Classical Conditioning II - Vocabulary Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/33

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering key terms and concepts from Week 3 Classical Conditioning II lecture notes.

Last updated 6:38 AM on 8/11/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

34 Terms

1
New cards

Contiguity

Temporal closeness between the CS and US; facilitates learning but is not by itself sufficient for conditioning.

2
New cards

Contingency

The predictive relationship between the CS and US; stronger learning when the CS reliably predicts the US.

3
New cards

CS pre-exposure (latent inhibition)

Pre-exposure to the CS alone reduces subsequent conditioning; the CS becomes less effective as a predictor.

4
New cards

US pre-exposure (habituation)

Repeated exposure to the US reduces its salience, weakening CS–US learning.

5
New cards

Partial reinforcement

Training with intermittent (partial) reinforcement leads to weaker conditioned responding than continuous reinforcement.

6
New cards

Degraded contingency

A weakened predictive relationship between CS and US, leading to weaker learning.

7
New cards

CS post-exposure (extinction)

Exposing the CS after conditioning without the US to reduce the CR.

8
New cards

US post-exposure (retroactive interference)

Repeated US presentations after learning interfere with the original CS–US memory, weakening the CS response.

9
New cards

Overshadowing

A more salient cue dominates learning, reducing the ability of a less salient cue to become a CS when both are presented with the US.

10
New cards

Blocking

Prior learning about one CS reduces or blocks learning about a new CS when it is paired with the US.

11
New cards

Latent inhibition

Another term for CS pre-exposure; learning about a CS is slower after prior non-reinforced exposure.

12
New cards

Garcia & Koelling’s Belongingness (relevance) principle

Some CS–US pairings are learned more readily due to evolutionary predispositions (e.g., taste with illness vs. shock with light).

13
New cards

Higher-Order Conditioning (HOC)

Learning where a CS is paired with another CS rather than directly with a US, producing a CR to the second-order CS.

14
New cards

Second-Order Conditioning (SOC)

A CS is conditioned by being paired with another CS that has already become a CS for the US.

15
New cards

Sensory Preconditioning (SPC)

Two neutral stimuli are paired before any US is involved; later one is trained with the US, making the other CS evoke the CR.

16
New cards

Stimulus–Stimulus (S–S) learning

Learning where the CS elicits a response by activating an internal representation of the US (expectancy).

17
New cards

Stimulus–Response (S–R) learning

Learning where the CS directly elicits a response without mediating US expectancy.

18
New cards

US Devaluation

Changing the value of the US after learning to test whether the CS–CR depends on the US’s current value.

19
New cards

Extinction (in SOC/SPC contexts)

Reduction of conditioned responding when the CS is no longer paired with the US; in some SOC studies, extinction of first-order CS does not abolish the second-order response.

20
New cards

OC (Occasion Setting)

A third event (an occasion setter) modulates whether a CS–US association will be effective, rather than directly signaling the US.

21
New cards

Positive Occasion Setting

An OS that allows one cue to facilitate the CS–US relationship (A–X+ / X− in the diagram).

22
New cards

Negative Occasion Setting

An OS that inhibits the CS–US relationship under certain conditions (A−X+/X− patterns).

23
New cards

Contextual cues

Diffuse cues from the environment (not discrete stimuli) that influence conditioning and can act as conditioned excitors or inhibitors.

24
New cards

Contextual conditioned excitors

Contexts that come to evoke conditioned responses because they have become associated with the US or CS–US contingencies.

25
New cards

Contextual conditioned inhibitors

Contexts that reduce conditioned responding and can pass retardation and summation tests.

26
New cards

Retardation of conditioning test

A test to identify conditioned inhibitors by checking if learning about a context as an inhibitor is slowed when paired with the CS.

27
New cards

Summation test

A test to identify conditioned inhibitors by seeing if a cue reduces responding when added to a known excitor.

28
New cards

Pavlov’s Stimulus Substitution Model

Idea that the CS substitutes for the US in the brain, so the CS evokes a response similar to the US.

29
New cards

CS Identity

The specific sensory modality or identity of the CS; evidence against simple substitution in some studies.

30
New cards

US Identity

The specific nature of the US; its preserved identity can influence learning patterns and substitution assumptions.

31
New cards

CS–US Interval

The timing between CS onset and US onset; a key variable influencing learning rate and strength.

32
New cards

Evolutionary predispositions

Innate tendencies that make certain CS–US pairings more easily learned due to biological relevance.

33
New cards

Salience

The prominence or noticeability of a stimulus; higher salience facilitates faster learning.

34
New cards

Novelty

New or surprising stimuli that can enhance learning by increasing attention to the CS.