1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
qualitative vs quantitative
qualitative data is a summary of verbal findings (words)
deals with experiences and perceptions
difficult to standardize and compare
some concerns about bias affecting findings
quantitative data is based on numbers and statistics
fewer issues with bias
reliable when done well
reliability + 2 types
inter-rater
test-retest
how consistent the result of a test will be; 2 types
inter-rater
imagine judges at the Olympics
6, 7, 6 == high inter-rater reliability, 0.9
10, 6, 3 == low inter-rater reliability, 0.2
test-retest
1 judge, scoring the same person multiple times
6 (2 weeks), 6 (2 weeks), 7 == high test-retest reliability, 0.8
5 (2 weeks), 2 (2 weeks), 9 == low test-retest reliability, 0.3
validity + 2 types:
concurrent validity
predictive validity
how well does a test measure what we want it to measure
concurrent validity
does this compare well with other measures of the same thing?; does this concur with other measures of the same thing?
e.g., scores compared with another motor skills assessment?
predictive validity
does this predict actual performance?
e.g., ADL assessment compared to actual assistance required
correlation
measure of how well something predicts something else
there are positive and negative correlations

standard deviation
2 SDs or more below the mean= services are warranted

p-value
tells us how reliable our data is; technically, it’s the probability that the data we have is just a product of change
a low p-value (less than 0.05) means a low probability our results happened by chance (less than 5%)
a high p-value (greater than 0.05) means a high probability our results happened by change (greater than 5%)

percentile rank
a way to rank something, for example, the motor skills of a 6-year-old child
e.g., a child in the 7th percentile means that
7% of children their age score worse
93% of children their age score better
just remember:
high percentile is a high rank
low percentile is a low rank