Impact of Third-Party Candidates in the 2016 Presidential Election

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering the impact of third-party candidates in swing states during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

6 Terms

1
New cards

Jill Stein and Gary Johnson

The third-party presidential candidates in 2016 whose combined vote counts in key swing states exceeded Donald Trump's margin of victory over Hillary Clinton.

2
New cards

Michigan 2016 Presidential Election Margins

The state election outcome where Donald Trump won by a margin of +11,837+11{,}837 votes, while Jill Stein and Gary Johnson together received 223,707223{,}707 votes.

3
New cards

Pennsylvania 2016 Presidential Election Margins

The state election outcome where Donald Trump won by a margin of +68,236+68{,}236 votes, while third-party candidates Jill Stein and Gary Johnson earned 191,565191{,}565 votes.

4
New cards

Wisconsin 2016 Presidential Election Margins

The state election outcome where Donald Trump won by a margin of +27,257+27{,}257 votes, compared to 137,422137{,}422 votes cast for third-party candidates Jill Stein and Gary Johnson.

5
New cards

Third-Party Vote Absorption Strategy

A campaign tactic where major-party presidential candidates adopt platform issues that are popular with third-party voters to pull votes away from minor-party contenders.

6
New cards

70%70\% Third-Party Reallocation Scenario

A hypothetical model in which Hillary Clinton receives 70%70\% of the Stein/Johnson vote, leading her to carry Michigan (2.422.42 million to 2.352.35 million), Pennsylvania (2.982.98 million to 2.972.97 million), and Wisconsin (1.471.47 million to 1.461.46 million).