1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
models of legal education
2 models
postgraduate legal studies after undergrad degree(US)
undergrade degree + apprentice ship (more common)
shaped by colonization and geography- adapted to fit political, social, and economic environments
UK legal education
3 year bachelor of law degree followed by one year course determined by type of lawyer , solicitor, barrister- very rigid
increases accessibility, cheaper, easier to get a law degree (incentive)
practical implications- grad degree is extra barrier
practical implications
undergrad degree= more lawyers
more lawyers= more to go to to get representation
lawyers growing more essential
postgrad degree = extra barriers
obstacles to legal access
lack of resources
too little lawyers for too big population
physical location barriers
absence of knowledge in legal literacy
finances
predisposed perceptions of fear and mistrust (corrupted system)
inability to obtain a lawyer who can translate legal terminology and navigate system
legal profession issues
lawyers highly concentrated in western countries
highly concentrated in urban areas
typically very expensive
abcense of lawyers or inability to pay for them
legal mobilization
process requiring sustained litigation and resources typically beyond the reach of a single litigant to try to change the law
offers. non violent potentially sustainable avenue to achieve social change- since legal literacy is absent in most of the world
'“rights discourse” can become useful in countries where legal mobilization is blocked
provides option for when citizens are not heard by other government institutions
when can legal mobilization achieve policy change - EPPS
in additional to constitutional guarantees, and judicial independence and receptiveness- resources for sustained litigation
URRIBARRI: when can legal mobilization achieve policy change
counter to Epps
ran a study and found that judicial ideology and institutions determined success of rights litigation- NOT mobilization
institutions in different contexts produce different results
one-shooters
litigants involved in a single case- regular people
repeat players
regular participants in judicial proceedings- have experience, expertise and a longterm strategy- think corporations and regulation agencies