1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Prejudice
a preconceived, negative judgment of a group and its individual members
ABCs
Affect - feelings (dislike, fear, disgust)
Behavior tendency - inclination to act (discrimination is a behavior associated with prejudice)
Cognitions - beliefs (stereotypes)
i.e. a prejudiced person may feel negative feelings towards a group, act in a discriminatory manner, believing that there are reasons to view them negatively
Cluster Group research - Bergh (2022)
marginalized people (Black, Asian, homeless, immigrants, Muslims, people in poverty)
unconventional groups (gays, lesbians, transgender, people, atheists, and liberals)
privileged or conservative groups (Christians, conservatives, athletes, White people, wealthy people)
Stereotypes
negative evaluations that mark prejudice often supported by social beliefs about groups of people
Explicit Prejudice
conscious, deliberate, and controllable
measured by self-report surveys
has declined sharply on many measures since the mid-20th century
shaped by social norms - people will likely conceal prejudiced views because there is less social approval for expressing them
may change with education
Implicit Prejudice
automatic, often unintentional associations
measured by reaction-time tasks such as the IAT
can coexist with sincere egalitarian beliefs
people can hold “dual attitudes” toward the same target (Wilson et al., 2000) - would not really create cognitive dissonance
may linger, changing only when we form new habits through practice
IAT: Implicit Association Test
When you see a hammer, what do you associate it with? Looking at WHAT the reaction is and the time it took to get here
How do inequality, socialization, institutions and our own needs feed prejudice?
social inequality and status
socialization: personality, religion, conformity
institutional supports
frustration and scapegoating
social identity and ingroup bias
motivation to avoid prejudice
The Three Roots of Prejudice
(1) Social Sources
unequal status, socialization and institutions that teach and maintain prejudice
(2) Motivation Sources
frustration, the need to belong and the need to feel good about ourselves and our groups
(3) Cognitive Sources
How normal thinking, categorizing, noticing, explaining, creates and sustains stereotypes that can lead to prejudice
Factors of Socialization that Influence Prejudice:
Ethnocentrism
Believing in the superiority of one’s own ethnic and cultural group, with corresponding disdain for outgroups
Authoritarian personality
Adorno (1950): intolerance of weakness, punitiveness and submission to ingroup authority predicted prejudice toward many groups
Social dominance orientation
a preference for group hierarchy. people high in SDO favor policies that keep their group on top
Extrinsic religiosity
religion as a means to an end - status, belonging, security
Intrinsic religiosity
faith as an end in itself is deeply internalized, associated with lower prejudice and GREATER TOLERANCE, highly committed members are often less prejudiced than nominal ones
Institutional Supports
media: portrayals that repeatedly link groups with crime, terrorism, or narrow roles reinforce stereotypes
Segregation
Policies and practices
criteria with unequal impact
Motivational Sources of Prejudice
Frustration and Scapegoating
Social Identity Theory
Motivation to Avoid Prejudice
Frustration and Scapegoating
Hovland & Sears (1940) - realistic group conflict theory adds that competition for scarce resources breeds prejudice
not about the PHYSICAL DIFFERENCES, but the PRESENCE OF RESOURCE SCARCITY
Social Identity Theory
Tajfel & Turner (1979): art of who we are comes from our groups.
ingroup bias - favoring our own group - follows, especially when personal or group esteem is threatened
mere categorization is enough to produce ingroup favoritism
bias does not require hostility, history, or competition - just us and them
Motivation to Avoid Prejudice
Devine (1989): nearly everyone knows the cultural stereotypes. what differs is whether we act on them
in order to really not be prejudiced, we all have to engage in controlled response… system 1 and system 2 again
Spontaneous categorizing
we automatically classify people by race, gender, and age. it saves mental effort, but it invites stereotyping (does not always create prejudice, sometimes we like what is different)
Outgroup homogeneity
“they” seem alike; “we” seem diverse
we perceive outgroup members as more similar to one another than ingroup members
a foundation for negative stereotyping
Group-Serving Bias
also called “the ultimate attribution error”
an outgroup’s bad acts —> that’s their character
an outgroup’s good acts —> luck, effort, or an exception to the general outgroup rule
the ingroup gets the opposite, flattering explanations, justifications for bad behavior, “they’re only trying to do what is right”
prejudice inherently shifts us to one side through the group-serving bias
Just-World Phenomenon
the belief that people get what they deserve
we don’t challenge prejudice, because we look at prejudice as justice in the world for people getting what they deserve
encourages blaming victims of poverty, assault, or discrimination
Cooperation and Superordinate Goals
shared goals that neither group can achieve along recast “them” as a part of “us”
most social psychologists and political psychologists agree that this is the best way to improve division in the United States political system
Recategorization
builds a common ingroup identity so former outgroup members become “us”
aligns with cooperation and superordinate goals
Deep Canvassing
10-minute conversations encouraging perspective-taking reduced anti-transgender prejudice for months
effort to communicate with those who hold prejudice
Habit Breaking
treating bias as a habit
Perspective-taking
imagining the world from another’s viewpoint increases empathy and reduces stereotyping