EPD 2 M1: Ecological Foundations and the Urban Context

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/51

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Focal Question: What distinguishes a “built environment” from a functioning ecosystem, and why does that distinction matter for the architect?

Last updated 5:43 AM on 9/10/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

52 Terms

1
New cards

Ecosystem

interacting biotic and abiotic components and flows of energy and matter

2
New cards

Built Environment

human-dominated modification of biotic and abiotic relationships

3
New cards
4
New cards

Ecology

Architecture students often treat ___ as external to the building (false)

5
New cards

Building and its site

Systems thinking requires recognising the ___ as part of a modified urban ecosystem

6
New cards

Solar (in situ)

primary energy source of natural ecosystems

7
New cards

Mostly imported (fossil, grid)

primary energy source of built environments

8
New cards

Largely closed / cyclic

material cycles of natural ecosystems

9
New cards

Predominantly linear

material cycles of built environments

10
New cards

High, functionally diverse

biodiversity of natural ecosystems

11
New cards

Low, simplified, human-dominated

biodiversity of built environments

12
New cards

Infiltration, storage, slow release

hydrology of natural ecosystems

13
New cards

Rapid runoff, reduced reharge

hydrology of built environments

14
New cards

Local, relatively rapid

feedbacks of natural ecosystems

15
New cards

Often delayed, displaced, social

feedbacks of built environments

16
New cards

High within limits

self-organization of natural ecosystems

17
New cards

Dependent on continuous human input

self-organization of built environments

18
New cards

linearisation and simplification

Every design decision can intensify ___

19
New cards

circularity and resilience

Every design decision can work toward greater ___

20
New cards

urban design and land conversion

cumulative ecological modification in Philippine coastal and peri-urban landscapes arre driven by ___

21
New cards

Ecological footprint

quantifies the biologically productive area required to support consumption and absorb waste

22
New cards

global hectares

unit of ecological footprint

23
New cards

ecological deficit

demand exceeds domestic biocapacity

24
New cards

carbon, food, and materials

often dominate total footprint components

25
New cards

True

Density alone does not guarantee a smaller footprint

26
New cards

project-scale design choices

affects planetary regenerative capacity (based on footprint analysis)

27
New cards

Urban metabolism

analyzes the flows of energy, water, materials, and waste through urban systems

28
New cards

extract–use–dispose

linear model

29
New cards

linear model

Most cities still operate on a ___ model

30
New cards

circular metabolism

seeks to close loops and reduce virgin throughput

31
New cards

Buildings

nodes within larger metabolic networks

32
New cards

design decisions

aggregate into city-scale profiles

33
New cards

Metabolic thinking

connects project design to footprint reduction and natural capital conservation

34
New cards

Natural capital

stock of ecosystems and resources that generate flows of ecosystem services essential to human well-being

35
New cards

expendable

conventional development has often treated natural capital as ___

36
New cards

long-term resilience

conventional development results to depletion that undermines ___

37
New cards

National Adaptation Plan 2023–2050

frames ecosystems and biodiversity as central to climate adaptation and sustainable development

38
New cards

site selection, land conversion, and ecological performance

Architects and urban designers influence natural capital through ___ of projects.

39
New cards

Global assessments

established the scientific and policy foundations for ecosystem service and natural capital thinking

40
New cards

site analysis and design justification

key global frameworks supply a shared vocabulary and analytical structure for ___

41
New cards

integrated socio-ecological approaches and nature-based solutions

growing trend in urban contexts

42
New cards

Biocapacity

capacity of ecosystems to produce useful biological materials and absorb waste under current management; measured in global hectares

43
New cards

Circular metabolism

urban or industrial system designed to maximise recovery, reuse, and regeneration of materials and energy, minimising virgin extraction and residual waste

44
New cards

Ecological footprint (EF)

biologically productive area required to support a population’s consumption and absorb its waste; expressed in global hectares

45
New cards

Ecological overshoot

condition in which demand on ecosystems exceeds their regenerative capacity within a given period

46
New cards

Ecosystem

dynamic complex of plant, animal, and microorganism communities and the non-living environment interacting as a functional unit

47
New cards

Ecosystem services

benefits people obtain from ecosystems, commonly classified as provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural

48
New cards

Global hectare (gha)

A hectare of biologically productive land or water normalised to world-average productivity (unit)

49
New cards

Linear (throughput) metabolism

system that extracts resources, uses them, and discards residues as waste, with limited recovery or cycling

50
New cards

Natural capital

stock of natural assets that yield flows of ecosystem services to people

51
New cards

Urban metabolism

study of energy, water, material, and waste flows into, through, and out of urban systems

52
New cards

Modified ecosystem

An ecosystem in which human design and management have become dominant drivers of structure and function; the built environment is treated as such