1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
IR(ME)R - practitioner vs operator
practitioner - justifies the exam - benefits outweigh the radiation risk
operator - carries out exam
radiographers always operators but not always practitioners
who is responsible for justification and what are the referral formats
practitioner
only requests in the UK, no ‘orders’
incomplete / inappropriate referrals can be and should be rejected
paper, digital or both but many are digital - paper often from external referrers - depends on trust
patient details required on a referral
full name, dob, address, nhs number and hospital number
identification of the patient
gender and pregnancy status - NOT required
hospital number is specific to every hospital
referrer details
name
consultant or gp
signature and specialism
no signature = no image
non medical referrers and who can refer for ionising radiation
advanced practise nurse and AHPs can but only within a set scope of practice narrower than medical staff
local policy dependent - all doctors can refer and dentists for dental imaging but PA’s don’t
what’s different about patients with neutropenia
some patients such as neutropenic patients are more prone to infection
many on chemotherapy who have neutropenia
infections = harder to treat
matters for infection control
unjustified requests
imaging that can’t change care
rib fractures without shortness of breath
unspecific low back pain unless history of prostate cancer - treatment: exercise
coccyx injury, nasal bone injury and undisplaced fractures of toes 2-5
soft tissue lumps with the exception of breast lumps
radiolucent foreign bodies such as fish bones unless in the top middle part of throat
CT with contrast (eGFR) and MRI - dangers / risks - why do CT and MRI referrals need extra information?
CT - contrast dye is cleared from the body by the kidneys and if kidneys aren’t working well, the dye can harm
referral needs an eGFR (blood test showing how well kidneys work) from a recent time - without = can’t safely give the dye
MRI - scanner is a very strong magnet so metal in body can be dangerous
previous procedures and implants = some can be moved, heated or damaged by the magnet
possible shrapnel = e.g someone working with grinding metal can have tiny pieces in the eye where the magnet can pull on them and cause blinding
ceramic and titanium = generally fine - orthopaedic implants - still to be checked
additional patient info?
patient referral location eg ward, clinic or gp
allergies
additional needs
patient mobility
oxygen requirements
infection status
special status eg private patient
referral clinical info
referrers must identify the modality and exam required
should be a clinical question of how imaging may change management