1/73
carp ch 1-6, VG ch 1-9
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is the primary source of law in the United States
The US Constitution, the supreme law of the land. Other sources include statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions.
What is the courtroom work group?
The judge, prosecutor, and dense attorney who work together to process cases
What is jurisdiction?
A court’s legal authority to hear and define a case
What is concurrent jurisdiction?
When two or more courts or court systems have authority to hear the same type of case
What is original jurisdiction?
Authority to hear a case for the first time
What is appellate jurisdiction?
Authority to review a lower court’s decision for legal errors
What cases fall under the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction under Article III?
Cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consults, and cases in which a state is a party
What is judicial review?
The power of courts to determine whether government actions or laws violate the constitution
What is a majority opinion?
An opinion expressing the reasoning and decision supported by a majority of participating judges or justices
What is a concurring opinion?
An opinion agreeing with the outcome but offering different or additional reasoning
What is a dissenting opinion?
An opinion explaining disagreement with the court’s decision
What is a plurality opinion?
An opinion whose rationale receives the most votes but no the majority
What is a per curiam opinion?
An opinion issued in the name of the court rather than signed by an individual judge or justice
What is a unanimous opinion?
An opinion in which all participating judges or justices agree
What is a holding?
The legal determination necessary to decide a case
What is dicta?
Statements in an opinion that are no necessary to decide the case
What nine types of legal materials can judges use?
constitutional text
framer’s intent and ratification
constitutional structure
fundamental purposes and values
tradition and history
social science
contemporary morality
practicality
prudence
What are the three tiers of the federal court systems?
District courts, courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court
What do federal district courts do?
Hear cases at trial, determine facts, and issue initial decisions
What do federal courts of appeals do?
Review lower court decisions for legal errors
What does the Supreme Court do?
Reviews selected cases and resolves major federal legal and constitutional questions
What is fragmentation in the court system?
Division among multiple courts or jurisdictions, sometimes making the system complex or inefficient
What is a specialty court?
A court or court program created to address a specific problem or category of cases
What is justiciability
Whether a dispute is appropriate for judicial resolution and should be heard by a court
What are the five justiciability doctrines?
Standing
Mootness
Ripeness
Political-question doctrine
Prohibition against advisory opinions
What is standing?
The requirement that a person bringing the case have a sufficient personal stake in the dispute
What is mootness?
The dispute has ended or no longer presents a live controversy the court can meaningfully resolve
What is ripeness?
The dispute is sufficiently developed for judicial review rather than premature
What is the political-question doctrine?
Courts may decline to decide issues committed to another branch or lacking manageable judicial standards
What is the prohibition against advisory opinions?
Federal courts generally cannot answer hypothetical legal questions without an actual case or controversy
What is originalism?
An approach that gives substantial weight to the Constitution’s origia lmeaning when adopted
What is textualism?
An approach emphasizing the meaning of the legal text’s words in context
What is judicial activism?
A contested label for judicial behavior perceives as aggressive, such as invalidating government action or departing from precedent
What are the three main constitutional tests?
Rational basis
Intermediate scrutiny
Strict scrutiny
What is the rational basis?
The law must be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose
Who bears the burden under rational basis review
Generally, the person challenging the law
Is a law presumed constitutional under rational basis
Generally, yes until proven otherwise
What is intermediate scrutiny?
The government must show that the classification is substantially related to an important government interest
What classification commonly triggers intermediate scrutiny?
sex-based classifications
What is strict scrutiny?
The government must show that the law is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest
Who bears the burden under strict scrutiny?
The government
What types of cases commonly trigger strict scrutiny?
Cases involving fundamental rights or certain suspect classifications, such as race-based classifications under the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment
Which test is most deferential?
Rational basis
Which test is most demanding?
Strict scrutiny
What ar ethe key phrases for the three tests?
Rational Basis: legitimate interest and rational relationship
Intermediate: important interest and substantial relationship
Strict: compelling interest and narrow tailoring
How are federal judges selected?
The president nominates them, and the Senate provides advice and consent through confirmation
What is an advantage of federal judicial appointment?
It can protect judicial independence by avoiding election campaigns and providing life tenure for Article III judges
What is a disadvantage of federal judicial appointment?
The process can be highly partisan and influenced by ideology
What is an advantage of judicial elections?
Direct accountability to voters
What is a disadvantage of judicial elections?
Campaign fundraising and public pressure may threaten perceived impartiality
What is gubernatorial appointment?
is the power or process by which a state governor selects an individual to fill a public office, such as a state agency head, board or commission member, interim legislator, or state judge
What is an advantage of gubernatorial appointment?
It can emphasize experience and qualifications without requiring candidates to campaign for votes
What is a disadvantage of gubernatorial appointment?
Political favoritism may influence appointments
What is merit selection or the Missouri Plan?
A nominating commission evaluates candidates and recommends qualified nominees for appointment, later retention or review depends on the state system
What is an advantage of merit selection?
It emphasizes qualifications and may reduce competitive election pressure
What is a disadvantage of merit selection?
The commission may still be politically influenced, and the process may be less directly accountable to voters
What is a legal syllogism?
Legal reasoning that applies a general rule to specific facts to reach a conclusion
What are the three parts of a legal syllogism?
Major premise: legal rule
Minor premise: case facts
Conclusion: result from applying the rule to the facts
What are federal constitutional (formal) qualifications for Article III federal judges?
The Constitution specifies no minimum age, citizenship duration, law degree, or years of legal experience
What qualifications are commonly considered in judicial selection?
Legal experience, professional reputation, education, judicial experience, and other professional or political factors
What is a grand jury?
A group of citizens that reviews evidence to determine whether probable cause supports formal criminal charges
Does a grand jury determine guilt?
No, it decides whether charges should proceed, not whether the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
What is an indictment?
A formal accusation issued by a grand jury stating that criminal charges should proceed
Does an indictment mean guilt?
no, it is an accusation, not a conviction
What does IRAC stand for?
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
What does CRAC stand for?
Conclusion, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
What should a constitutional issue statement identify?
The specific government action, constitutional right, and legal question raised by the facts
What rule should I state for the gun-case essay?
Strict scrutiny: the government must show a compelling interest and narrow tailoring
What is the main job of the analysis section?
Apply the strict-scrutiny requirements to the specific facts of the case
What questions should I ask about the government’s interest?
What interest is asserted, and is it compelling?
What questions should I ask about narrow tailoring?
Does the law closely fit the interest? Is it overbroad? Could a less restrictive alternative work?
What should the conclusion say?
Whether the law is constitutional under strict scrutiny, based on the analysis
What should be the longest part of the essay?
The analysis applying the rule to the facts