Business Ethics and Cognitive Errors Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/199

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A comprehensive collection of 200 vocabulary flashcards covering cognitive errors in ethical reasoning, the foundations and evolution of business ethics, human motivation, and the study of ethical leadership.

Last updated 11:16 PM on 10/13/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

200 Terms

1
New cards

Biases

Built-in mental tendencies to perceive and interpret situations in a slanted or prejudiced way.

2
New cards

Heuristics

Mental shortcuts, or rules of thumb, that enable people to make decisions quickly but can sometimes lead to systematic mistakes.

3
New cards

Fallacies

Errors in reasoning that occur when a conclusion does not logically follow from the argument or evidence offered in its defense.

4
New cards

Errors in Perception of Facts

Cognitive errors that distort how information is gathered, taken in, and interpreted based on presentation, source, or prior expectations.

5
New cards

Endowment Effect (Ownership Bias)

The tendency to value an item, project, or resource more simply because it belongs to us, demanding more to part with it than we would pay to acquire it.

6
New cards

Self-Serving Bias

The tendency to attribute personal successes to internal qualities like skill or hard work while blaming failures on external factors like bad luck or unfair conditions.

7
New cards

Context Dependence (Context Effect)

The principle that human perceptions, evaluations, and ethical judgments change depending on the surrounding environment or circumstances.

8
New cards

Halo Effect

A cognitive bias where an overall positive impression of a person or organization spills over into assumptions that they are competent in unrelated areas.

9
New cards

Horns Effect

The reverse of the halo effect, where a single perceived negative trait drags down the overall judgment of an individual across all other areas.

10
New cards

Hindsight Bias

The tendency to believe, after an event has already occurred, that the outcome was obvious, predictable, or known all along.

11
New cards

Classical Economics

An economic framework assuming that individuals are perfectly rational, self-interested agents who consistently make decisions that maximize expected value.

12
New cards

Expected Value

The mathematical average outcome obtained if a choice were repeated many times, calculated by weighting each possible outcome by its probability.

13
New cards

Behavioral Economics

A field integrating psychology with economics to study how humans actually make decisions given limited attention, emotions, and cognitive shortcuts.

14
New cards

Prospect Theory

A behavioral economic theory developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky demonstrating that people evaluate outcomes based on subjective value relative to a reference point.

15
New cards

Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky

The psychologists who developed Prospect Theory, demonstrating systematic human departures from expected value theory in decision-making.

16
New cards

Subjective Value (Expected Utility)

The perceived personal worth or emotional weight that an individual assigns to an outcome, distinct from its objective mathematical value.

17
New cards

Four Departures of Prospect Theory

The four core ways human decision-making departs from pure rationality: reference dependence, diminishing sensitivity, loss aversion, and probability weighting.

18
New cards

Reference Point

The baseline (typically the status quo or prior expectations) against which individuals evaluate potential outcomes as gains or losses.

19
New cards

Framing via Reference Points

The tactic of influencing decision-making by altering the baseline, such as presenting a corporate decision as saving 200200 jobs versus eliminating 100100 jobs.

20
New cards

Diminishing Sensitivity

The behavioral principle that a given increment of change has a diminishing psychological impact the further one moves from the initial reference point.

21
New cards

Loss Aversion

The cognitive phenomenon where the psychological pain of losing an amount is approximately twice as strong as the pleasure of gaining that exact same amount.

22
New cards

Probability Weighting

The tendency of decision-makers to evaluate risks based on how likely something subjectively feels rather than its actual statistical probability.

23
New cards

Overweighting Small Probabilities

The tendency to treat tiny statistical chances as larger and more impactful than they are, motivating behavior like lottery ticket purchases.

24
New cards

Underweighting Moderate-to-Large Probabilities

The tendency to treat high probabilities as less certain than they actually are, such as treating a 75%75\% failure risk as leaving substantial hope of success.

25
New cards

Conjunctive Event Bias

The tendency to overestimate the likelihood that a series of events will all succeed, overlooking the fact that compound probability decreases with each step.

26
New cards

Disjunctive Event Bias

The tendency to underestimate the probability that at least one of several independent risks or component failures will occur across an entire system.

27
New cards

Redundancy (Backup Systems)

The implementation of duplicate safety controls whose cost is justified by compensating for disjunctive risks across multiple components.

28
New cards

Availability Heuristic

The tendency to estimate the frequency or probability of an event based on how easily vivid, recent, dramatic, or emotional examples come to mind.

29
New cards

Representativeness Heuristic

Judging the probability of an outcome by how closely it resembles a typical mental prototype rather than relying on statistical frequency.

30
New cards

Conjunction Fallacy

The reasoning error of judging that two joint conditions together are more probable than either one of those individual conditions occurring alone.

31
New cards

The Linda Problem

A famous experiment where subjects erroneously judged that Linda being a bank teller and active feminist was more probable than Linda simply being a bank teller.

32
New cards

Anchoring Heuristic

The tendency to rely excessively on the first piece of information encountered when formulating numerical estimates of value, price, or probability.

