1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Terms
Code of Hammurabi → eye for an eye mentality - based on social class →. Torturous punishments
Quasi Crim Law → Law that creates offences and penalties but isn't enacted under federal criminal law → provincial / territorial regulations (nor apart of traditional criminal code)
Regulatory offences → regular actives that have laws/rules → fishing, driving, gambling, drinking
Zombie laws → laws that remain in the criminal code but are no longer active
Necessity (common law defence ) → your life was at risk (all or nothing) → ex: plane crash and survivors start eating bodies bc they need food
Duress ( Common law defence) → being pressured to do smt illegal → ex: armed robbery @ bank bc man who kidnapped your kid told you to
Stare decisis → to stand by things decided → courts follow / respect decisions made by higher courts → R V J. A.
Rule of law → no one is above law
Historically dealing w crimes
Crime was a conflict between private citizens → dealt w through private prosecutions ( brought by private citizen not public official)
Code of Hammurabi → based on social class
Torturous punishments → ordeal (seeking an answer about accused guilt or innocence)
Laws are now a public offence against the state → Canadian crim law relies on Great Britain
1892: Canadian crim law codified w criminal code
Codified- written record
Common law / case law
Case law → judge made laws
Law developed by judges rather than legislative enactments.
Setting a precedent for what other judges must follow
If there is a question about how a case should be dealt W, it sometimes makes it to the Supreme Court
Necessity & Duress → common law defences
Case law example → R v J.A.

Criminal Law
Everything criminal falls under federal gov
Criminal offence = public evil (harms everyone)
To fall under federal crim law it must have
A prohibition (not allowed)
A penalty
Criminal purpose → public evil
Omissions
Sec 215 in cc
The failure to act
Not doing anything is an act - if legally required to act (ex: not feeding your baby )
Actus Reus
Act that has been done → guilty act, omissions, causation
3 parts:
Prohibited (Voluntary) conduct
that occurs in certain circumstances
resulting in harmful consequences
Mens rea
Guilty mind → was it intentional?
Subjective Mens rea:
What did the accused intend to do?
Intention
Knowledge → accused knew / aware of certain circumstances at time of offence
Recklessness → accused was aware of the risks but chose to proceed anyways
Wilful blindness → pretend you don't know the risks/problem
Mental states
objective:
criminally responsible for acting in a negligent way → not what a reasonable person would've done in the same circumstance
Components of AR and MR
conduct → what is the offence?
Circumstances → what happened?
decision → guilty?
Sometimes only act is needed → absolute & strict liability
Liability
Absolute → speeding, failure to stop at stop sign
Strict → failure to stop at the scene of an accident
Room for offender to explain why they did → accident could have been an emergency situation
Parties to an offence
Sec 21
Everyone is a party to a offence who:
actually commits it
Does or omits (fails to do smt) to do anything for the purpose of aiding any person to commit it
Encourages person in commiting it
Defences missing actus reus
automatism → brain not functioning properly - brain and body not connected:
Normal condition automatism → sleep walking, seizures
External blow → brain damage (concussion)
Involuntary intoxication → someone drugged you
Self induced intoxication → got yourself drunk
Mental disorder → mental health issues
* first three only ones that you would not be convicted
Mistake offence → mistake of law and mistake of fact
19yr slept w minor but she was in club so how would he of known
Consent → only be given when conscious
Defences missing men's rea
NCRMD → not criminally responsible due to mental disorder
Intoxication → can be used for defense in rare occasions
specific intent → murder, Break and enter
General intent → assault