Health Sciences 2800: Research Methods and Health Epidemiology

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/97

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary practice flashcards covering health research concepts, sampling methodologies, study design, ethics, epidemiology metrics, threats to validity, and confounding from the HS 2800 lecture notes.

98 Terms

1
New cards

Determinants of Health

The biological, behavioural, social, environmental, political, and other factors that influence the health status of individuals and populations.

2
New cards

Health Research

An investigation of health and disease or any of the factors that contribute to the presence or absence of physical, mental, and social health.

3
New cards

Clinical Research

Research that evaluates the best ways to prevent, diagnose, and treat adverse health issues that adversely affect individuals and families.

4
New cards

Population Health Research

Research that focuses on health outcomes and determinants of health in groups of humans (populations).

5
New cards

Biological Research

Research that looks at changes at the human cellular level that can be related to health outcomes.

6
New cards

Demography

The study of the size and composition of population dynamics, such as birth and death rates.

7
New cards

Research

The process of systematically and carefully investigating a subject in order to discover new insights about the world.

8
New cards

Five Steps of Research

  1. Identify; 2. Select study approach; 3. Design and collect data; 4. Analyze; 5. Report.
9
New cards

Pre-clinical Research

A type of health research that investigates the safety, mechanism, and potential effectiveness of a drug, therapy, medical device, or other health intervention.

10
New cards

Health Services Research

A type of health research evaluating how social factors, financing systems, organizational structures and processes, health technologies, and personal behaviours affect health care, quality, and cost.

11
New cards

Brainstorming

The process of generating long lists of spontaneous ideas about possible research questions.

12
New cards

Concept Mapping

The visual listing of ideas and grouping them to reveal relationships.

13
New cards

SKIM Reading

A reading strategy consisting of reading the title, abstract, introduction, headings, first and last sentence of every paragraph, and conclusion, followed by telling a peer what the article was about.

14
New cards

Abstract

A one-paragraph summary of an article, chapter, or book.

15
New cards

SMART Objectives

Objectives defined as Specific, Measurable, Attainable (or Achievable), Relevant (or Realistic), and Timely (or Time-bound).

16
New cards

Research Aim

The overarching goal stating what you want to do (the destination).

17
New cards

Research Objectives

The specific steps detailing how you will accomplish the research aim (the directions).

18
New cards

Good Research Question Criteria

The five essential characteristics: 1. A real question; 2. Testable; 3. Generalizable; 4. Purposeful; 5. Worth answering.

19
New cards

Generalizability

The requirement that research findings must be applicable beyond the study population in order to advance science.

20
New cards

Purposeful (Research Question)

A research question characteristic meaning it is designed to answer one well-defined and specific question.

21
New cards

Inquiry

The process of finding answers to questions that arise from personal experiences.

22
New cards

Testability

The ability of a research question to be answered using experiments or other types of measurements.

23
New cards

Originality

The novel aspects of a new research project that allow it to make a unique contribution to the health science literature.

24
New cards

Replicability

The principle that a study protocol implemented in a new study population should generate results similar to those of the original study, provided the same protocol is used.

25
New cards

EDP Approach

A research question format structuring inquiries as: 'Is [exposure] related to [disease/outcome] in [population]?'

26
New cards

Risk Factor

An exposure that increases an individual's likelihood of subsequently experiencing a particular disease or outcome.

27
New cards

Protective Factor

An exposure that reduces an individual's likelihood of subsequently experiencing a particular disease or outcome.

28
New cards

Non-modifiable Risk Factor

A risk factor for a disease that cannot be changed.

29
New cards

Modifiable Risk Factor

A risk factor for a disease that can be avoided or mitigated.

30
New cards

Outcome

An observed event, such as the presence of disease in a participant in an observational study or the measured endpoint in an experimental study.

31
New cards

Population

A group of individuals, communities, or organizations with identifiable similar characteristics.

32
New cards

Primary Prevention

Health behaviours and protective actions that help keep an adverse health event from occurring in individuals who do not already have the condition.

33
New cards

Secondary Prevention

The detection of health problems in asymptomatic individuals at an early stage when conditions have not caused significant damage and can be treated more easily.

34
New cards

Tertiary Prevention

Interventions that reduce impairment, minimize pain and suffering, and prevent death in people with symptomatic health problems.

35
New cards

PICOT

A research framework components: Patient (or Population) and Problem, Intervention tested, Comparison/Control group, Outcome of interest, and Timeframe for follow-up.

