1/32
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
SN2 rate law
Rate = k[substrate][Nu]. 2nd order, bimolecular, one concerted step with no intermediate
SN2 mechanism
Backside attack. Bond making and breaking are simultaneous through a single transition state
SN2 stereochemistry
100% inversion at the electrophilic carbon (stereospecific). Other stereocenters are unaffected
SN2 substrate reactivity
methyl > 1° > 2° >> 3° (3° negligible). Branching at the alpha carbon causes steric hindrance
Leaving group ability
Weaker base = better LG (conjugate base of a strong acid). Cl- < Br- < I-. Sulfonates (OTs, OMs, triflate) are excellent. OH- is poor
Nucleophilicity trends
More negative > neutral (HO- > H2O, H2N- > NH3). Increases to the left in a period (H2N- > HO- > F-) and down a group
Steric effect on the nucleophile
Bulkier Nu = worse nucleophile, e.g. CH3O- > (CH3)3CO- and (CH3)2NH > [(CH3)2CH]2NH
Which sterics matter most in SN2?
Sterics around the electrophilic carbon (alpha carbon) are the most significant
Protic solvent effect on Nu
Solvent H-bonds to Nu- (ion-dipole shell), which impedes it. Small, charged Nu- are affected most
Nucleophilicity order in protic solvents
I- > Br- > Cl- > F-. F- is heavily solvated even though it is the most basic
Nucleophilicity order in aprotic solvents
Follows basicity: F- > Cl- > Br- > I- ("naked" anions)
Best solvents for SN2
Polar aprotic (DMSO, DMF, acetone, acetonitrile, HMPA). They dissolve salts without H-bonding, giving rate increases of about 10^6 vs methanol
Protic vs aprotic solvent
Protic has an acidic H (O-H, N-H) and can H-bond (H2O, ROH). Aprotic has no acidic H
SN1 rate law
Rate = k[substrate]. 1st order, unimolecular
SN1 rate-determining step
Step 1: leaving group departs to form the carbocation
SN1 steps with an anionic nucleophile
2 steps: (1) LG leaves to give a carbocation, (2) Nu attacks
SN1 steps with a neutral nucleophile
3 steps: (1) LG leaves, (2) Nu attacks to give an oxonium ion, (3) proton transfer to a base gives the neutral product
Solvolysis
SN1 where the solvent is the nucleophile (neutral, weak, polar protic). Hydrolysis = H2O, ethanolysis = EtOH, acidolysis = HCO2H
SN1 stereochemistry
Planar sp2 carbocation is attacked from either face, giving racemization (50:50 R/S, optically inactive)
Polar protic solvent effect on SN1
Stabilizes the polar transition state and the carbocation/ion pair, lowering the activation energy and speeding the reaction
SN1 substrate reactivity
3° > 2° >> 1° > methyl. Primary and methyl give no SN1
Carbocation stability
3° > 2° > 1° > methyl. Benzylic and allylic cations are also stabilized by resonance
Hyperconjugation
Donation of electron density from adjacent C-H or C-C sigma bonds into the empty p orbital. It is why more substituted cations are more stable
Carbocation rearrangement
1,2-hydride or methyl shift to form a more stable cation (2° to 3°). It can change the site of attack and give an unexpected product
When to watch for rearrangement
Any SN1/unimolecular reaction where a 2° cation sits next to a carbon with an H or methyl that would give a 3° cation
Tertiary alkyl halide mechanism
SN1 only (too hindered for SN2)
Primary alkyl halide mechanism
SN2 only (cannot stabilize a carbocation)
Secondary alkyl halide mechanism
Either SN1 or SN2, depending on solvent, leaving group, and nucleophile
Conditions that favor SN1
Very good LG, poor (neutral) nucleophile, polar protic solvent
Conditions that favor SN2
Reasonable LG, good (anionic) nucleophile, polar aprotic solvent
2-bromopropane + CH3SNa in acetone
SN2 (2° halide, strong nucleophile, polar aprotic solvent)
2° triflate (OSO2CF3) + CH3OH
SN1 (excellent LG, weak neutral Nu, polar protic solvent)
SN2 vs SN1 stereochemical outcome
SN2 = inversion. SN1 = racemization