The First Amendment & SCOTUS cases

0.0(0)
Studied by 2 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/25

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Established judicial review

2
New cards

Judicial Review

Power of the court to determine if a government law or action is constitutional

3
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Established the Supremacy Clause & stated the power of Congress through the "Necessary & Proper Clause"

4
New cards

Supremacy Clause

The federal government & the Constitution are superior to stat government laws and actions. States must listen to federal

5
New cards

Necessary & Proper Clause

Cited in McCulloch v. Maryland as reason Congress was able to establish a national bank

6
New cards

5 Rights of the 1st Amendment

Religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition

7
New cards

The Establishment Clause

Government may not establish an official state religion (some argue cannot show preference to any religion)

8
New cards

The Free Exercise Clause

Citizens have the freedom of practice their religion and Congress cannot make a law that violates that freedom

9
New cards

Balace of Free Exercise & Establishment Clauses

EXAMPLE: prayer in public school that is implemented by the school is not allowed (Establishment), BUT voluntary student-led prayer is allowed (Free Exercise).

10
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

SCOTUS ruled that state-sponsored prayer in public school is unconstitutional. Because the public school receives state/federal $, the state is supporting a religion

11
New cards

Wisonsin v. Yoder (1972)

SCOTUS rules that Amish family does not have to send children to school past 8th grade as it conflicts with their free exercise. Students will not receive any extra knowledge and values within the system

12
New cards

Lemon Test

Three-part test created by the Supreme Court for examining the constitutionality of religious establishment issues.

13
New cards

Libel, Slander, Obscenity

Forms of speech NOT protected by the 1st Amendment

14
New cards

Libel & Slander

written/verbal false statements about another person that damage their reputation

15
New cards

Schenck v. US (1919)

SCOTUS rules that speech can be limited if during a wartime and speech can cause a "clear & present danger". Pamphlets encouraged ignoring draft was concern for military operations.

16
New cards

Clear & Present Danger

Government can interfere with speech that can potentially lead to a danger

17
New cards

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

SCOTUS overturns Schenck decision. Government must prove that speech actually can cause a danger to social order & chaos regardless of how hateful the speech is.

18
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

SCOTUS rules that students have freedom of speech within a school as long as speech does not prevent the functioning of the school day. Students wore black armbands to protest war

19
New cards

Texas v. Johnson (1989) & Eichmann v. US (1990)

SCOTUS rules that flag burning is a protected form of symbolic speech.

20
New cards

Prior Restraint

government censorship of information before it is published

21
New cards

NYT v. US (1971)

SCOTUS rules that government cannot interfere with the press and must prove that information would legitimately compromise national security. "Pentagon Papers Case"

22
New cards

NYT v. Sullivan (1964)

SCOTUS rules that plantiffs must prove that publication/newspapers acted with "actual malice" when printing information

23
New cards

Symbolic Speech

nonverbal "speech" such as picketing, flag burning, fashion choice

24
New cards

Pure Speech

Verbal expression of thoughts & opinions

25
New cards

"wall of separation"

the separation between church & statement

26
New cards

Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions

Government regulations that place restrictions on free speech. These regulations, specifying when, where, and in what way speech is allowed, are applied when unrestricted free speech will conflict with the rights of others.