36
New cards

Three Levels of Reading

  1. Screen (is this article potentially relevant?); 2. Skim (what is this article about, and what did the researchers do and find?); 3. Study (what can I learn from it, and how will I use it?).
37
New cards

Literature Review Structural Formats

Chronological, Major themes, The wheel, and The inverted pyramid.

38
New cards

Confidentiality & Privacy

Anonymizing or de-identifying data, storing data securely, and only sharing information with proper consent.

39
New cards

Respect for Persons and Autonomy

Obtaining informed consent, respecting participants' choices, privacy, and dignity, and providing extra protections for vulnerable populations.

40
New cards

Beneficence

Designing studies that have social or scientific value and ensuring that the research is worth doing.

41
New cards

Justice (Research Ethics)

Fairly selecting participants (avoiding exploitation or exclusion) and distributing the benefits and burdens of research so that no group is unfairly burdened or excluded from benefits.

42
New cards

Integrity and Transparency

Being honest about methods, findings, and conflicts of interest, avoiding fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism, and reporting results truthfully.

43
New cards

Informed Consent

Ensuring participants are fully informed about the study's purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, and right to withdraw without penalty, presented in a voluntary, comprehensible, and documented manner.

44
New cards

Non-maleficence

The ethical duty to do no harm by minimizing physical, psychological, social, and legal risks, ensuring any potential harm is justified by potential benefits.

45
New cards

Ontology

The philosophical study of what constitutes reality and what can be known about it ('What am I looking at?').

46
New cards

Epistemology

The philosophical study of how knowledge is created, developed, and communicated ('The knowledge about reality').

47
New cards

Positivism

A research paradigm that seeks universal, measurable laws based on a single objective reality.

48
New cards

Constructivism

A research paradigm that seeks to understand subjective meanings, contexts, and diverse human experiences.

49
New cards

Positionality Statement

A description of an author's identity in society, especially as it relates to a particular research project.

50
New cards

Macro/Grand Theories and Micro Theories

Mental models designed to understand phenomena and organize complexity (e.g., Karl Marx's theory of Marxism, Game theory).

51
New cards

Theoretical Framework (Models)

A specific or concrete instance of a theory used to map a theory to a research question or phenomenon ('to act').

52
New cards

Conceptual Framework

Applying a particular theory to a particular problem, justified with a literature review and methodology for a specific research study.

53
New cards

Eco-social Model

A model designed to understand human development in the broader ecological and social context ('the Big picture').

54
New cards

Evans & Stoddart Model

A health model asserting that human health is not just about healthcare, but also includes genetics, the physical environment, social environment, and other factors.

55
New cards

Health Belief Model

A psychological model positing that health-related action depends on perceived risk, severity, benefits, barriers, motivation, and confidence.

56
New cards

Target Population

The entire group of people that a researcher wants their study results to apply to.

57
New cards

Source Population (Sampling Frame)

The specific pool of people from whom the sample is selected.

58
New cards

Sample

The group of people approached to take part in the survey or research.

59
New cards

Study Population

The individuals who actually took part in the research study.

60
New cards

Probability Sampling

Selection techniques where the probability of selecting each sampling unit is known, represented as: Prob(Sampled)=nN\text{Prob}(\text{Sampled}) = \frac{n}{N}.

61
New cards

Stratified Sampling

A probability sampling technique drawing random samples from distinct subgroups or strata, such as geography (urban, rural, suburban) or sex (female, male, nonbinary).

62
New cards

Cluster Sampling

A probability sampling method where naturally existing clusters (e.g., schools, neighbourhoods) are selected rather than individuals, and observations are made on all units within the chosen clusters.

63
New cards

Multistage Sampling

A sampling method involving hierarchical selection stages: primary sampling units (e.g., municipalities), secondary units (e.g., city blocks), and tertiary units (e.g., individuals).

64
New cards

Convenience Sample

A nonprobability-based sampling method selecting individuals, schools, workplaces, organizations, or communities based on ease of access.

65
New cards

Proper Sample Size Calculation Factors

Calculated based on: 1. Effect estimate of exposure on outcome (larger effect requires smaller sample); 2. Accepted error (smaller desired error requires larger sample); 3. Variation of outcome in population (complex, largest when prevalence is 50%50\%).

<p>Calculated based on: 1. Effect estimate of exposure on outcome (larger effect requires smaller sample); 2. Accepted error (smaller desired error requires larger sample); 3. Variation of outcome in population (complex, largest when prevalence is $$50\%$$).</p>
66
New cards

Type I Error (α\alpha)

Concluding that there is a treatment effect or an exposure/outcome association when there is not (statistical false positive; 'jumping the gun').

