1/64
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Inverse projection problem
Refers to the task of determining the object responsible for a particular image on the retina
Involves starting with the retinal image and then extending outward to the source of that image
(Why cant machines perceive like humans?)
Object can be hidden or blurred
People can often identify objects that are obscured and therefore incomplete, or in some cases objects that are blurry
(Why cant machines perceive like humans?)
Objects look different from different viewpoints
viewpoint invariance
(Why cant machines perceive like humans?)
Scenes contain high-level information
scenes are more complex
(why can't machines perceive like humans?)
Direct perception theories
- Bottom-up processing
- Perception comes from stimuli in the environment
- Parts are identified and put together, and then recognition occurs
Constructive perception theories
- Top-down processing
- People actively construct perceptions using information based on expectations
bottom-up processing
analysis that begins with the sensory receptors and works up to the brain's integration of sensory information
perceptual organization
the process by which elements in the environment become perceptually grouped to create our perception of objects
good continuation
connected points resulting in straight or smooth curves belong together
lines are seen as following the smoothest path
(Principles of perceptual organization)
Pragnanz
every stimulus is seen as simply as possible
(Principles of perceptual organization)
similarity
similar things are grouped together
(Principles of perceptual organization)
proximity
things that are near to each other are groupged together
(Principles of perceptual organization)
common fate
thing moving in the same direction are grouped together
(Principles of perceptual organization)
common region
elements in the same region tend to be grouped together
(Principles of perceptual organization)
uniform connectedness
connected region of visual properties are perceived as single unit
(Principles of perceptual organization)
figure-ground segregation
determining what part of environment is the figure so that it "stands out" from the background
Properties of figure and ground
The figure is more "thinglike" and more memorable than ground.
The figure is seen in front of the ground.
The ground is more uniform and extends behind figure.
The contour separating figure from ground belongs to the figure (border ownership).
Factors that determine which area is figure
- elements located in the lower part of displays
- convex side of borders
subjective factors that determine which area is figure
Gestalt psychologists believed that experience and meaning play a role in minor perceptual organization
Gobson experiment showed that figure-ground can be affected by the meaningfulness of a stimuli
A scene contains:
-background elements
-objects organized in meaningful ways with each other and the background
Difference between objects and scenes
- A scene is acted within
- An object is acted upon
Research on perceiving gists of scenes
- Potter showed that people can do this
when a picture is only presented for 1/4
second
- Fei-Fei used masking to show that the
overall gist is perceived first, followed by
details.
Global image features of scenes
-degree of naturalness
-degree of openness
-degree of roughness
-degree of expansion
-color
(holistic and perceived rapidly)
physical regularities
regularly occurring physical properties
oblique effect (physical regularities)
people perceive horizontals and verticals more easily than other orientations
uniform connectedness (physical regularities)
objects are defined by areas of the same color or texture
(physical regularities) Homogenous color and nearby objects...
have different colors
Light-from-above heuristic (physical regularities)
light in natural environment comes from above us
semantic regularities
characteristics associated with the functions carried out in different types of scenes
palmer experiment
- Observers saw a context scene flashed
briefly, followed by a target picture. - Results showed that:
• Targets congruent with the context were identified 80% of the time .
• Targets that were incongruent were only identified 40% of the time.
Scene schema
knowledge of what a given scene typically contains
perception
determined by specific organizing principles, not just dark and light stimuli activating the retina
experience can influence perception but is not the key driver
perceiving and grouping for sound
location
proximity in time
good continuation
similarity
theory of unconscious inference
The idea proposed by Helmholtz that some of our perceptions are the result of unconscious assumptions that we make about the environment.
explains why stimuli can be interpreted in more than one way
likelihood principle
objects are perceived based on what is most likely to have caused the pattern
- created by helmholtz
Bayesian inference
idea that estimation of the probability of an outcome is determined by prior probability and likelihood of a given outcome
top-down processing
information processing guided by higher-level mental processes, as when we construct perceptions drawing on our experience and expectations
Grill-Spector experiment
examined the role of the FFA in face recognition using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology. participants briefly saw Harrison Ford's face followed by a mask, or a control stimulus followed by a mask (a). In (b), we can see the activity in the FFA when the participant recognized the photo as Harrison Ford and when the participant did not. Note that the highest response in the FFA is for correct recognition.
