1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Persuasion
process by which a message induces change in beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors
persuasion is a process that can be aimed to induce positive changes (such as toward a healthier life) OR negative (such as Nazi propaganda)
the topic of persuasion was originally studied by Yale professor Carl Hovland during World War II in order to understand how to boost soldiers’ morale
The Yale Model
Elements of Persuasion
The Communicator: who delivers the message and what are their successful attributes
The Content: emotions vs. reason; the impact of raising fear; primacy vs. recency
Reason vs. emotion: it depends on the audience
Primacy: the first message usually has the advantage
Recency: the last message wins when there’s a delay between the two messages and the decision comes right after the second one
The Channel of Communication
Personal influence beats media influence
Complex vs simple messages
The Audience to Who the Message Is Conveyed
Age, cognitive ability
attitudes are especially open to change in adolescence and early adulthood, then become more stable
this makes college students a KEY audience for public health messages
What Paths Lead to Persuasion?
Central Route
Peripheral Route
Central Route
occurs when interested people focus on the arguments and respond with favorable thoughts
Purpose: more durable, and more likely to influence behavior
Peripheral Route
occurs when people are influenced by incidental cues, such as a speaker’s attractiveness
focuses on cures that trigger automatic acceptance without much thinking
Purpose: superficial and temporary attitude change
Elements of Persuasion: (1) The Communicator
Who is delivering the message? The communicator
Credibility = expertise and trustworthiness (how believable a communicator seems, and Myers describes it as having these two parts)
Trust increases when the speaker:
argues against their own self interest, like a fast-food executive recommending less fast food
isn’t trying to persuade us, like a conversation we overhear
speaks fluently and confidently, since speaking quickly can make a speaker seem more credible
Trustworthiness: eye-contact
The Sleeper Effect: the sleeper effect describes what happens when a message from a low-credibility source becomes more persuasive over time
Health misinformation on social media. A student sees a claim from an account they know is unreliable and dismisses it. Weeks later, they find themselves thinking, “Didn’t I hear somewhere that…?” They remember the claim but not where it came from.
Aspects of Attractiveness and Likeability
Physical Attractiveness
Similarity
Elements of Persuasion: (2) The Content
What is being said in the message
Reason vs. Emotion
is a logical message more persuasive, or one that arouses emotion?
Effect of good feelings
Effects of arousing fear
When soliciting donations to fight world hunger, should the message rely on statistics or on a picture of a starving child in Africa?
It depends on the audience:
Well-educated, analytical people respond to rational appeals
Most audiences are uninvolved and are more likely to respond to an emotional message
When people’s initial attitudes are formed through emotional responses, they are more likely to respond to emotional messages (priming)
Elements of Persuasion: (3) The Channel of Communication
Personal vs. Media Influence
Main Point: personal influence usually beats media influence, especially on attitudes and behaviors that matter to people
mass media works best on unfamiliar or minor issues, such as which brand of pain reliever to buy, and works less well on issues people already care about
why personal contact works better:
it’s interactive: the persuader can answer objections and tailor the message
it brings social norms and accountability
it’s harder to tune out than an ad
Elements of Persuasion: (4) The Audience
How old are they?
Life Cycle Explanation: some attitudes change as people get older
Generational Explanation: attitudes do NOT change, and older people largely hold onto the attitudes they adopted when they were young
No other way to explain this one other than it will be EXTREMELY dependent on the content of the message, and you might not know until after you try to persuade someone/a group if their age plays a role
They key question is not just whether people hear a message, but whether they counterargue against it
Forewarned is forearmed
The warning gives people time to prepare counterarguments, but this only happens when the topic matters to them
Distraction disarms counterarguing
A mild distraction can make a message more persuasive because it blocks the listener from building counterarguments
Uninvolved audiences use peripheral cues
If it personally affects the audience, message is likely processed centrally
If it does not personally affect the audience, peripheral cues like attractiveness and likeability are more likely to influence them (processed through the peripheral route)
Can we resist persuasion?
depends
strengthening personal commitment
inoculation programs
if i can persuade first, and strengthen attitudes and beliefs, they will be less likely to change
our greatest defense against persuasion is how deeply we are anchored in our attitudes or beliefs
for better or for worse