Midterm W 8

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/47

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

48 Terms

1
New cards

Personal Jurisdiction (PJ)

Concerns the court's authority over the defendant or the defendant's property.

2
New cards

14th Amendment Due Process Clause

Limits state court power over non-resident defendants.

3
New cards

Full Faith and Credit Clause

States must enforce valid judgments from sister states if the rendering court had proper jurisdiction.

4
New cards

Pennoyer Era

Established a strict territorial model for jurisdiction.

5
New cards

In Personam

Direct jurisdiction over a person based on physical presence, residence, or consent.

6
New cards

In Rem

Jurisdiction over property to resolve ownership claims.

7
New cards

Quasi In Rem Type I

Dispute directly involves attached property.

8
New cards

Quasi In Rem Type II

Involves attachment of local property for unrelated personal claims.

9
New cards

International Shoe Co. v. Washington (1945)

Established minimum contacts requirement for personal jurisdiction.

10
New cards

Minimum Contacts

The degree of connection between the defendant and the forum state.

11
New cards

Specific Jurisdiction

Exists when a claim arises out of the defendant's contacts with the forum.

12
New cards

General Jurisdiction

Allows a court to hear any claims against a defendant if they are 'at home' in the forum.

13
New cards

Purposeful Availment

Defendant must intentionally direct activities toward a forum state.

14
New cards

Hanson v. Denckla

Unilateral activity of plaintiff cannot create jurisdiction.

15
New cards

World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

Foreseeability alone does not establish jurisdiction.

16
New cards

Stream of Commerce Plus Standard

Requires 'something more' than mere product placement for jurisdiction.

17
New cards

Brennan Stream Standard

Placing a product into commerce with knowledge it will reach the forum creates contacts.

18
New cards

Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz

Contractual contacts must be evaluated as a whole, not in isolation.

19
New cards

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court (2017)

Requires a direct connection between the forum and the specific plaintiff's claim.

20
New cards

Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court (2021)

Jurisdiction exists if the defendant purposefully cultivated the state market.

21
New cards

Fair Play & Substantial Justice

Five factors assessed to determine the reasonableness of exercising jurisdiction.

22
New cards

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown

General jurisdiction requires continuous and systematic affiliations with the forum.

23
New cards

Daimler AG v. Bauman

A corporation is 'at home' in the jurisdiction where it is incorporated or has its principal place of business.

24
New cards

Burnham v. Superior Court

Personal service on an individual present in the forum satisfies due process.

25
New cards

Shaffer v. Heitner (1977)

Overruled Pennoyer's quasi in rem rules; jurisdiction must meet minimum contacts analysis.

26
New cards

Consent & Waiver Mechanisms

Defendants can consent to jurisdiction explicitly or through conduct.

27
New cards

Forum Selection Clauses

Contracts specifying a particular forum as the venue for legal disputes.

28
New cards

Long-Arm Statute

State statutes that define the extent of personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.

29
New cards

FRCP 4(k)(1)(A)

Federal courts may exercise personal jurisdiction based on state court general jurisdiction.

30
New cards

FRCP 4(k)(1)(B) '100-Mile Bulge Rule'

Allows specific jurisdiction for joined parties served within 100 miles of the federal courthouse.

31
New cards

Notice Requirement

Constitutional requirement that must adequately inform parties of legal actions.

32
New cards

Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

Notice must be reasonably calculated to inform interested parties.

33
New cards

Service Requirements (FRCP 4)

Must serve the summons and complaint together within 90 days of filing.

34
New cards

FRCP 12(b)(2)

Motion for lack of personal jurisdiction must be raised in the first response.

35
New cards

FRCP 12(b)(4)

Insufficient process challenges defects in the content of the summons.

36
New cards

FRCP 12(b)(5)

Insufficient service of process challenges the manner of delivery.

37
New cards

28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)

Determines general venue for federal district courts based on residency and events.

38
New cards

Non-Conveniens Doctrine

Allows courts to dismiss cases for better-suited alternative forums.

39
New cards

Transfer When Original Venue IS Proper

Transfer case for convenience and in the interest of justice.

40
New cards

Transfer When Original Venue IS Improper

Transfer case or dismiss it to a proper venue.

41
New cards

Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno (1981)

Dismissal under FNC allowed even if the foreign court's law is less favorable.

42
New cards

Civil Procedure Exam Workflow

A systematic analysis of personal jurisdiction, notice, and venue.

43
New cards

Statutory Check

Evaluating if the state's long-arm statute applies to the defendant.

44
New cards

Purposeful Availment Test

Establishes a connection through intentional conduct directed at the forum.

45
New cards

5 Reasonableness Factors

Evaluates if jurisdiction is fair considering specific circumstances.

46
New cards

Domiciled Individuals

Resides in the judicial district of their domicile for venue purposes.

47
New cards

Corporate Residency

Corporations reside in districts where they are subject to personal jurisdiction.

48
New cards

Multi-District States Analysis

Assessing each district's eligibility regarding venue and jurisdiction.