1/63
Looks like no tags are added yet.
schooled society
refers to our current society where formal schooling is mandated and has moved to the centre stage of social life over the past century. School now plays a more important role in our identities, career opportunities, and has even more power to shape lives. It has become the major route for social mobility and is expected to teach children key values like equity, progress, merit etc.
social mobility
ability of individuals to move up or down in a society, school is the primary way of moving up.
School as socialization
schools help prepare kids for real world, pass along knowledge and values that are deemed important. examined by Durkheim
schools as selection devices
schools award badges of ability to those with the most talent, schools constantly evaluate and reward students, select the best ones to push forward into higher education. studied by Marx, ideas of who gets selected for what and why, does everyone have an equal chance
schools as means of organization and legitimation
schools organize and legitimate knowledge by setting knowledge requirements and certificates needed for certain jobs. legitmated through authority. decide how knowledge is transfered and taught. schools organized like a bureaucracy
Absolute social mobility
are you better off objectively than your parents at your age ex. if i’m making more now than my dad was at my age, i have experienced absolute social mobility
relative social mobility
how do you do relative to your parents, depends on your place in society. If you were making top 10% of income and your parents were in the bottom you’ve experienced relative mobility
Role of schooling in society
socialization, selection, organization and legitimation
Non cognitive/soft skills
perseverance, hard word, personality traits, grit, social trust
General skills
valuable across many jobs and industries - they are transferable
Specific skills
valuable only in a particular job, occupation, or firm
Polarization of labour
growth of high skill, high pay and low skill, low pay service
Ex. mcdonalds
social transformations leading to today
information society, service based economy, aging population, decline of nuclear family, immigration, more diversity, decline of religious authority, economic power in financial institutions
Macro theory
links schooling to broader forces (modernization, capitalism, culture ex. Industrialization leads to mass schooling - applies across societies)
Middle range
more tied to specific place and time ex. Canada's post secondary expansion in the immediate WW2
Micro theory
face to face ex. Teacher and student
Emilie Durkheim
focused on shift to modern values, how schools socialize kids, thought education was meant to teach values and help kids become moral individuals, education reflects society, meritocracy. hated individualism
Karl Marx
schools reporduce inequalities, education reflects ruling class ideology, schooling benefits rich kids, schools teach skills to match capitalist workplace, make kids into obedient workers
max weber
concerned with how modern societies are organized and governed, rationalisation and rise of reasoning is the key feature of modern society
structural functionalism
durkhiem, what is the function of education
universalism
meritocracy
hidden curriculum
streaming
collective effervervescence
health of society is the ultimate goal
Functionalist theory of stratification: selecting for merit
Stratification is a necessity
Ensures key social positions are filled
Maintains social stability
Schools play a major role in sorting and selection process
Functionally important positions, rank order of most to least essential
Not all social roles play equal role in societal stability/survival
Society responsible to provide strong incentives (ex. Money, prestige) for people to take most functionally important jobs
Talent, training, and scarcity, some require natural talent or long and costly training
People have to be motivated to take these jobs
Education is a key role by selecting people, schools identify talent and allocate people into appropriate social positions
Some people earn more because of differentiated natural talent, training etc doctor vs janitor
Neo-Marxism
Correspondence principle: school reflect capitalist workplaces
Schools sort people into positons that reproduce existing hierarchies
People are selected on the basis of their social class not so much talent or hard work
cultural capital signals wealth and mistaken for intelligence
social capital
strong and weak ties
employees dont claim the profit they make
ruling ideas of each age are of working class
cultural capital
familiarity with high status culture like opera and arts, big vocab, knowing how to dress etc. These prestigious tastes are rewarded in school because they are conflated with intelligence
social capital
who you know, Resources or advantages gained through social relationships
Higher SES students have stronger ties to schools and institutions
Weak ties: acquaintances, classmates, weak ties more common for networking
Weak ties expands your network more because people you have ties to don't all know each other
Strong ties: parents, siblings, close friends
Human capital theory
Education viewed as an investment in skills
Hoping for a return on your education
Companies want productivity because you get greater output for input
education, training, health, and skills are economic investments that increase an individual's productivity and future earnings
opportunity costs
people accept the opportunity costs because of the later pay off in the labour market. Ex. we’re in class because we think its a better use of time tht is likely to pay off later
Skills biased technological change
Inequality skills fail to match new technologies
Technological advancement raises demand for skilled labor
If education supply lags this leads to rise in wage inequality
Credentialism
School functions as a credentialing institution, not building skills
Credentials as entry tickets
