BY103 Environmental Science Midterm Review: Predators, Prey, and Biodiversity

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary practice flashcards covering keystone predators, competitive exclusion, trophic cascades, intertidal field studies, and the Yellowstone wolf reintroduction for the BY103 Environmental Science midterm review.

17 Terms

1
New cards

Keystone Predator

A top predator that keeps the dominant competitor in check, preventing it from monopolizing resources and thereby preserving the diversity of other species in the ecosystem.

2
New cards

Dominant Competitor

A species—such as mussels on a rocky shore or elk in Yellowstone—that expands to take over available space or food resources when freed from top-predator control.

3
New cards

Fast Loss

The rapid drop in community biodiversity (e.g., losing 22 species per year in the reef simulation) that happens when a top predator is removed and the dominant competitor rapidly displaces other species.

4
New cards

Slow Recovery

The gradual pace at which biodiversity rebuilds (e.g., regaining only 11 species per year in the reef model) following predator reintroduction, constrained by the need for space to be cleared and new species to arrive from nearby.

5
New cards

Robert Paine's Sea Star Experiment

A real-world intertidal study where removing the predatory sea star Pisaster caused rocky shore diversity to collapse from 1717 species to approximately 22 species as mussels took over, while control areas maintained 1616 to 2020 species.

6
New cards

Pisaster

The genus of predatory sea star studied by Robert Paine on rocky shores that acts as a keystone predator by consuming mussels to open space for other marine organisms.

7
New cards

Sea Star Wasting Disease

A disease event in 20132013 that killed massive numbers of sunflower sea stars in Northern California, triggering an approximately 60-fold60\text{-fold} increase in purple urchins (20142014 to 20152015) and the loss of over 90%+90\%+ of bull kelp across 217 miles217\text{ miles} of coastline.

8
New cards

Indirect Effect

An ecological relationship where one species influences another across multiple trophic levels without directly consuming it, such as sharks reducing sea lion populations, which in turn permits fish numbers to increase.

9
New cards

Control Group

A baseline comparison group in an experiment that is unmanipulated, such as Run 11 (no sharks) in the food chain tray model or Paine's undisturbed rocky shore plots where sea stars remained.

10
New cards

Predator-Prey Lag

The cyclical delay between prey population changes and predator population responses; in Run 11, prey (fish) peaked at Year 66 with 88 individuals, while predators (sea lions) peaked 2 years2\text{ years} later at Year 88 with 44 individuals.

11
New cards

The Reef Show Setup

A 16-square16\text{-square} model of a rocky shoreline initialized with 66 mussels, 88 different animal species, and 22 empty squares, totaling 99 kinds of organisms (with all mussels counted collectively as 11 kind).

12
New cards

Fates Swap (Act 2)

The mid-simulation reversal between Year 55 and Year 66 where disease eliminated sea stars from Board A (causing species to drop from 1313 to 33 by Year 1010) and sea stars returned to Board B (causing species to climb from 11 to 66 by Year 1010), with the lines crossing at Year 99 at 55 kinds each.

13
New cards

Simultaneous Updating Rule

The modeling rule requiring all population counts for a given year to be calculated solely from the prior year's numbers, preventing newly calculated values from influencing other species within the same turn.

14
New cards

Population Limits (Ocean Model)

The boundary constraints set in the food chain simulation preventing numbers from moving beyond fixed values: fish are restricted to 22 through 1212, sea lions to 11 through 55, and sharks to 11 through 44.

15
New cards

Yellowstone Wolf Reintroduction

The release of 3131 wolves into Yellowstone in 19951995 and 19961996 (∼70 years\sim 70\text{ years} after extirpation), correlating with northern elk herd drops from 17,00017{,}000 to 3,9153{,}915 (by 20132013), young aspen browsing decreasing from 100%100\% to under 20%20\%, and beaver colonies expanding from 11 to 1212.

16
New cards

Confounding Factors (Yellowstone)

External variables present in the Yellowstone ecosystem—including human hunting, predation by bears and cougars, and drought—that complicate attributing vegetation and elk changes exclusively to wolves due to the lack of a wolf-free control area.

17
New cards

2024 Colorado State Study

A study reporting that willows in Yellowstone remained short in plots lacking fences or beaver dams, indicating that certain claims regarding full ecological recovery driven entirely by wolf restoration were exaggerated.