortex
less accurate than remembering
Source confusion
putting familiarity to the wrong source
i recognize this person
so they much have been the person to commit the crime
Evidence of learning/memory without explicit awareness
previous exposure makes later processing easier
see doctor
later are faster at processing nurse
even if you don’t remember seeing doctor earlier
word-stem completion
Word-stem completion
people see list of words
later receive CLA_ _ _
asked to fill in the rest of the word
more likely to say the word that seen earlier on the list even if they don’t consciously remember seeing it
Implicit memory influencing behavior
previous experiences can influence your behavior and judgments without you consciously remembering the experience
Familiarity affects behavior - Jacoby et el
Familiarity affects what you believe - Begg et al
Familiarity affects behavior - Jacoby et al
see a list of names
see on of the names again later
feels familiar
don’t remember why it is familiar
make a decision based on familiarity
Familiarity affects what you believe - Begg et al
people read statements
later in the day they saw those statements again
because they seen them before and they felt more familiar, people are more likely to believe them as true
Misattributions of implicit memory
people watched a fake crime
later show lineup of people who were supposedly involved in the crime
none of them were
felt like they seen one of the people before so they choose them when the person who actually did the crime isn’t even an option
source confusion
Processing fluency
repeated activation makes a pathway stronger
makes future processing faster, easier, and more fluent
can produce feelings of familiarity
Familiarity without experience
illusion of familiarity
a novel stimulus feels familiar because it is processed more fluent than expected
Hierarchy of memory types
different memory abilities can be separate from one another
memory
explicit memory
episodic memory
semantic memory
implicit memory
procedural memory
priming
perceptual learning
classical conditioning
Episodic memory
memory for specific experiences
personal events
episodes
Semantic memory
general knowledge
not tied to any specific time or place
Procedural memory
knowing how to do something
skills
Priming
changes in perception caused by previous experience
Perceptual learning
changes in perceptual systems as a result of experiences
Classical conditioning
learning associations between stimuli
Amnesia
impairment with memory
retrograde
anterograde
Retrograde amnesia
memories learned before the incident that caused them amnesia are disrupted
lose some memories from before the amnesia
can form new memories
Anterograde amnesia
new memories are disrupted
difficulty to form new memories after the amnesia
old memories are still intact
Double dissociation
one type of memory is impaired while another remains intact
and another patient can show the opposite pattern
shows that the two abilities are functionally separate
need to have both sides to say this
hippocampal damage
amygdala damage
Hippocampal damage
impaired explicit memory
intact implicit memory
Amygdala damage
impaired implicit
intact explicit