LAW-240 Midterm Study Guide

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/82

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards for LAW-240 Midterm covering foundations of law, the civil lawsuit process, dispute resolution, intentional and business torts, negligence, strict product liability, and tort damages.

Last updated 6:56 AM on 10/8/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

83 Terms

1
New cards

Constitution

The highest source of law; conflicting laws are invalid.

2
New cards

Statutes

Laws passed by the legislature.

3
New cards

Administrative Law

Rules and regulations made by government agencies.

4
New cards

Common Law

Judge-made laws based on prior court decisions.

5
New cards

Precedent

Using previous court decisions to guide future cases.

6
New cards

Stare Decisis

Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand," expressing the principle that courts generally follow precedents to provide consistency and predictability.

7
New cards

Legislative Branch

The branch of government (Congress) responsible for making laws.

8
New cards

Executive Branch

The branch of government (the President) responsible for enforcing laws.

9
New cards

Judicial Branch

The branch of government (the Courts) responsible for interpreting laws.

10
New cards

Criminal Law

Legal branch where the government prosecutes and punishes conduct harmful to society.

11
New cards

Civil Law

Legal branch where a private party sues another party to seek money or another remedy.

12
New cards

Plaintiff

The person or party filing a lawsuit.

13
New cards

Defendant

The person or party being sued or prosecuted.

14
New cards

Legal Positivism

A legal philosophy holding that law is valid simply because it is government-made.

15
New cards

Natural Law

A legal philosophy asserting that an unjust law is not truly valid.

16
New cards

Legal Realism

A legal philosophy arguing that what actually occurs in courts and enforcement matters more than written rules.

17
New cards

Bystander Rule

The general rule that an individual usually has no duty to rescue a stranger, unless exceptions apply such as creating the danger or having a special relationship.

18
New cards

Veto Override

The action of Congress overturning a presidential veto, requiring a 2/3 vote in both the House and the Senate.

19
New cards

Subpoena

A legal order requiring an individual to testify or provide evidence.

20
New cards

FOIA (Freedom of Information Act)

A law providing public access to government records to prevent agency secrecy and hold agencies accountable.

21
New cards

Jurisdiction

A court's official power to handle a case, or the specific geographic area where that power is allowed to be exercised.

22
New cards

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

A court's legal authority to hear specific types of cases (addressing what the case is about).

23
New cards

Personal Jurisdiction

A court's legal authority over the specific people or companies involved in a lawsuit (addressing who is being sued).

24
New cards

Federal Question Jurisdiction

Federal court jurisdiction arising when a case involves the U.S. Constitution, federal statutory law, or federal treaties.

25
New cards

Diversity Jurisdiction

Federal court jurisdiction where the parties are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.

26
New cards

Complaint

The initial pleading filed by the plaintiff stating the factual allegations and claims against the defendant.

27
New cards

Answer

The defendant's official written response to the plaintiff's complaint.

28
New cards

Counterclaim

A claim made by the defendant suing the plaintiff within the same lawsuit.

29
New cards

Default Judgment

A ruling entered against a defendant resulting from a failure to file a timely answer to the complaint.

30
New cards

Interrogatories

A discovery method involving written questions submitted to another party that must be answered in writing.

31
New cards

Depositions

A discovery method involving oral questioning of a witness or party under oath prior to trial.

32
New cards

Voir Dire

The jury selection process of questioning potential jurors to determine their fitness to serve.

33
New cards

Appellant

The party who files an appeal asking a higher court to review a lower court's decision.

34
New cards

Appellee (Appelle)

The party responding to an appeal filed by the appellant.

35
New cards

Certiorari

A formal petition or procedure used to request that the U.S. Supreme Court review a case.

36
New cards

Motion to Dismiss

A formal request asking the judge to terminate a case because of an inherent legal defect.

37
New cards

Summary Judgment

A motion asking the judge to decide the case immediately without a trial because the essential facts are undisputed.

38
New cards

JNOV (Judgement Non Obstante Veredicto)

A post-trial motion asking the judge to overturn or ignore the jury's verdict because it directly contradicts the law or evidence.

39
New cards

Preponderance of the Evidence

The standard burden of proof in civil lawsuits, requiring that the claim is more likely true than not (greater than 50% probability).

40
New cards

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The burden of proof in criminal trials, requiring near-certain evidence such that there is no logical explanation other than the defendant's guilt.

41
New cards

Negotiation

An alternative dispute resolution method where the disputing parties communicate directly to reach a resolution.

42
New cards

Mediation

An alternative dispute resolution process where a neutral third party facilitates voluntary settlement without issuing a binding decision.

43
New cards

Arbitration

A formal alternative dispute resolution method where a neutral third party renders a typically binding decision, limiting traditional court and jury access.

44
New cards

Tort

A civil wrong that causes legally recognized harm or injury.