33
New cards

Confirmation Bias

The habit of seeking out, favoring, and recalling evidence that corroborates preexisting beliefs while actively dismissing or overlooking contradictory facts.

34
New cards

Base Rate Fallacy (Base Rate Neglect)

The cognitive mistake of ignoring general statistical prevalence (the base rate) in favor of case-specific, vivid details when assessing likelihood.

35
New cards

Base Rate

The overall, baseline proportion or statistical frequency with which a condition, trait, or event occurs across an entire population.

36
New cards

Gambler's Fallacy (Maturity of Chances)

The false belief that independent past random occurrences alter future probabilities, assuming that chance must balance out in the short term.

37
New cards

Expectation Bias

The tendency for an observer's prior expectations to distort and color their interpretation of ambiguous information or employee performance.

38
New cards

Blind Reviews

An evaluation practice where names and personal identifiers are removed from documents to neutralize expectation bias and stereotypes.

39
New cards

Structured Rubrics

Pre-established, objective scoring criteria used to evaluate performance consistently before subjective biases can influence judgment.

40
New cards

Overconfidence

The tendency to overestimate one's actual knowledge, capability, predictive accuracy, and personal immunity to ethical lapse.

41
New cards

Causal Fallacies

Errors in reasoning regarding cause-and-effect relationships, such as assuming causation where only coincidence or correlation exists.

42
New cards

Assuming Correlation Between Factors

The error of asserting that two variables are meaningfully linked simply because they happened to be observed together in a small number of instances.

43
New cards

False Causal Attribution (Correlation ≠ Causation)

The mistake of concluding that a confirmed statistical correlation between two variables proves that one factor directly causes the other.

44
New cards

Confounding Variable

An unexamined third variable that is responsible for producing the observed statistical relationship between two correlated factors.

45
New cards

Reverse Causation

A causal error where the true direction of cause and effect is the exact opposite of what the decision-maker assumes.

46
New cards

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

A Latin causal fallacy ('after this, therefore because of this') assuming that because event B succeeded event A, event A must have caused event B.

47
New cards

Regression to the Mean

The statistical reality that extreme, unusual outcomes are naturally followed by results closer to the historical average, regardless of interventions.

48
New cards

Bad Reasons Fallacy

The mistaken assumption that a conclusion must be completely false simply because the supporting argument provided for it is weak or flawed.

49
New cards

Non-Sequitur

A Latin phrase meaning 'it does not follow,' describing an argument whose conclusion lacks a valid logical connection to its premise.

50
New cards

Irrelevant Conclusion Fallacy

A logical error where presented evidence successfully establishes a valid point, but not the specific conclusion being asserted by the speaker.

51
New cards

Fallacies of Relevance

Arguments that attempt to persuade by introducing extraneous information, emotions, or character attacks that distract from the core issue.

52
New cards

Ad Hominem Fallacy

A fallacy that attacks the speaker's personal background, character, or motives rather than addressing the actual merits of their argument.

53
New cards

Straw Person Fallacy

The practice of misrepresenting, oversimplifying, or exaggerating an opposing position to make it easier to attack and disprove.

54
New cards

Red Herring Fallacy

The tactic of introducing an entirely unrelated topic into a discussion to sidetrack the audience from the primary problem under review.

55
New cards

Appeal to Fear

The use of unsupported threats or alarming hypotheticals to bypass rational critical thinking and pressure people into agreement.

56
New cards

Bandwagon Fallacy (Appeal to Popularity)

The claim that a practice or belief must be correct or acceptable simply because it is popular or widely practiced across an industry.

57
New cards

Appeal to Tradition

Arguing that a course of action is justified or superior merely because an organization has historically always done things that way.

58
New cards

Appeal to Emotion

An attempt to secure agreement by manipulating emotional responses such as pity, pride, guilt, or loyalty in place of valid evidence.

59
New cards

Appeal to Authority

Arguing that an assertion must be true simply because a high-status individual asserted it, especially when they lack expertise in that specific subject.

60
New cards

Appeal from Authority

Dismissing a valid argument or accurate factual claim purely because the speaker lacks formal executive credentials, status, or organizational rank.

61
New cards

Sunk Cost Fallacy

The tendency to persist in an unprofitable or harmful venture because of past unrecoverable investments of money, time, or labor.

62
New cards

Fallacies of Presumption

Errors in reasoning that rest on unexamined, unstated, or unjustified background assumptions that undermine logical validity.

63
New cards

Division Fallacy

The false presumption that whatever is true of a whole system or organization must necessarily apply to each of its constituent parts.

64
New cards

Composition Fallacy

The false presumption that because individual components possess a certain trait, the larger whole they form must also possess that same trait.

65
New cards

False Alternative Fallacy (False Dilemma)

Artificially framing an ethical choice as an absolute either/or proposition between two extremes while ignoring other viable solutions.

66
New cards

Smart Thermostat Sunk Cost Fallacy

In the launch scenario, defending an overheating unit with 'We've come too far to stop now' after spending 1818 months and $2 million\$2\text{ million}.