school focuses on giving credientials instead of teaching skills
Credential Inflation
Post WW2: urbanization, women entering labour force
Schools produce more graduates than available matched jobs, vertical mismatched
Vertical mismatched is like doctor working at mcdonalds
Education level attained higher than education level required for the job
degrees worth less than in the past
Weak education-job link
School content has weak link to jobs
Employers rarely look for or test skills when hiring
Credentials matter more than grades or performance
Supply side effect, increased competition, individuals pursue credentials to have a leg up
Employers respond to supply be raising educational requirements
Credentials as a screening device: reject applicants without the right credentials
New institutionalism
Schools as a national project - common values, citizenship
Argue the world and institutions becoming very similar
International organizations like the UN, WHO, UNESCO et expectations for how schools should be running
Dominant nations like the US provide template and others copy that
Isomorphism
last few decades schools across the world taking similar forms
Schools all categorized by age, gender, curricula (math and science taught the same everywhere)
Signalling theory
Employers have incomplete information about applicants
Skills and productivity aren't directly observable
Credentials act as signals of something, like ability, motivation, hard work, perseverance
Labour queue theory
Employers rank applicants in a labour queue
Credentials are used to sort and screen applicants
More education, higher in the queue
Employers select the most educated first
Education signals trainability, not necessarily productivity
Training workers is costly
Skills formation occur on the job training
Sheep skin effect
person A and person B take same classes but A lists the credential, match in every other aspect but the credential sets them apart
Beginings of a schooled society
Schooling prior to 16th century was a privilege of the few
Education wasn't centralized or compulsory
not age segregated
reasons for transition to formal schooling
Economics: schooling became essential to ensure a skilled and compliant labour force was available
Technical complexity: schooling was necessary to ensure young people had skills for success in a growing technological world
Child susceptibility in a diverse world: schooling provided a venue to ensure children adopted a common value system
Nation building: school was part of a larger process of building an independent country
Modern schooling in mid 19th century
Students grouped by age
Instructions in separate classroom
Set times
School becomes centralized and standardized
State regulated
Compulsory attendance at least 4 months of the year
Minimum attendance requirements
Mandated teacher certification
Enrollment and Attendance
Early Canadian public schools
One room with single teacher
Minimally trained teachers
Instructions rudimentary, with basic literacy, arithmetic, religion, citizenship
Few students completed high school by 1900
For most school was intermittent - not a continuous daily experience
20th century expansion, department expansion, schools more bureaucratic, Canadian school size grew dramatically
Attendance ir norm
By 1960 full attendance achieved
Shift from elite to masses
Post secondary became expected not exceptional
Now sooo many students get bachelors degrees
Many disengaged students in hs still continue in school
More students in post secondary than ever before
Expanding curricula
Higher education served narrow, elite purposes
Most jobs didn't require post secondary now they do
Universities main gateway to elite positions
Secondary level: multiple specialized tracks and course
Post secondary level: hundreds of programs at undergrad and grad level
Expanding alternatives
Lifelong learning, early years to adult education
Rationales vary: childcare, socialization, early cognitive development
Early investment prevents later social health/cost problems
French immersion
Alternative programing for students, more autonomous learning
Home schooling
Online school, more efficient and can host moore students
People claim higher education bubble is about to burst
Expanding functions
Non cognitive and social functions
Modern schools have a whole bunch of services
Social workers, psychologists, haircutting, stores
Childcare, drivers ed, nutrition, outdoor education
Schools have sex ed, anti racism, multicultural curricula
Schools try to address social problems
Schools have also diversified in form, online school, homeschool, french immersion, private school
Exporting its model
School form exported to other institutions
Contemporary criminal justice has more programs for learning and reform movements
Educate them about toxic acts instead of punishing
Drunk driving seminars, anger management schools
Family life being altered by parenting classes,
Leisure being altered by courses for hobbies like how to play sports, how to do etc
Corporations use school forms for training
Campus like layouts of headquarters ex. Google HQ
What is streaming
Sorts students into different educational pathways
Based on perceived ability
Academic vs vocational streams
They operate at different levels
Level A: academic vs vocational
Level B: subject vs field of study
Level C: program or placement decision
Each level narrows future options
Higher SES more likely to end up in academic stream
Social class and streaming options
Marxists would say schools reproduce social inequalities
Schools become selection mechanism
Sorts people into different pathways which lead to different life chances
Differences between schools are small, most have the same curriculum
Schools segregated by neighbourhood and that's reflective of SES
Differences between students matters most, school matters the least
Europe has more rigid schooling, germany, switzerland, japan
Selection occurs early on, in elementary stage
Mobility between tracks is limited
Streaming shapes opportunities to learn
Stratification within post secondary
