EPD 2 M1: Ecology for Architects

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/139

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Handouts 1-3

Last updated 10:00 AM on 10/6/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

140 Terms

1
New cards

Ecosystem

interacting biotic and abiotic components and flows of energy and matter

2
New cards

Ecosystem

dynamic complex of living communities and non-living environment interacting as a functional unit

3
New cards

Built Environment

human-dominated modification of biotic and abiotic relationships and drivers of structure and function

4
New cards

cities

socio-ecological systems where biophysical & social processes co-evolve

5
New cards

Building and its site

must be recognized as part of a modified urban ecosystem

6
New cards

Solar (in situ)

primary energy source of natural ecosystems

7
New cards

Mostly imported (fossil, grid)

primary energy source of built environments

8
New cards

Largely closed / cyclic

material cycles of natural ecosystems

9
New cards

Predominantly linear

material cycles of built environments

10
New cards

High, functionally diverse

biodiversity of natural ecosystems

11
New cards

Low, simplified, human-dominated

biodiversity of built environments

12
New cards

Infiltration, storage, slow release

hydrology of natural ecosystems

13
New cards

Rapid runoff, reduced reharge

hydrology of built environments

14
New cards

Local, relatively rapid

feedbacks of natural ecosystems

15
New cards

Often delayed, displaced, social

feedbacks of built environments

16
New cards

High within limits

self-organization of natural ecosystems

17
New cards

Dependent on continuous human input

self-organization of built environments

18
New cards

peri-urban landscapes, urban green spaces, restored rivers, and green roofs

sit at intermediate points between natural systems and built systems

19
New cards

linearisation and simplification

Every design decision can intensify ___

20
New cards

circularity and resilience

Every design decision can work toward greater ___

21
New cards

urban design and land conversion

ecological modification in Philippine coastal and peri-urban landscapes arre driven by ___

22
New cards

Ecological footprint

quantifies the biologically productive area required to support consumption and absorb waste

23
New cards

global hectares

unit of ecological footprint

24
New cards

Biocapacity

capacity of ecosystems to produce materials and absorb waste

25
New cards

ecological overshoot

demand exceeds biocapacity

26
New cards

ecological deficit

demand exceeds domestic biocapacity

27
New cards

carbon, food, and materials

often dominate total footprint components

28
New cards

Built-up land footprint

footprint component especially relevant to architetcure; impermeable/developed surface

29
New cards

~1.3 gha

Philippine EF per person

30
New cards

~2.6-2.8 gha

World average EF per person

31
New cards

~0.4 gha

Philippine biocapacity per person

32
New cards

~1.5-1.6 gha

World average biocapacity per person

33
New cards

-230% deficit

Philippine percent of ecological balance

34
New cards

overshoot of 1.73 Earths

Global context of ecological balance

35
New cards

Density

does not guarantee a smaller footprint by itself

36
New cards

project-scale design choices

affects regenerative capacity at planetary-scale

37
New cards

Urban metabolism

analyzes the flows of energy, water, materials, and waste through urban systems

38
New cards

Buildings

nodes within larger metabolic networks

39
New cards

extract–use–dispose

linear metabolism model

40
New cards

linear

predominant metabolic system of most cities

41
New cards

circular metabolism

seeks to close loops and reduce virgin throughput

42
New cards

Metabolic thinking

connects project design to footprint reduction and natural capital conservation

43
New cards

Natural capital

stock of ecosystems and resources that generate flows of ecosystem services essential to human well-being

44
New cards

short-term economic gains vs. long-term ecosystem services loss

trade-offs from developmental decisions

45
New cards

expendable

conventional development has often treated natural capital as ___

46
New cards

National Adaptation Plan 2023–2050

frames ecosystems and biodiversity as central to climate adaptation and sustainable development

47
New cards

site selection, land conversion, and ecological performance

How architects and urban designers influence natural capital

48
New cards

Global assessments

established the scientific and policy foundations for ecosystem service and natural capital thinking

49
New cards

integrated socio-ecological approaches and nature-based solutions

growing trend in urban contexts

50
New cards

Costanza et al. (1997)

key global framework on global valuation of ES, ES constitute a major component of the economic system

51
New cards

33 trillion US dollars

estimated average annual value

52
New cards

Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005)

multi-stakeholder global assessment that systemized the 4-category ES typology

53
New cards

The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB, 2010)

focused on policy-oriented valuation guidance and economic values of biodiversity and ES

54
New cards

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

emphasizes transformative change and the interdependence of biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and human quality of life

55
New cards

Biocapacity

capacity of ecosystems to produce useful biological materials and absorb waste under current management; measured in global hectares

