1/121
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Best to worst for duration
LTM, STM, Echoic, Iconic
Best to worst for capacity
LTM, Sensory memory, STM
Sensory Memory
1. decays rapidly (varies by modality)
2. has large capacity
3. stores sensory information (not semantic)
4. NOT related to attention
Echoic
duration: ~10 seconds
auditory sensory memory: Say what? But catch what the person said before they repeat it
iconic
Sperling: flashing letters
duration: ~300- 500 milliseconds
Metacontrast Masking
Sperling letters but overwritten by the "O" coming up
taking over sensory image
Whole vs. Partial Report Task
partial has a smaller response set
Duration of STM
duration: ~ 15-20 seconds
(without rehearsal)
Capacity of STM
Miller: 7 (+ or - 2)
Luck and Vogel: 4
Chunking
group together (connected items or words) so that they can be stored or processed as single concepts
4 items
Items or amount of info?
all about amount of info
Think Hard drive- not thinking about how many pictures I can fit b/c depends on quality (size) of photos
Components of WM
i) Central Executive
ii) Visuospatial Sketch Pad
iii) Phonological Loop
Working Memory
Highlights the fact that manipulation of the information can take place in STM
WM has trouble when...
similar types of information are presented at the same time
Phonological Loop
verbal and auditory info
Visuospatial sketch pad
visual and spatial info
central executive
coordinates activity between the two
where the "work" happens
phonological similarity effects
when phonologically similar (ex) hop, top, pot), we don't remember as well
word length effect
People are better at remembering shorter words
takes longer to rehearse longer words
Articulatory Suppression
inability to rehearse words so word length effect goes away
suggests you are rehearsing these words and that's why longer words are harder to remember
episodic buffer
backup store that communicates with LTM and WM components
hold info longer and has greater capacity than phonological loop or visuospatial sketch pad
testing anxiety and working memory
When you have test anxiety, it actually is using your WM capacity, therefore it interrupts your ability to do well on whatever test you're doing
LTM capacity
largest store
LTM duration
from minutes to years
Serial Position curve
Curve you get when you ask people to read a list of words and then write down all the words they remember
primacy effect
people are better at remembering words at the beginning of the list
have time to rehearse the words and encode in LTM without interference
recency effect
people are better at remembering words at the end of the list
just heard them
Got rid of recency effect?
People had a 30 second delay with another verbal task at end, couldn't keep words in STM
Susceptibility- LTM vs. STM
LTM- longer lasting and susceptible to semantic interference
STM- susceptible to rapid decay and phonological interference
decrease proactive interference?
when present a different category of stimuli.
Once you switch the category of items, proactive interference goes away
retrograde amnesia
loss of memory fro events prior to the trauma
strongest for things that happened closest to accident (can't remember most recent things)
anterograde amnesia
inability to make new LTM
patient H.M.
Had Seizures
According to surgeon- entire hippocampus in each hemisphere removed
Bilateral Medial Temporal Lobectomy (1953)
After surgery:
i) Above normal intelligence
ii) Normal Short-term memory
iii) Severe Anterograde amnesia
iv) Retrograde amnesia for ~ 3 years before surgery (more distant memories were not affected)
Clive Wearing
musician
showed the hippocampus is responsible for ones ability to encode new long-term memories
did not lose procedural memory
Patient K.F.
damage near the Left Sylvian Fissure, had STM deficits (digit span of 2; reduced Recency effect) without LTM deficits.
Different area of brain damage
declarative/ explicit memory
memory that you can declare; have knowledge of that you can explain
Episodic
1. Tell me about your birthday party
2. Event that you're remembering
Semantic
1. What is the capital of Delaware
2. Where were you born
Evidence that episodic and semantic are separate...
1. K.C. damaged hippocampus
a. No episodic memory, cannot relive any events of his past
b. Semantic memory intact, can remember general information about the past
2. Italian woman
A. Impaired semantic memory
B. Episodic memory for past events was preserved
Evidence that episodic and semantic interact...
