PSYC2012 - Chapter 4 - Social Perception

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/46

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 10:55 PM on 10/6/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

47 Terms

1
New cards

Impression formation

the forming of the first knowledge that a person has concerning another person

2
New cards

What do people base their initial impressions of others on?

Facial features, stereotypes, at times false information

3
New cards

Thin-slicing

Drawing meaningful conclusions about other people based off of extremely brief samples of behavior

4
New cards

Nonverbal communication

The way in which people communicate, intentionally or unintentionally, without words. (Tone of voice, eye movements, body posture)

5
New cards

What are the six universal emotions?

Joy, fear, sadness, anger, disgust, and surprise (WATCH INSIDE OUT)

6
New cards

What is the purpose of nonverbal communication?

To express emotions and personality and convey attitudes while not speaking

7
New cards

Encode

to express or emit nonverbal behavior, such as smiling or patting someone on the back

8
New cards

Decode

to interpret the meaning of the nonverbal behavior other people express, such as deciding that a pat on the back was an expression of kindness

9
New cards

What did Charles Darwin propose about facial expressions?

That they were vestiges (structures with lost usages) that were once useful physiological reactions. For instance, if someone ate something that tasted terrible, they'd wrinkle their face and then eject the food from their mouths.

10
New cards

Affect blends

facial expressions in which one part of the face registers one emotion while another part of the face registers a different emotion

11
New cards

Display rules

cross-cultural guidelines for how and when to express emotions

12
New cards

Belief preserverance

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them

13
New cards

Emblems

nonverbal gestures that have well-understood definitions within a given culture; they usually have direct verbal translations, such as the OK sign

14
New cards

What did David Matsumoto's trip to the Olympics reveal about the nature of facial expressions when comparing blind athletes with sighted athletes

That the placement of their bone structures were the same when they won and when they lost respectively; proves that facial expressions are innate

15
New cards

Emotional labor

Expressing and regulating emotions so that they are organizationally desirable in work environments is common in our social world.

16
New cards

Surface acting

hiding one's inner feelings and faking emotional expressions in response to display rules

17
New cards

Deep acting

trying to modify one's true inner feelings based on display rules

18
New cards

What types of jobs are more likely to succumb to emotional labor?

Interpersonal ones that involve interacting with people outside of the work environment (teachers, Disneyland employees, etc)

19
New cards

What can emotional labor lead to in terms of one's perception of their job?

Leads to decreased enjoyment of job, lower self-esteem, and more sick days due to emotional drainage

20
New cards

Attribution theories

theories designed to explain how people determine the causes of behavior, whether it be their own behavior or someone else's

21
New cards

Given that facial expression is a key component of nonverbal communication, how do people with facial paralysis communicate?

By relying on communication strategies such as expressive words, hand gestures, and laughter

22
New cards

Primacy effect

In terms of impression formation, traits that are listed first tend to have more of an influence than ones that are listed later

23
New cards

internal attribution

attributing the cause of a person's behavior to an internal personality trait or disposition

24
New cards

External attribution

explaining someone's behavior by referring to the situation

25
New cards

Covariation model

a theory that states that to form an attribution about what caused a person's behavior, we systematically note the pattern between the presence or absence of possible causal factors and whether the behavior occurs

26
New cards

What are the three parts of the covariation model?

consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency

27
New cards

Consensus information

information about the extent to which other people behave the same way toward the same stimulus as the actor does. Do other people behave in the same way?

HIGH = yes, situational (environment)

LOW = no, dispositional (personality)

28
New cards

Distinctive information

The extent to which a particular actor behaves in the same way toward different stimuli. Is the behavior unique to the stimuli?

HIGH = yes, situational (environment)

LOW = no, dispositional (personality)

29
New cards

Consistency information (Kelley)

The extent to which the behavior between one actor and one stimulus is the same across time and circumstances. How frequently does this person engage in this behavior in this situation?

HIGH = Always, dispositional

LOW = Unknown; something unusual is going in the situation

30
New cards

According to Kelley's theory, it is hard to make any sort of straightforward attribution when ______ is low

Consistency**

31
New cards

People are more likely to make an internal attribution when ___ and ____ are low

Consensus and distinctiveness

32
New cards

Fundamental attribution error (correspondence error)

the tendency for observers, when analyzing another's behavior, to underestimate the impact of the situation and to overestimate the impact of personal disposition

33
New cards

Perceptual salience

How certain pieces of information stand out and grab our attention.

34
New cards

Two-Step Attribution Process

analyzing another person's behavior first by making an automatic internal attribution and only then thinking about possible situational reasons for the behavior, after which one may adjust the original internal attribution

35
New cards

Self-serving attributions

explanations for one's successes that credit internal, dispositional factors and explanations for one's failures that blame external, situational factors

36
New cards

Belief in a just world

A form of defensive attribution wherein people assume that bad things happen to bad people and that good things happen to good people

37
New cards

Bias blind spot

the tendency to think that other people are more susceptible to attributional biases in their thinking than we are

38
New cards

Holistic Thinking Style

a type of thinking in which people focus on the overall context, particularly the ways in which objects relate to each other; this type of thinking is common in East Asian cultures

39
New cards

Analytic Thinking Style

A type of thinking in which people focus on the properties of objects without considering their surrounding context; this type of thinking is common in Western cultures

40
New cards

People in ______ cultures tend to prefer dispositional attributions

Western, individualistic

41
New cards

People in ______ cultures tend to prefer situational attributions

Eastern, collectivist

42
New cards

Actor-observer bias

the tendency to blame our actions on the situation and blame the actions of others on their disposition. More common with failures

43
New cards

Infromation access

Actors having more information about themselves than do observers (e.g., how consistent a present behavior is to past behavior)

44
New cards

Motivational bias

Desire to maintain and improve one's self esteem

45
New cards

I

46
New cards

2 step attributional process

analyzing behavior first by making an automatic internal attribution & then only thinking about possible situational reasons for the behavior

47
New cards

bias blind spot:

The tendency to think that other people are more susceptible to attributional biases in their thinking than we are