Two axes: international prestige and field of study
Shape access to opportunities: high paid jobs, social networks, resources
Fields differ in prestige, business more valuable than film
Canadians less hierarchical than the US by institutional prestige
Mostly publicly funded public university
Most undergrad applicants are local
More field stratification in canada
Accommodation
Becoming more acceptable to retain struggling students
Shift in policy after WW2
Two reasons: economic utility and educational equity/human rights
Education is a human right
Decline in high school completion is viewed as a social problem
In 60s described high schools as shopping malls
Offering them different product for each student
How do schools accommodate
levels of difficulty: multiple course pathways
▪ choice breadth: many electives and extracurriculars
▪ Specialty program: gifted programs, ESL, AP, vocational shop
Making school an experience for everyone
Services, Multiple Intelligence and Consequences
▪ Non-instructional services: therapist, social workers, nutrition programs
▪ Theories like multiple intelligences
▪ Possible erosion of academic standards
Competition
Educational Expansion and Competition
School has expanded but doesn't necessarily lead to equality
▪ Paradox: expansion may not necessarily lead to lesser inequalities
▪ Two mechanisms or theories explain:
o Maximally Maintained Inequality (MMI)
o Effectively Maintained Inequality (EMI)
Maximally maintained inequality
Vertical stratification
As one level becomes saturated, the advantaged groups move up
Effectively maintained inequality
Horizontal stratification
advantaged groups become more selective within the same level
Institutions, fields, program
Despite the expansion, the advantaged groups seek high quality opportunities
Field and institution the most important within BA, the main way to differentiate yourself
Don't have to go up, they can go sideways
EMI and MMMI
Access to higher education remains stable despite expansion
Institutional factors weaker than field factors in canada
Recycling: acquire credential at a lower level
person likely chooses lucrative field at a less prestigious institution than choose less
lucrative field at a prestigious
Competition produces credential stacking, multiple alternatives or paths
Attainment and inequality
SES differences in literacy are visible from grade 1 onward
High school: teens with university educated parents outperform pears on reading, math, science
Youth from bottom income quartile far more likely to drop out of high school
University attendance: 50% top quartile vs 31% bottom quartile
SES gradient present at all levels of schooling
Persists after controlling for ethnicity, region, family structure
Strong across different measures of SES and education (income, parental education, test scores, attendance)
Causes of inequality
Schools, families, broader environments
Coleman report challenged the belief that unequal schools resources lead to unequal outcomes, differences in funding, teachers, class size, facilities
The report concluded that student outcomes were strongly influenced by SES not school resources
Larger inequalities within schools than between schools
Parental income influence on grades, when we control for gender, we compare female and female together and male and male together
Later findings say that in wealthy countries, family background matters more
In poor countries school effects are stronger
Richer societies have more mature systems of education
Affluent societies learn to play the game - preparation
In summer rich kids get opportunities to keep developing skills
Poor kids don't and experience learning loss
Mechanisms/processes
What mechanisms of educational inequality are at play here
primary mechanisms
directly affect children's capacity to learn (skills, readiness). What are the factors affecting ability and skill
Secondary
affect outcomes via choices, expectations, and sorting independent of raw learning capacity ex. Controlling for ability and skill and looking at choices
Ex. me and julia have same abilities but i go to college and she goes to university, why did we make those decisions
Primary mechanisms
Nature vs nurture
Heredity: identical twins more similar than fraternal twins, adopted kids IQ more similar to bio parents
Flynn effect: generational rise of IQ
Family based opportunities also influence ability
They get richer verbal interactions, more books, homework support, regulation of activities, organized learning time, access to cultural and educational resources
Early environment influences later grades
Early learning programs get highest return on investment
SES gaps appear before school in vocabulary and cognitive readiness
Neighbourhood influences you with safety, peer culture, disengagement from school
Secondary mechanisms
Why does inequality still persist even though some students have similar abilities
Rational choice/risk benefit framework
Education involves choices, not just ability
Alternative exists and families need to make a choice
Academic vs vocational track, stay in school vs exit; college vs university vs work
Students and families assess expected risks vs benefits
Relative risk aversion
Everyone wants to avoid downward mobility
Higher SES families choose advanced courses and accept higher risks for higher reward
Lower SES families prefer safer, less demanding routes; avoid paths with high failure risk
Time discounting
higher SES families can wait longer for returns, have financial buffers, see longer education as worthwhile, lower SES families can't necessarily do that
charter school
when a government body funds an independent school in exchange for offering a special theme or meeting various performance indicators
class struggle
a contest for power or rewards vetween social classes, often the capitalists/ownership class vs working class
collective effervescence
momentary state in which social interaction creastes intense shared experience in which people deepen their emotional attatchemtns