1/13
fmRI, post-mortems, EEG and EPS
Post mortem AO1
Used to examine brain to look for abnormalities not found control groups, may study person who showed interesting beh when alive which could indicate brain damage
Happens on deceased brain
E.g. Broca studied Tan - speech problems when alive - lesion in frontal lobe ‘brocas area’ on post-mortem
Most common technique is histology - brain removed from skull, cut into thin slices + studied under microscope
Stained purple so easier to see cell fibres under microscope
Post mortem AO3 useful tool
P: allows researchers to study brains structure at deeper microscopic level inc neuron’s + synapses which cannot be observed with non-invasive techniques eg fMRI
E: examine deeper brain regions eg hypothalamus - structural abnormalities eg enlarged ventricles - linked to schizophrenia - advanced biological basis of mental disorder
L: crucial insights which improve medical knowledge + generate hypotheses for further experiments - contributing to better diagnosis + treatment
H: depends on brain donations - could wait many years for suitable samples - slow scientific progress - ethical issues around consent for cognitively impaired
Post mortem AO3 confounding influences
P: different influences could affect brain structure, hard to establish cause + effect
E: many ind had LT treatment - affect brain structure/chemistry - difficult to determine whether abnormalities in brain due to disorder or effects of treatment - complicates interpretations
L: difficult to accurately draw conclusions from studying, limits usefulness
F: ind may die under very different circumstances, diff extent of disease, length of time between death + examination, age of death — difficult to compare abnormalities with controls to find difference - also generalisability
Further unelaborated post mortem evaluation points
No opportunity to follow up on findings to see ongoing cognitive/behavioural changes - lack experimental control
Difficult to assess whether brain abnormalities caused symptoms or were caused by them eg neurodegeneration
Better when converged with other methods: behavioural studies, fMRI, essential for confirming biological theories
Not helpful to patient but might bring peace to family
FMRI AO1
Measures changes in brain activity while Ind performs task eg cognitive (eyesight)
Neurons most active require increased energy - need oxygen + glucose in blood - when brain region is active = blood flow increases
Changes in blood flow measured using radio waves and magnetic fields
Areas with high levels oxygenated blood shown red - lower levels cooler colours
Two brain scans needed - 1 before task as baseline to measure activity associated with task
fMRI AO3 non-invasive
P: non-invasive - safer + more accessible - no physical intrusion or exposure to harmful substances
E: better than PET scans which require injection of radioactive tracers that carry potential health risks - it can be administered safely + repeatedly without harmful side effects
L: strength as encourages ease + access of use, which allows scientific research to become less limited, allows progression over time to be tracked - repeated use (unlike PM)
H: focuses solely on localised brain activity - overlooks networked nature of brain + integration between brain areas - leads to incomplete understanding of brain processes
FMRI AO3 objective
P: highly objective + reliable method - scientific data
E: Shegrill used fMRI to identify brain areas active in schizophrenic patients auditory hallucinations, very high spatial resolution
L: more scientific + objective - enhances understanding of underlying brain processes linked to mental disorders - legitimise - informs biological treatments
H: research in field is limited by economic implications: £230 per scan
Further AO3 fMRI points
Highly standardised - increases replicability adding credibility to findings
Allows researchers to observe mental processes that are difficult to verbalise
Low temporal resolution - does not measure neural firing + lags
Useful to link brain activity to task performance
EEG AO1
Measures electrical activity in the brain
Electrodes placed on the scalp - detect small electrical charges from activity of brain cells
Used to diagnose Alzheimer’s, epilepsy and sleep disorders
Measures amplitude & frequency of brain waves - synchronisation (regular pattern) or desynchronisation (irregular)
Epilepsy shows spikes of electrical activity
Normal activities at same time
EEG AO3 non-invasive
P; non-invasive
E: can perform activity at same time, comfortable, silent - can be used for infants, elderly, neurologically impaired
L: more inclusive + ethically appropriate - allows it to be used by everyone even those limited
H: electrical activity picked up by neighbouring electrodes - not useful to pinpoint exact source of neural activity - cannot distinguish between different, adjacent areas - less accurate + reliable than fMRI
EEG AO3 - temporal resolution
P: high temporal resolution - real time recording of brain activity unlike FMRI
E: track exact timing of neural events - shows how quickly the brain responds to stimuli or does cognitive processes
L: accurate measurement of brain activity in real time - which helps to understanding fast changing responses
F: used to diagnose + monitor epilepsy - real world value
ERPS AO1
Electrodes placed on scalop
Stimulus presented to p + researcher looks for brain activity related to
Hundreds of readings taken + average response graphed - makes specific response to the stimulus stand out
ERPS AO3 high temporal resolution
Tracks brain activity to millisecond to measure neural processes as they happen
E: led to enhanced understanding of cognitive function eg attention, perception and memory
L: useful in allowing investigations of deficits in these areas eg memory impairements - helps to diagnose
H: only detect neural activity in brain regions close to scalp - not deeper brain structures - restricts usefulness detecting areas eg hypothalamus
ERPS AO3 cost effective
EEG and ERP cheaper than other techniques eg fMRI
Can be used by smaller universities + hospitals - democratising neuroscience researcher to more diverse participant samples - increases generalisability and validity
L: greater volume of research to be conducted - more studies carried out
H: not always standardised - different experimental designs , difficult to replicate
(Time consuming averaging- hundreds of different graphs )