56
New cards

Circular metabolism

urban or industrial system designed to maximise recovery, reuse, and regeneration of materials and energy, minimising virgin extraction and residual waste

57
New cards

Ecological footprint (EF)

biologically productive area required to support a population’s consumption and absorb its waste; expressed in global hectares

58
New cards

Ecological overshoot

condition in which demand on ecosystems exceeds their regenerative capacity within a given period

59
New cards

Ecosystem

dynamic complex of plant, animal, and microorganism communities and the non-living environment interacting as a functional unit

60
New cards

Ecosystem services

benefits people obtain from ecosystems, commonly classified as provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural

61
New cards

Global hectare (gha)

A hectare of biologically productive land or water normalised to world-average productivity (unit)

62
New cards

Linear (throughput) metabolism

system that extracts resources, uses them, and discards residues as waste, with limited recovery or cycling

63
New cards

Natural capital

stock of natural assets that yield flows of ecosystem services to people

64
New cards

Urban metabolism

study of energy, water, material, and waste flows into, through, and out of urban systems

65
New cards

Modified ecosystem

An ecosystem in which human design and management have become dominant drivers of structure and function; the built environment is treated as such

66
New cards

forests, coastal/mangrove, freshwater/watershed, and urban green-space systems

Ecosystem categories relevant to design practice

67
New cards

interconnected

Ecosystem categories and their impacts are ___

68
New cards

Urban and residual systems

are ecosystems and not merely residual/decorative space

69
New cards

Categorization of ecosystems

guides which services, legal instruments, and design strategies are prioritized

70
New cards

in close proximity

The Philippine archipelagic and megadiverse context places multiple ecosystem types ___ to expanding urban areas

71
New cards

Ecosystem Approach

integrated strategy for managing land, water, and living resources that balances conservation, sustainable use, and equity

72
New cards

Ecosystem Approach

complements (rather than replaces) EIA, rating systems, and land-use tools

73
New cards

Ecosystem services

benefits people obtain from ecosystems

74
New cards

Ecosystem services

organised by the MA into provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural categories

75
New cards

supporting services

underpin other services; often the first to be overlooked in design analysis

76
New cards

direct and indirect drivers

shape service capacity

77
New cards

trade-offs

design must engage in ___ rather than assume all ecological processes are beneficial

78
New cards

Upland forest condition

directly influences downstream flood risk, baseflow, and sediment loads that affect urban areas

79
New cards

retaining canopy, soil, and connectivity

Site strategies in forest ecosystems that can moderate service loss even when some development occurs

80
New cards

1m sea-level rise

risk of future exposure of remaining mangroves (according to NAP 2023–2050)

81
New cards

setbacks, buffers, and nature-based elements

Site strategies in mangrove/waterfront ecosystems that can moderate service loss and retain protective function

82
New cards

watersheds

integrate water yield, sediment regulation, water quality, flood control, and habitat services across elevational gradients

83
New cards

Upland and riparian land cover

high-leverage determinants of downstream service levels

84
New cards

Philippine InVEST applications (Balanac)

quantify how land-cover scenarios alter water and sediment services

85
New cards

Site-scale impervious cover and vegetation removal

aggregate into catchment-scale hydrograph and sediment changes

86
New cards

maximise infiltration, retain buffers, and minimise connected imperviousness

Site strategies in watershed ecosystems that contribute to watershed service maintenance

87
New cards

~0.62 m²

Metro Manila’s per-capita provision

88
New cards

9 m²

WHO indicative standard per-capita provision

89
New cards

canopy, structure, soil, and connectivity

influences service magnitude of urban green spaces

90
New cards

Infilling, privatisation, and residual treatment

primary pressures of urban green spaces

91
New cards

equity

central concern of urban green spaces

92
New cards

Direct drivers

factors that unequivocally influence ecosystem processes

93
New cards

land-use change, over-exploitation, pollution, climate change, invasive species

direct drivers examples

94
New cards

Ecosystem Approach

strategy for the integrated management of land, water, and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way

95
New cards

Ecosystem disservices

harmful or unwanted functions/products (from a human perspective) generated by ecosystems

96
New cards

Indirect drivers

underlying factors that alter direct drivers

97
New cards

demographic, economic, socio-political cultural, technological, and governance factors

indirect drivers examples

98
New cards

Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST)

suite of models used to map and value ecosystem services under alternative scenarios

99
New cards

Provisioning services

products obtained from ecosystems (food, water, timber, fibre, genetic resources, etc.)

100
New cards

Regulating services

benefits obtained from the regulation of ecosystem processes (climate, flood, disease, water purification, etc.)