1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
state courts
state court systems not handle about 100 million new cases annually, leading to delay and congestion
this magnitude is time-consuming, costly, and impacted every element of court processing
judges
APPROPRIATENESS OF CONDUCT
SETTLE QUESTIONS OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE
GUIDE THE QUESTIONING OF WITNESSES
INSTRUCT JURORS
DECIDE CASES
SENTENCING
ARE GENERALLY ELECTED IN THE U.S .; SOMETIMES APPOINTED
presiding over trial and plea deals (accept or thrown out)
rule over sentencing ex in a jury trial they still decided the length of sentence
the prosecutor (state’s attorney) (district attorney)
an appointed or elected member of the practicing bar who is responsible for bringing the state’s case against the accused
decide what criminal charge person had been arrested for
elected pros
country, city (political figure) - other pros hired underneath them
the prosecutor (duties)
INVESTIGATING POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW
COOPERATING WITH POLICE IN INVESTIGATING A CRIME
DETERMINING WHAT THE CHARGE WILL BE
INTERVIEWING WITNESSES IN CRIMINAL CASES
SUBPOENAING WITNESSES
ENTERING INTO PLEA BARGAINING NEGOTIATIONS
TRYING CRIMINAL CASES – REPRESENTS “ THE STATE ”
RECOMMENDING SENTENCES
prosecutorial discretion
the prosecutor’s authority to decide whether to bring a case to trial or to dismiss it outright
why pros wouldnt want to take something trial
flimsy evidence
case isnt a priority
charge: mis or felony
ex. COVID: pros stopped charging 5th degree drug possession
waste of time/court shouldnt be dealing with it
cops would arrest but pros didnt charge
mixed reaction from cops
In criminal court, it is not the “victim’s” case– the victim of the crime is a
witness, and may be compelled to testify, but cannot directly control whether criminal charges go forward
it is not your case
your dont want a case charged → pros still can go forward with it
forward = why: evidence is overwhelming (BaRD)
the defense attorney
legal counsel for the defendant in a criminal case
defense attorney: the right to counsel begins at
the earliest stages of the justice system
indigent defendant
A defendant who lacks the funds to hire a private attorney is entitled to free counsel
public defender
An attorney employed by the government to represent criminal defendants who cannot afford to pay for a lawyer
defense attorneys duties
INVESTIGATING THE INCIDENT
INTERVIEWING THE CLIENT, POLICE, AND WITNESSES
DISCUSSING THE MATTER WITH THE PROSECUTOR
REPRESENTING THE DEFENDANT
ENTERING INTO PLEA NEGOTIATION
PEPARING THE CASE FOR TRIAL
FILING AND ARGUING LEGAL MOTIONS WITH THE COURT
REPRESENTING THE DEFENDANT AT TRIAL
PROVIDING ASSISTANCE AT SENTENCING
DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE BASIS FOR APPEAL
resources pros v PD’s
pros: they deal with everyone
pd: dont deal with everyone
differences in salary + resources effects them)
funding disparities
“fewer resources than those who represent the govt. in cali, pros are annually allocated a billion dollars more than pd”
resources pros v PD’s example
travis pd:
fingerprints taken but not tested (pay for it)
no resources to test, had to trick DA/Pros to get it tested for it
the courtroom work group
the interdependence between judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys; also the practices and outcomes that result from this culture of teamwork
interdependent on each other
culture of cooperation/culture of framework
PD wants to slow things down → it effects everything (thinking what cases are worth the loss of cred when it comes to pissing up children)
courtroom work group: public pretender
client doesnt get as big as a output from pd and its going somewhere else/to other case
plea bargaining video
pros + pd trying to hash things out b4 trial
access to waive rights
plead guilty of lesser charge so they dont get higher charge
pb is recent in history → crim jus sys couldnt handle all cases
charged selling right + less charge to pros
accused is getting on with their life
line between cohesive and voluntary pleas is diff
plea deals
Innocent people may plead guilty
Guilty people may plead guilty to trumped up charges
WHY? Jail/Bail Lengthy sentences
long (awaiting trial)
trails risky, lot of work and resources
cohesion - pros discretion to charge -- change more severity → plea barg → def tells they can get it down to one if plea (pros can set terms between the plea bargaining agreement b4 the p deals are event sent)
afraid of what trial might bring up