67
New cards

Type II Error (β\beta)

Failing to detect a real treatment effect or an exposure/outcome association when one actually exists in the source population (statistical false negative; 'missing the boat').

68
New cards

Interview

The process of verbally asking a participant questions and recording their responses.

69
New cards

Self-administered Survey

A questionnaire form that participants complete independently, using either a paper-and-pencil version or an online format.

70
New cards

Closed-ended Questions

Survey questions that allow a limited, fixed number of possible responses.

71
New cards

Open-ended Questions

Survey questions that allow an unlimited number of possible, free-form responses.

72
New cards

Exposure Measurement

Assessing the quantity of a substance or hazard an individual encounters and how much enters the body or affects tissues (measured via available dose, administered dose, absorbed dose, or active dose).

73
New cards

Ratio

A mathematical relationship comparing two numbers where the numerator is not necessarily included in the denominator.

74
New cards

Proportion

A mathematical fraction comparing two numbers where the numerator is necessarily included in the denominator, always ranging between 00 and 11.

75
New cards

Odds

The probability of an event occurring relative to the probability of it not occurring.

76
New cards

Rate

A measure of the speed of occurrence of an event over time, calculated with the number of observed events as the numerator and the population at risk over a set time period as the denominator.

77
New cards

Prevalence Rate

The proportion of the population (or population sample) that has a given disease or other attribute at a specified point in time or period of time.

78
New cards

Incidence Rate

The proportion of the population at risk that develops a given disease or new attribute during a specified period of time.

79
New cards

Four Hallmarks of Health Studies

  1. A research question or plausible theory; 2. A well thought-out design to address the question; 3. Measurement of exposure and outcome; 4. Analysis to compare groups.
80
New cards

Relative Risk

A metric describing how many times as likely an exposed individual is to experience a health outcome compared to an unexposed individual, indicating the strength of an association.

81
New cards

Random Error

Variability in measurement or sampling caused purely by chance.

82
New cards

Systematic Error

A consistent error in study design, collection, or measurement resulting from a recognizable, non-random source.

83
New cards

Three-Pass Approach (Keshav, 2016)

A paper-reading method: First pass (5–10 min bird's-eye view using the 5 C's: Category, Content, Correctness, Contributions, Clarity); Second pass (<1 hr summarizing aims/objectives); Third pass (reproducing/critically evaluating the paper).

84
New cards

Validity

The accuracy of a measurement or study result (characterized by having fewer systematic and random errors).

85
New cards

Reliability

The consistency and repeatability of a measurement over repeated applications.

86
New cards

Internal Validity

The condition where the effect estimated from the analytic sample is equal to the true causal effect in the study sample.

87
New cards

External Validity

The condition where the true causal effect in the study sample is equal to the true causal effect in the target population.

88
New cards

Threats to Validity (The Big 3)

  1. Chance (random sampling error); 2. Bias (selection bias, information bias); 3. Confounding.
89
New cards

Selection Bias

A systematic error in the way participants are selected or retained in a study.

90
New cards

Volunteer Bias

A type of selection bias occurring when volunteers differ systematically from non-volunteers (e.g., being more health-conscious or from a different socio-economic group).

91
New cards

Differential Exposure

A bias that occurs when the probability of being categorized into the wrong exposure group depends on the participant's disease or outcome status.

92
New cards

Healthy Worker Effect

A type of membership bias where working populations experience lower mortality or morbidity rates compared to the general population.

93
New cards

Loss to Follow-up Bias

A selection bias common in clinical trials or longitudinal studies where participants leave the study early in a differential manner (e.g., the sickest individuals withdrawing).

94
New cards

Confounding

A distortion of the actual exposure-outcome association caused by a mixing of effects with an incidental variable known as a confounder, occurring because the exposed and unexposed groups are not exchangeable.

95
New cards

Criteria for a Confounding Variable

  1. Causally associated with the outcome (a true risk factor); 2. Non-causally or causally associated with the exposure; 3. Not an intermediate (mediator) on the causal pathway between exposure and outcome.
96
New cards

Assessing Confounding Steps

Step 1: Conceptualize the relationship; Step 2: Think of variables; Step 3: Exclude variables on the causal pathway; Step 4: Identify true confounders; Step 5: Deal with confounders through design and adjustment.

97
New cards

Effect Modification

A phenomenon that occurs when the strength or direction of an exposure-outcome association changes across different levels of a third variable.

98
New cards

Mediation

The role of an intermediary variable that lies directly on the causal chain between an exposure and an outcome, which is distinct from a confounder by definition.