Experiment by Shienberg & logothetis
Monkey was trained to pull two levers: one for a sunburst and one for a butterfly
Binocular rivalry was used - each picture shown to one eye at the same time
Neuron in the IT cortex that responded only to the butterfly was monitored
Firing was vigorous for only the butterfly
Experiment by Tong et al
Binocular rivalry used again with people
Picture of a house shown to one eye and a face to another
Participants pushed button to indicate perception.
fMRI showed an increase in activity in
Parahippocampal place area for the house
Fusiform face area for the face
Experiment by Kamitani & Tong
Gratings with different orientations were presented to participants.
Responses from fMRI voxels were measured.
Activity patterns across voxels varies by grating orientation.
An orientation decoder was used to analyze the voxel activity.
The decoder could accurately predict which orientation had been presented.
Structural Encoding
relatively shallow processing that emphasizes the physical structure of the stimulus
bottom-up processing
Semantic encoding
the encoding of meaning, including the meaning of words
Top-down processing
Visual scanning
looking from place to place
fixation (visual scanning)
orientation of the eyes so that they image of a viewed object falls on each fovea
saccadic eye movement (visual scanning)
visual fixation jump from one location to another in the visual field
overt attention
involved looking directly at the attended object
covert attention
attention without looking
stimulus salience
areas of stimuli that attract attention due to their properties
-ex: color, contrast, movement, and orientation are relevant properties
attentional capture
involuntary shift of attention due to stimulus salience
saliency maps
show fixations are related to such properties in the initial scanning process
Experiment by Shinoda et al
- Observers' fixations were measured during
computer simulated driving.
- They were more likely to detect stop signs
when they were at intersections.
- People have learned that this is where stop
signs are typically placed.
task demands
-task demands override stimulus saliency
-eye movements and fixations are closely linked to the action the person is about to take
-Dynamic environments (where things are constantly changing)
-expectations of a dynamic environment change what we attend to
What happens when we attend?
Attention to specific locations is called spatial attention
1. attention enhances our response to objects
2. attention enhances our perception to objects
3. attention enhances our physiological response
Experiment by Posner (1978) et al.
How attention enhances our response
Observers looked at a fixation point.
Precueing with an arrow indicated on which side a stimulus was likely to appear.
Stimuli appeared that were consistent (valid trial) or inconsistent (invalid trial) with the cue.
Task was to push button when a target square was seen.
Results showed that observers responded fastest on valid trials
Posner believed these results showed that information processing is most efficient where attention is directed
Experiment by Egly et al.
- Observer views two rectangles.
- Cue signals where target may appear.
- Task was to press button when target
appeared.
- Results show:
• Fastest reaction time at targeted position
• "Enhancement" effect for non-target
within the target rectangle
Experiment by Carrasco et al.
Observers saw two grating stimuli with either similar or different contrast between the bars.
Task was to fixate on center point between gratings and indicate orientation of bars with higher contrast.
Small dot was flashed very quickly on one side before gratings appeared.
Results showed that:
When there was a large difference in contrast, the dot had no effect
When contrast was the same, observers were more likely to report that grating preceded by the dot had higher contrast
This the shift of attention led to an effect on perception
O'Craven (1999)
subject attended to the house or face show that attending to the moving or stationary face caused enhanced activity in the FFA and attending to the moving or stationary house caused enhanced activity in the PPA
fMRI study
Participants used covert attention to focus on different areas
Attention to locations increases the response at specific areas in the brain
Datta and DeYoe (2009)
Attention maps show directing attention to a specific area of space activates a specific area of the brain.
Womelsdorf (2006)
Showed that attention can cause a monkey's receptive field to shift toward the place where the attention is directed
What happens when we don't attend?
inattentional blindness and change blindness
inattentional blindness
a stimulus is not perceived even when the person is looking directly at it
change blindness
Observers were shown a picture with and without a missing element in an alternating fashion with a blank screen
Results showed that the pictures had to alternate a number of times before the change was detected
When a cue is added to show where to attend, observers noticed change more quickly
Experiment by Simons and Charbis (1999)
Observers are shown short film teams passing a basketball
Task is to count number of passes
Either a woman with an umbrella or a person in a gorilla suit walks through the teams
46% of observers fail to report the woman or gorilla