Week 2: Sustainability

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/31

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 10:31 AM on 9/22/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

32 Terms

1
New cards

Sustainable development

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising future generations' ability to meet their own needs (Brundtland Report, 1987).

2
New cards

Triple bottom line (TBL)

Measuring business performance across three "Ps" together: Profit, People, and Planet — not financial results alone.

3
New cards

Social capital

Value embodied in people: knowledge, skills, health, values, plus the shared culture and trust built inside groups.

4
New cards

Environmental capital

The stock of renewable and non-renewable natural resources and the services nature provides.

5
New cards

Economic capital

Tangible and intangible business assets that can be expressed in money terms (machines, brand value, cash flow).

6
New cards

Elkington's rule for using the TBL

A valid TBL claim requires progress on at least two of the three pillars (profit/people/planet), while the third stays unaffected — not sacrificed.

7
New cards

Strong sustainability

View that different types of capital (natural, social, economic) cannot fully replace each other — some natural resources must be protected no matter what.

8
New cards

Weak sustainability

View that different types of capital can substitute for each other — using up nature is fine if it's compensated with enough man-made capital.

9
New cards

Sustainability characteristics (Hahn, 2022)

Sustainability is: 1) multifaceted (many dimensions) 2) systemic (parts affect the whole) 3) complex and non-linear (small causes can have big, unpredictable effects).

10
New cards

Sustainability definitions — 3 dimensions (Lankoski)

1) Scope: broad (environment+social+economic) vs narrow (environment only) 2) Substitutability: strong vs weak 3) Goal orientation: absolute vs relative performance.

11
New cards

The Grand Acceleration

A dramatic post-1950s surge in human activity and resource use across almost every economic and environmental indicator at once.

12
New cards

Quadruple squeeze

Four converging pressures on sustainable development: Human growth, Ecosystems (biodiversity loss), Climate, and Surprise (unpredictable shocks). (Rockström & Karlberg, 2010)

13
New cards

Planetary boundaries framework

9 Earth-system processes (e.g. climate change, biosphere integrity, freshwater use, ocean acidification) whose combined limits define a "safe operating space" for humanity.

14
New cards

Planetary boundaries — 2025 finding

A 2025 study found 60% of the world's land area now lies outside the safe operating zone for biosphere integrity, with 38% in the high-risk category.

15
New cards

Modern slavery (stat)

In 2016, an estimated 35.8 million people worldwide were in modern slavery; the average global price of a slave was around $90.

16
New cards

Quintuple P framework

An expanded version of the triple bottom line: People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace, and Partnering.

17
New cards

Circular economy

An economic system designed to eliminate waste by keeping resources in use as long as possible, instead of the old "take-make-dispose" model.

18
New cards

EU circularity (stats)

In the EU, 14.1 tonnes of raw material are used per person per year, only 12.2% from recycled sources; the 2030 target is 24% circular material use (the Netherlands already leads at 32.7%).

19
New cards

Narrowing loops

Circular design strategy: using fewer resources per product (higher resource efficiency).

20
New cards

Slowing loops

Circular design strategy: extending or intensifying how long a product stays in use before disposal.

21
New cards

Closing loops

Circular design strategy: recycling materials so they flow from post-use back into new production.

22
New cards

Jevons Paradox (rebound effect)

When a more resource-efficient technology leads to so much extra consumption that it cancels out the expected environmental savings.

23
New cards

System-level innovation needs

For a circular economy to beat business-as-usual, it needs supportive policy: 1) legislation & regulation 2) market incentives 3) financing 4) knowledge & innovation 5) international cooperation.

24
New cards

Life-cycle assessment (LCA)

A method for measuring a product's environmental, social, and economic impact across its whole life, from raw material to disposal.

25
New cards

LCA — the 4 stages

1) Goal & scope: define why and what's included 2) Inventory: collect and calculate inputs/outputs 3) Impact assessment: judge real-world significance 4) Interpretation: turn results into action.

26
New cards

Ecological footprint & biocapacity

Ecological footprint = the biologically productive land/sea needed to meet demand. Biocapacity = the amount actually available to regenerate what's used. Goal: footprint ≤ biocapacity.

27
New cards

Earth Overshoot Day

The date each year when humanity has used up all the resources Earth can regenerate that year — currently using nature about 73% faster than it regenerates (1.73 Earths).

28
New cards

Organisational/sustainability paradox

A persistent contradiction between two things that are both necessary and connected, but seem to conflict (e.g. profit vs people/planet).

29
New cards

Either/or vs both/and thinking

Either/or forces a choice between profit OR sustainability. Both/and looks for ways to achieve profit AND sustainability together.

30
New cards

Managing paradoxes — 3 strategies

1) Acceptance: hold both sides in tension and live with it 2) Synthesis: find a new approach that satisfies both sides at once 3) Separation: address each side at a different time or place.

31
New cards

Coca-Cola case — problematic responses

Ambivalence (launch healthier options while still defending the old ones), Avoidance/denial (blame consumer choice), Reframing (redefine the issue, e.g. "it's about an active lifestyle," not sugar).

32
New cards

Coca-Cola case — better responses

Accept (openly acknowledge the contradiction, e.g. shift investment to zero-sugar), Separation (create a dedicated health-focused R&D unit), Synthesis (reposition around health leadership, working with regulators).