Criminal Law & Constitutional Protections: Key Concepts and Cases Flashcards | Quizlet

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/41

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:47 PM on 9/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

42 Terms

1
New cards
2
New cards
3
New cards
4
New cards
5
New cards

Commerce Clause Power

The constitutional authority granted to the federal government to pass criminal statutes, which is restricted to three limited categories of activity and requires that the activity substantially affect interstate commerce.

6
New cards

United States v. Lopez

A landmark decision in which the Supreme Court held that Congress exceeded its authority by attempting to regulate the possession of firearms within 1,000 feet of school grounds, as the activity did not sufficiently affect interstate commerce.

7
New cards

Wickard v. Filburn

A ruling in which the Supreme Court upheld the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, determining that a farmer's home consumption of wheat, when viewed cumulatively, would profoundly affect interstate commerce.

8
New cards

Ex Post Facto Laws

Retroactive laws that are constitutionally prohibited because they punish individuals without prior notice that their actions were illegal; violated if adopted after the act and increasing crime severity or punishment.

9
New cards

Bill of Attainder

A legislative act that inflicts punishment on a specific individual or an easily identifiable group without the benefit of a judicial trial, such as a law barring Communist party members from serving as union officers.

10
New cards

First Amendment Protections

The explicit constitutional provisions that safeguard the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press.

11
New cards

Strict Scrutiny

The highest level of judicial review applied to content-based regulations; requires rigorous examination, though regulations are not always unconstitutional if they conflict with a fundamental liberty.

12
New cards

Incitement

A category of unprotected speech intended to provoke immediate lawless action.

13
New cards

Fighting Words

A category of unprotected speech defined as derogatory words that inflict injury or disrupt the peace.

14
New cards

Hate Speech

Derogatory racial words that are restricted only insofar as they qualify as fighting words.

15
New cards

Defamation

A false statement of fact published to third parties that results in injury to a person's reputation.

16
New cards

Obscenity

Materials or speech that meet legal criteria for being offensive and lacking value, falling outside First Amendment protection.

17
New cards

Miller 3-Prong Test

The judicial standard utilized to determine whether speech or material qualifies as unprotected obscenity.

18
New cards

Content-Neutral Regulation

A regulation that restricts the form or location of speech rather than the message itself, such as a rule stating, 'No billboards on Route 202.'

19
New cards

Content-Based Regulation

A regulation that restricts speech based on the specific message or viewpoint expressed, such as a rule stating, 'No Republican candidate billboards on Route 202.'

20
New cards

Unconstitutional Per Se

A legal challenge to a law that, by its very nature, encroaches on a constitutionally protected liberty or exceeds the government's constitutional powers.

21
New cards

Unconstitutional As Applied

A legal challenge where a law is considered valid on its face but is enforced in a manner that impermissibly restricts or punishes the exercise of a constitutional right.

22
New cards

Overbreadth

A constitutional defect occurring when a law is drafted so broadly that it interferes with fundamental rights and risks punishing conduct that should be protected.

23
New cards

Vagueness

A constitutional challenge to a law that is so unclearly defined that a person of common intelligence cannot determine if their conduct is prohibited, such as a law banning a 'destructive device' without a specific definition.

24
New cards

Rule of Law

The foundational principle that an individual cannot be held guilty of a crime unless they have committed a specific offense against a law that provides a clear penalty.

25
New cards

Substantive Law

The branch of law that defines specific crimes and establishes the parameters for penalties, such as a statute making the possession of heroin a crime.

26
New cards

Procedural Law

The rules and processes that regulate the enforcement of substantive laws, including the determination of guilt and the administration of punishment.

27
New cards

Actus Reus

The wrongful act specifically prohibited by criminal law, including voluntary physical acts or omissions where a legal duty exists, excluding mere thought.

28
New cards

Mens Rea

The element of criminal intent required for the commission of most crimes.

29
New cards

Motive

The underlying reason or drive that leads an individual to commit a criminal act.

30
New cards

Strict Liability

A category of offenses that do not require mens rea or criminal intent to establish guilt, such as statutory rape and the sale of liquor to a minor.

31
New cards

Mala In Se

Crimes that are considered inherently wrong or evil by their very nature and have been condemned since ancient times, such as murder, rape, and robbery.

32
New cards

Mala Prohibita

Offenses that are not inherently evil but are considered wrong only because the law declares them to be prohibited.

33
New cards

3rd Degree Felony (Pennsylvania)

A crime classification under Pennsylvania legislative classifications carrying a maximum punishment of not more than 7 years.

34
New cards

1st Degree Misdemeanor (Pennsylvania)

A crime classification under Pennsylvania legislative classifications carrying a maximum punishment of not more than 5 years.

35
New cards

English Common Law

The 11th-century legal system that serves as the earliest source of criminal laws.

36
New cards

Stare Decisis

The common law doctrine that requires courts to adhere to established legal precedents from previous cases.

37
New cards

Judicial Review

The power of the judiciary to invalidate substantive or procedural laws that are found to be in conflict with the Constitution.

38
New cards

Circuit Courts

The thirteen federal appellate courts that occupy the intermediate level of the federal judiciary.

39
New cards

Court of Common Pleas

The trial court level within the Pennsylvania judicial system where criminal trials are conducted.

40
New cards

Double Jeopardy

A constitutional protection preventing an individual from being tried twice for the same criminal offense; civil suits for the same incident do not violate this.

41
New cards

Burden of Proof

The obligation of the prosecution to prove every element of a crime to secure a conviction.

42
New cards

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The specific evidentiary standard to which the prosecution must prove every element of a crime in a criminal proceeding.