45
New cards

Defamation

A false, unprivileged statement communicated to a third party that causes injury to another's reputation.

46
New cards

Libel

Defamation expressed in written or published form.

47
New cards

Slander

Defamation expressed orally or spoken to a third person.

48
New cards

Actual Malice

The legal standard required for public officials and public figures in defamation claims, proving knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of the truth.

49
New cards

Battery

An intentional tort consisting of actual harmful or offensive physical contact with another person.

50
New cards

Assault

An intentional tort involving the intentional creation of fear or reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact.

51
New cards

False Imprisonment

The intentional and unreasonable restraint of another person's physical freedom without consent or legal justification.

52
New cards

IIED (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)

An intentional tort characterized by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally causing severe emotional distress.

53
New cards

Trespass

The intentional, unauthorized entry onto another person's real property or land.

54
New cards

Conversion

The intentional, unauthorized taking or exercise of dominion over someone else's personal property.

55
New cards

Fraud

Intentional deception or misrepresentation calculated to induce reliance and cause legal injury.

56
New cards

Tortious Interference with Contract

Improperly and intentionally causing a party to breach an existing, valid contract with another party.

57
New cards

Tortious Interference with Prospective Advantage

Improper interference with a probable or prospective economic or business relationship of another party.

58
New cards

Lanham Act

A federal law prohibiting false or misleading commercial advertising and marketing that injures a business.

59
New cards

Factual Cause

The "but for" causation test in negligence: but for the defendant's conduct, would the harm have occurred?

60
New cards

Proximate Cause

Legal causation establishing that the harm suffered by the plaintiff was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant's breach.

61
New cards

Superseding Cause

An unforeseeable intervening event that breaks the causal chain between the defendant's act and the injury, cutting off legal liability.

62
New cards

Negligence Per Se

A doctrine where the violation of a safety statute automatically establishes a breach of duty if the statute was designed to prevent that specific type of harm to that class of plaintiff.

63
New cards

Res Ipsa Loquitur

Latin phrase meaning "the thing speaks for itself," a doctrine allowing negligence to be inferred from the very nature of the accident without direct proof.

64
New cards

Trespasser

A person on land without consent; landowners owe the lowest legal duty of care to adult trespassers.

65
New cards

Licensee

A social guest on land; the landowner owes a duty to warn them about known, hidden dangers.

66
New cards

Invitee

A customer or business visitor; landowners owe the highest duty of care, including reasonable inspection and protection from dangers.

67
New cards

Attractive Nuisance

A dangerous man-made condition on land likely to attract children that can impose liability on a landowner if a child is injured.

68
New cards

Contributory Negligence

A traditional defense stating that if a plaintiff is even slightly at fault for their own injuries, they are completely barred from recovery.

69
New cards

Comparative Negligence

A legal defense where damages are proportionally reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff.

70
New cards

Assumption of Risk

A defense showing that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily accepted the obvious and ordinary hazards of an activity.

71
New cards

Strict Liability

Legal liability that is imposed regardless of intent, negligence, or fault.

72
New cards

Ultrahazardous Activity

An activity carrying an inherently extreme risk of harm that cannot be eliminated through the exercise of reasonable care (e.g., using explosives).

73
New cards

Strict Product Liability

Holding commercial sellers liable when a product is defective and unreasonably dangerous upon reaching the consumer without substantial alteration, regardless of privity.

74
New cards

Design Defect

A product defect where the intrinsic blueprint or design of the product creates an unreasonable hazard, making it dangerously designed.

75
New cards

Manufacturing Defect

A defect occurring when a product departs from its safe, intended design during the production process.

76
New cards

Failure to Warn

A product defect arising when a manufacturer fails to provide adequate instructions or warnings about foreseeable hazards.

77
New cards

Consumer Expectation Test

A design defect test evaluating whether a product is less safe than an ordinary, reasonable consumer would expect under normal use.

78
New cards

Risk-Utility Test

A design defect test determining whether the societal and economic benefits of a product's design outweigh its inherent hazards and risks.

79
New cards

Statute of Limitations

A statutory time limit for initiating a legal proceeding, where the clock typically begins when the injury or defect is discovered or should have been discovered.

80
New cards

Statute of Repose

An absolute legal deadline barring claims after a fixed period from when a product was manufactured or sold, regardless of when injury occurred or was discovered.

81
New cards

Compensatory Damages

Financial damages awarded to make the injured party whole by covering past and future losses such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

82
New cards

Single Recovery Principle

A rule mandating that a plaintiff receive a single lump-sum award intended to cover all past, present, and anticipated future injuries and damages.

83
New cards

Punitive Damages

Damages awarded in excess of compensatory damages specifically designed to punish extreme, outrageous conduct and deter similar actions in the future.