Both occur together in Autobiographical memories
a) Episodic can be lost while semantic is retained
Episodic can improve semantic
a) Recall of actors names
Relate facts to events in your own life
a) Semantic can change experience/episodic memory
Remember/ know procedure: forgetting is not all or none
Remember if a stimulus is familiar and the circumstance under which it was encountered?
Know if the stimulus is familiar but don't remember experiencing it earlier?
Don't remember the stimulus at all
semanticization of memory
loss of episodic details for memories of long-ago events
"remember"
episodic
"know"
semantic
implicit memory
memory that cannot be verbally reported
not LTM dependent
Procedural memory
1. Depends on extensive and repeated experience
2. Experimentally it is often measured with the serial RT task kind of like Simon, but sometimes the sequences would repeat
3. Amnesic can learn, despite not remembering ever doing the task.
4. Parkinson's and Huntington's patients show impairment
Priming
1. Perceptual
2. Conceptual
3. Semantic
*amnesiacs show normal priming effects
perceptual priming
Usually related to actual perceptual systems
Tulving Study
a) People are better able to fill in word fragments for words they've seen before
b) Accuracy
Conceptual Priming
What is a man's name that starts with H? P?
class said Henry and Peter because we had heard them earlier in lecture
Semantic priming
categories
ex) "dog" can prime "wolf"
repetition priming
improvements in a behavioral response when stimuli are repeatedly presented. The improvements can be measured in terms of accuracy or reaction time, and can occur when the repeated stimuli are either identical or similar to previous stimuli
Tulving Study: perceptual priming
a) Giant list of words
b) Had to fill in empty spaces
c) People were not very good at filling them in without implicit memory (they were looking at accuracy)
d) 3 phases: Learning phase & test phase (1hr)
e) & test phase (7 days later)
f) On of lures in first memory test, they were more likely to get it in the 7 hr test
g) Priming lasted longer than word recognition
i) Evidence for something other than recognition memory
Real Life Priming
a) People who were deliberately trying to memorize ads did better
b) In deliberate and coincidental, they both had an effect on how they rated the advertisement later
c) The lower they are, the more eye catching
d) Things that they had seen were rated as more appealing (because they were familiar in an implicit way)
habituation
Repeated non nocuous stimulus, you can ignore it after a while
ex)after a while on a boat you don't feel the motion as much
Sensitization
as you repeat, it gets worse
ex) after the 20th umm or like it will start to drive you crazy
steps of LTM encoding (in order)
acquisition, rehearsal, consolidation and retrieval
acquisition
getting into STM
consolidation
stabilizing over a longer time period
retrieval
Process of transferring info from LTM back into working memory (consciousness)
Most of our failures of memory are failures to retrieve
rehearsal
maintenance- STM
elaborative- LTM
elaborative rehearsal
Thinking about the meaning
Make connections to something you already know
shallow processing
little attention to meaning
focus on physical features
poor memory
circular reasoning
The more you interact with the material, the deeper it will be
organization and categorization
Fruit and occupation list, when recalling automatically say words in their categories
Laundry passage
complex sentences
Like memory palace - more bizarre and more detail, better memory
More vivid/ visual imagery
visual imagery
boat/tree word pairing
to remember the words, visualize a boat on top of a tree
personal connection
connect what you are memorizing to something meaningful to you
generation
Generating material yourself, rather than rereading
Blank outline
testing effect
taking a practice exam
how to improve retrieval?