67
New cards

Smart Thermostat Probability Error

Calling a 1 in 5001\text{ in }500 overheat rate a 'tiny risk,' ignoring that selling 100,000100{,}000 units would cause roughly 200200 dangerous malfunctions.

68
New cards

Smart Thermostat Division & Halo Error

Assuming an overheating product must be safe merely because the quality engineering team possesses an outstanding general reputation.

69
New cards

Smart Thermostat Bandwagon Error

Dismissing a severe safety hazard by arguing that 'Every competitor launches with a few bugs.'

70
New cards

Smart Thermostat False Dilemma & Fear Error

Coercing a launch approval by falsely claiming: 'Either we launch on schedule, or the company goes under.'

71
New cards

De-biasing the Endowment Effect

Checking ownership bias by asking: 'Would I value this project, budget, or resource the same way if it belonged to another team?'

72
New cards

De-biasing Self-Serving Bias

Checking defensive attributions by asking: 'If this situation had turned out the other way, what would I say caused it?'

73
New cards

De-biasing Hindsight Bias

Recording predictions, factual constraints, and reasoning in writing before project outcomes are known.

74
New cards

De-biasing Confirmation Bias

Actively seeking disconfirming facts by asking: 'What evidence would prove me wrong, and have I honestly searched for it?'

75
New cards

De-biasing Anchoring

Investigating where starting figures originated and consulting neutral, independent benchmarks before negotiating.

76
New cards

Ethics

The systematic study of morality—examining principles of right and wrong, good and bad, justice and injustice.

77
New cards

Ēthos

The ancient Greek word meaning character or custom, historically denoting the habits and dispositions that shape personal conduct.

78
New cards

Descriptive Ethics

The empirical branch of ethics focusing on what individuals, groups, and societies actually believe and practice regarding morality.

79
New cards

Normative Ethics

The philosophical branch of ethics establishing prescriptive moral standards regarding what individuals ought to do and why.

80
New cards

Business Ethics

The study of moral principles guiding commercial behavior, corporate strategy, and decision-making within economic markets.

81
New cards

Investopedia Business Ethics Definition

The moral principles guiding companies and individuals in commerce that extend beyond legal compliance to build market trust and integrity.

82
New cards

Harvard Business School Ethics Definition

The principles that direct organizational decisions, especially within ambiguous gray areas where proper action is not self-evident.

83
New cards

Internal Conduct in Business

The dimension of business ethics governing how a firm interacts with and treats its employees, managers, partners, and shareholders.

84
New cards

External Responsibilities in Business

The dimension of business ethics addressing how an enterprise impacts external stakeholders, consumers, communities, and ecosystems.

85
New cards

Integrity and Fairness Theme

A foundational business ethics principle requiring honesty and justice across commercial relations, marketing, and financial reporting.

86
New cards

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

A business practice balancing commercial profit generation with ecological sustainability and community social welfare.

87
New cards

Accountability and Transparency Theme

An ethical standard prioritizing open disclosure, public reliability, and clear responsibility in organizational governance.

88
New cards

Globalization and Cultural Relativism Theme

The challenge of navigating varying regional cultural expectations and local legal codes while preserving core ethical standards.

89
New cards

Separation Thesis

The contested view that commercial business conduct operates under norms completely distinct from personal ethical values.

90
New cards

Ancient Religious Commercial Codes

Moral traditions found in Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Confucianism prohibiting fraud, usury, and commercial exploitation.

91
New cards

Early 1900s Business Ethics Curriculum

The emergence of ethics in early U.S. business schools responding to rapid industrialization, labor exploitation, and monopolies.

92
New cards

1970s Business Ethics Movement

The period marked by widespread corporate adoption of formal ethical codes and compliance offices amid consumer and environmental movements.

93
New cards

1980s Business Ethics Institutionalization

The formal embedding of business ethics into standard American business curricula in response to major insider trading and fraud scandals.

94
New cards

Post-2008 Ethics Expansion

The renewed integration of ethics into leadership and risk management following systemic corporate failures and the 2008 financial crisis.

95
New cards

Stakeholder Capitalism

A corporate governance philosophy evaluating corporate success by value created for workers, consumers, and communities alongside shareholders.

96
New cards

Culture-Based Ethics vs. Compliance-Based Ethics

The insight that sustainable business integrity requires deeply embedded organizational values rather than bare legal rule compliance.

97
New cards

Honest Marketing and Advertising

A foundational ethical expectation in commerce prohibiting deceptive promotions, false product performance claims, and hidden charges.

98
New cards

Financial Responsibility

The moral duty to maintain transparent bookkeeping, accurate audit disclosures, anti-fraud controls, and full tax compliance.

99
New cards

Fair Labor Practices

The corporate duty to ensure safe working conditions, fair pay, reasonable work hours, and workplace freedom from harassment.

100
New cards

Moral Awareness (Ethical Sensitivity)

The learned cognitive ability to recognize that an organizational problem contains moral values, stakeholders, and potential harms.