1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Musonda does his research in Zambia, focusing on
labour conditions in the mining industry
The article is strongly based in anthropological theory but also has a highly personal perspective, drawing on Musonda’s own experiences
Thus it includes an aspect of autoethnography (analysis of one’s own responses and behaviour), an interesting but fairly uncommon approach in anthropology
Anthropology of epidemics & pandemics: Studies are very broad and have included:
Work with AIDS patients and their support networks – looking at resilience, activism
Studies of mortuary practices during outbreaks of Ebola and other diseases
Public health, addressing needs of bereaved
Many studies focusing on the past
bioarchaeology of epidemics
Epidemics and pandemics in history: More recent epidemics and pandemics can offer us unexpected and interesting parallels to recent events
1885 Montreal smallpox outbreak
In Canada, public responses to the 1918-19 influenza pandemic complicated by some familiar issues
1885 Montreal smallpox outbreak
Vaccination known since 1790s, very dependable by 1880s
An anti-vaccination movement still developed
Adherents included alternative medicine practitioners, libertarians
Political polarization reduced vaccine uptake by the French-speaking community, resulting in higher mortality
In Canada, public responses to the 1918-19 influenza pandemic were complicated by some familiar issues:
Objections against masking that seem driven in part by the mask as a visible symbol of pandemic measures
Objections to closure of public spaces (e.g. movie theatres) due to feared economic impact and due to the role of these places as symbols of normal life
Epidemics and pandemics in bioarchaeology: Bioarchaeology also offers some information
Illnesses like plague, smallpox and flu not visible on bone
Do not affect bone, or kill too quickly for visible bone reaction to form
Their presence is inferred from context or detected through DNA
Context: mass burial may indicate epidemic though other evidence must be checked
• DNA – allows detection of some diseases, has provided valuable information on evolution of plague
Mortuary impacts in modern communities: Studies of modern disease outbreaks show importance of mortuary practices
E.g. Ebola, 2014-5, Sierra Leone
Prohibition of private funerals for victims (the government performed burials instead) reflected urgent need to stop transmission
However, government planners’ failure to consider how traditional funerals reflect key social values led to public resentment and perception of ‘safe burials’ as foreign
Mortuary impacts in modern communities: Social science research may seem like the last thing needed in an emergency but this study provided important insights:
Reluctance to follow ‘safe burial’ guidelines not due to failure to understand the threat of Ebola – ‘better education’ wouldn’t help
It’s important to consider the overall form and social function of a culture’s mortuary practices even in emergencies
Respecting these as much as possible could improve adherence, also survivors’ mental health
Mortuary impacts of COVID-19: Studies of mourning and mortuary practices in COVID-19 may be understood in same context
Help governments, health systems, other organizations to understand impacts on mental health and social ties
Help design better responses to future crises
Mortuary impacts of COVID-19: Researchers discuss some fundamental changes
Death ‘alone’ (without family/friends physically there) in hospitals, sometimes sedated
Death (especially at peak periods) as ‘one of many’
Departures from normative treatment of body
Delayed treatment, storage in unconventional places/ways
Funerals that departed from normative format and were attended by fewer/virtual mourners
Altered commemoration practices
Due to distancing, travel bans, other pandemic stresses
Musonda’s article is an anthropological study, but also a highly personal commentary on the COVID-19 epidemic in Zambia: Focuses on deaths in hospital and subsequent funerals
This explains his choice of model – Street’s ‘sociotechnical assemblage’
Street studied hospitals in the Global South
Street saw these hospitals as social and technological ‘packages’ – they offer treatment, but this comes with all of the authority of biomedicine over health, the body and knowledge (this draws on ideas from Foucault covered in Lecture 4)
Also often underfunded, places where “people must strive to make biomedicine work in conditions of institutional instability and medical uncertainty” (Street 2014)
Musonda describes a scarcity of everything in Zambian hospitals (including doctors, funding and equipment) that creates challenges for patients and their families:
Patients rely heavily on their families, who bring daily supplies, provide basic care, and even negotiate for access to tests and equipment
This is consistent with the general importance of kin networks to Zambian society, but had serious implications during COVID
Medical system that was already stressed was stretched to near-failure
Normative ‘good deaths’ and funerals in Zambia include a lot of traits familiar to us from discussions of other cultures:
If someone dies in hospital their death is confirmed, the family is given time with the body, and it is prepared and taken to a mortuary where the family is allowed to visit and touch it again to say goodbye
The family is joined at their home by their social support network – family, neighbours and friends – who mourn with them
If possible the funeral is delayed until all can attend
Close family members prepare and dress the corpse
The funeral is as lavish and well-attended as possible, showing respect for the deceased and for the mourners who attend
COVID restrictions reversed these in multiple ways:
Deaths occurred with little acknowledgement from overworked personnel, usually with no family present to say goodbye
Large home gatherings were prohibited
Only minimal delay allowed between death and funeral
Family members not allowed to prepare or dress the corpse
Corpse wrapped in plastic, not dressed in carefully selected clothing
Strict limits on funeral attendance
People also responded with various strategies to get around or compensate for restrictions
Challenging, arguing with or ignoring medical staff
Work-arounds like virtual visiting, virtual help for the ill (transferred funds) or alternative mortuary practices seen as more culturally acceptable (e.g. glass-topped coffins to allow viewing)
Defiance of restrictions on gathering size
In general, COVID-19 funerals in many nations violated important expected norms
Treatment of body sometimes not normative
Norms vary by culture/faith – prompt release to family or embalming and display both sometimes impossible
Few people attending in person
Violates expectations that many will be there to say goodbye, also survivors’ obligations to honor dead
In some cases no in-person funeral at all
Pandemic deaths exacerbate normal trauma of loss because they often violate some common expectations for good death
This is described by Musonda and also noted by researchers working in other communities, with common themes of:
A unexpected and relatively sudden death
No time to prepare; death seen as ‘unfair’, ‘unlucky’ or ‘too soon’
Death without family or friends present due to restrictions
Limited or no chance for the dying to express affection and say goodbye
Family’s obligation to comfort the dying denied
Pandemic mourners may feel their grief is minimized or ignored
Death as one of many – if so many people are grieving or hurting in other ways, is the weight of one death diminished?
Death may be associated with feelings of guilt or unreality
Not there to say goodbye; feelings of guilt over infection or ‘being spared’
Deceased may be ‘blamed’ for behaviour including unvaccinated status
In some places and at some times, infrastructure for dealing with corpses overwhelmed
Bodies waiting in morgues and funeral homes
Unacceptable time ‘on pause’, especially for faiths requiring prompt burial or cremation
Bodies stored in refrigerator trucks
Corpses are being cared for, but in a place that’s not culturally expected/acceptable
Bodies in wards and corridors – delay in separation of dead from space occupied by the living ill
Disruption also present for communities where dying were cared for at home
Bodies left waiting for care because morgues, funeral homes & cemeteries backed up
AoD may not help in any practical sense but does help us recognize our responses through concepts including:
Importance of a good death, some common features of a good death
Importance of identity in death
Versus anonymity of an isolated masked death
Importance of normative funerals for recognizing kin and friend ties to deceased but also ties and relationships between the living
Importance of the respectful handling of corpses and placing them in their own specific context
Importance of the corpse itself as memory image, focus for grief