Confounding and Obscuring Variables Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/28

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering internal validity threats, obscuring variables, null effects, statistical validity guidelines, and power based on lecture notes by Dr. Liz Shin.

Last updated 9:21 PM on 9/22/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

29 Terms

1
New cards

Construct Validity

The degree to which a study accurately measures and manipulates the operationalized variables under investigation.

2
New cards

External Validity

The extent to which the causal claims and findings of a study can be generalized to other people or situations.

3
New cards

Statistical Validity

The extent to which statistical conclusions drawn from a study are accurate and reliable, addressing effect size, estimate precision (such as a 95%95\% CI), and statistical power.

4
New cards

Internal Validity

The ability of a study to demonstrate that the independent variable, and not alternative explanations or confounds, caused the observed effect on the dependent variable.

5
New cards

Manipulation Check

An extra dependent variable inserted into an experiment to test whether the experimental manipulation worked as intended.

6
New cards

Pilot Study

A simple study completed before (or sometimes after) the primary study to test and refine procedures and manipulations.

7
New cards
<p>Cohen's Guidelines for Effect Size Strength</p>

Cohen's Guidelines for Effect Size Strength

Benchmarks for evaluating effect size strength where d=0.20d = 0.20 is small or weak (comparable to r=.10r = .10), d=0.50d = 0.50 is medium or moderate (comparable to r=.30r = .30), and d=0.80d = 0.80 is large or strong (comparable to r=.50r = .50).

8
New cards
<p>One-Group Pretest/Posttest Design</p>

One-Group Pretest/Posttest Design

A flawed research design in which a single group of participants is measured on a dependent variable before treatment, administered a treatment, and then measured again after treatment.

9
New cards

Maturation Threat

A threat to internal validity in which changes in participants occur naturally over time independent of the experimental treatment.

10
New cards

History Threat

A threat to internal validity occurring when external events take place during the study that influence participants' responses or behaviors.

11
New cards

Regression Threat

A statistical phenomenon in which extreme scores on a variable move closer to the group mean upon retesting.

12
New cards

Attrition Threat

A threat to internal validity caused by the systematic loss of participants from a study over time, biasing results if dropouts differ systematically from remaining participants.

13
New cards

Testing Threat

A threat to internal validity in which exposure to a pretest measure alters or influences participants' scores on the subsequent posttest measure.

14
New cards

Instrumentation Threat

A threat to internal validity occurring when a measuring instrument, observer, or coding standard changes over time during the study.

15
New cards

Observer Bias

A threat to internal validity occurring when researchers' expectations or beliefs unintentionally influence their observations or interpretation of the data.

16
New cards

Demand Characteristics

Cues in an experiment that lead participants to guess the study's hypotheses or expectations and alter their behavior accordingly.

17
New cards

Placebo Effect

An improvement in outcomes occurring solely because participants believe they are receiving an effective treatment, even when the treatment is inactive.

18
New cards

Double-Blind Study

An experimental procedure in which neither the participants nor the researchers observing them know who is in the treatment group or the control group.

19
New cards

Masked Study

An experimental procedure in which participants know their group assignment, but the observers or raters assessing them do not.

20
New cards

Null Effect

A finding that the independent variable did not produce a statistically significant difference on the dependent variable.

21
New cards

Weak Manipulation

An operationalization of the independent variable that lacks sufficient strength to produce a noticeable or measurable difference between experimental groups.

22
New cards

Insensitive Measure

A dependent variable measurement tool that cannot detect subtle or small differences between groups or conditions.

23
New cards
<p>Ceiling Effect</p>

Ceiling Effect

A restriction in score distribution occurring when a measured variable has an upper limit, causing scores to cluster at the high end of the scale.

24
New cards

Floor Effect

A restriction in score distribution occurring when a measured variable has a lower limit, causing scores to cluster at the low end of the scale.

25
New cards

Measurement Error

Any factor that inflates or deflates a participant's true score on a dependent variable, creating within-group variability.

26
New cards

Individual Differences

Variations in personal traits, characteristics, or behaviors across participants that spread out scores within an experimental group.

27
New cards

Situation Noise

External environmental distractions or factors that introduce within-group variability and obscure true differences between groups.

28
New cards
<p>Statistical Power</p>

Statistical Power

The probability that a study will yield a statistically significant result when the independent variable actually has a true effect.

29
New cards
<p>Publication Bias (File Drawer Problem)</p>

Publication Bias (File Drawer Problem)

The tendency for academic journals and researchers to publish studies with statistically significant results far more frequently than studies showing non-significant or null findings.