1/12
UCP
what is SAD
marked fear or anxiety about a social situation, out of proportion to the actual threat
situations avoided, or endured with intense fear
causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, etc areas
persistent for over 6 months
fear of future possible threats and their uncontrollability
symptoms
emotional → fear of doing or saying something that will result in embarrassment, humiliation, or rejection by others
physical → fear of blushing, sweating, shaking, or looking nervous
cognitive → fear of seeming boring, stupid, or strange
prevalence and onset
lifetime prevalence of ~12% in adults
women are more likely to have it (or report having it)
present in 0.8% of British 5-19 year olds in 2107, up from 0.32% in 1999
theoretically happens in adolescence, however some signs may be present earlier
lower prevalence in collectivist societies
outcomes
risks of:
substance misuse
depression
limiting prospects on professional life
effect on relationships
comorbidity
criteria for children
anxiety must occur in peer settings not just during interactions with adults
may be expressed by crying, tantrums, freezing, clinging, shrinking, or failing to speak in social situations
fear is irrational and out of proportion
possible causes of SAD
genetic → meta-analysis of twin studies produced a mean heritability of 0.65
early environment → some evidence that early parenting stereotypes can increase the risk, mainly overprotection and modelling of social avoidance
early shaming experiences → parents and other authority figures may increase the effect of a negative appraisal
evolutionary model of SAD
group living is advantageous for survival
groups need stability to function, requiring a system for problem solving
don’t want to be excluded from the group
affiliation system
based on trust and cooperation between individuals
increases social bonds and relationships
in humans associated to ‘need to belong’ proposed by Maslow
exclusion and rejection from a valued group is a harsh punishment, and one of the most feared aspects of rejection
social rank system
present in most systems that live in groups
fights and aggression between members of the same group is costly to individuals and groups
allows distribution of resources without the need for aggression and competition
primates and humans have the ability to monitor social status
guide appropriate behaviour and regulate interactions
guides individuals about acceptable actions in different ranks of the group structure
SAD from POV of evolution
response is designed to prevent social rejection or exclusion
by monitoring and correcting the behaviour we can function within the norms of the group
SAD is an oversensitive system that does not stop when it should, when the threat is no longer present
Heimberg model - cog behavioural
focuses on factors that increase and maintain SAD in individuals
assumption that other people are always evaluating you
assumption the audience has very high standards
evaluation judged as very negative and very important
cognitive model - Clark and Wells
people with SAD think they have social skill deficits, but it may actually be an issue with cognitive appraisal
these beliefs cause them to act and think in ways that maintain the anxiety
situation appraised as dangerous, so person engages in safety mechanisms to attenuate negative feelings
these factors feedback the situation as even worse, reinforcing the negative appraisal
treatment
according to NICE guidelines
individual CBT based on cognitive models
medication potions available
psychoeducation
systematic training in externally focused self-attention
modification of pre/post event processing