Matching environment between encoding and retrieving
Transfer-appropriate processing
Transfer Appropriate processing
phenomenon whereby the results of a memory task will be better if the type of processing used during encoding is the same as the type during retrieval
Matching encoding with matching testing will lead to better results
All about type of encoding and type of testing (actual task)
context clues
matching environmental context; study in same place you take the test you will do better
encoding specificity
a. Study words underwater vs. study words on land
b. People who encoded words underwater did better when tested under the water
c. All about the environment
d. Quiet studiers did better when tested in quiet
e. Noise studiers did better when tested in noise
state-dependent learning
a. Made half people feel sad and half people feel happy
b. People who were sad when they learned, did better when they were sad when they were tested
All about mood
cued- recall
cue- presented to aid recall
increased performance over free-recall
retrieval cues most effective when created by the person who uses them
consolidation
transforms new memories from fragile state to more permanent state
graded amnesia
memory for recent events is more fragile than for remote events
sleep effect: consolidation
Reactivation process is important for consolidation and begins as soon as the memory is formed, but it is particularly strong during sleep.
English-German Vocab pairs
Group 1- went to sleep within 3 hours
Group 2- Stayed awake for 10 hours then slept a normal night
People who went to sleep right away did much better
expectation effect: consolidation
Depends on whether you're expected to be tested on material
Expected group did better
Mnemonic similarity task
used to study pattern separation--picture task from class
Pattern separation
the ability to see highly similar things but recognize them as diff object-- calling a lure "similar "
age related to deficit in pattern separation?
gets worse as you get older
deficit due to conceptual or perceptual interference?
The age related deficit in pattern separation ability seems to be due to perceptual ability
have intact semantic memory, might just be slower processing
perceptual interference
non-nameable objects
conceptual interference
objects that perform the same task
e.g. dry measuring cup changes to liquid measuring cup
pattern completion
retrieval on an item based on a partial cue-- calling a lure "old"
pattern separation dependent on...
connections b/w entorhinal cortex and hippocampus
Alzheimer's brain
brain w/ a lot of tissue loss, especially beginning in medial temporal lobe
Stephanie's task relies on entorhinal and hippocampus so affected individuals wont do as well
Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm
a procedure in cognitive psychology used to study false memory in humans
in which subjects are presented with lists of semantically related words (e.g., nurse, hospital, etc.) at encoding. After a delay, subjects are asked to recall or recognize these words. In the recognition memory version of the task, subjects are asked whether they remember previously presented words, as well as related (but never presented) critical lure words ('doctor').
Why does the DRM paradigm create false memories?
because the words from each list were associated with a missing key word. When you try to reconstruct the list, your memory recreates all of the associated information, even information that wasn't experienced
need for false memory to occur?
familiarity with category term
Without prior knowledge of "anger", this effect would not appear; false memory resulted from top-down processing/schemas.
looming cognitive style (LCS)
People with this style think of threats as rapidly approaching them in space/time
Approaching threats are more threatening.
LCS associated with?
anxiety, biased memory for threatening information, and sensitivity to approach movement
stimuli of John's research
image movement
methods of John's research
i. Encoding:
1. Threating and non-threatening animals
2. Approaching and receding
ii. Recognition test:
1. Old or new?
2. If old, approaching or receding?
Results of John's research
When anxious participants falsely recognized threatening images, those with high LCS remembered them as approaching more often than those with low LCS. This was not the case with nonthreatening images.
Participants high in LCS and anxiety remembered images they'd never seen before as approaching more often if the image was threatening than if the image was nonthreatening
Conclusions of John's research
Anxious individuals with maladaptive cognitive styles like the LCS apply threatening characteristics (approach movement) to their false memories. ◦ This is only the case for threatening information.
It is possible that this effect extends into everyday life, with top-down processing leading to distortions which reinforce anxiety.
forgetting can be good?
yes; we would always be in a state of regret
If unable to forget, intrusive memories may keep us from being able to focus well on the current stimuli. Painful memories may seem as fresh and raw as if they just happened.
hyperthymesia
Can't forget
One confirmed case in 2007
"forgetfulness is a form of freedom"
Patient AJ (Jill Price)
Jill Price recall everything and is unable to forget anything.
Mundane memories are always accessible, forming a "running movie" simultaneously with current experiences.