1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Randomized control
The standard against which other designs are compared
All subjects are equally likely to be assigned to the intervention or control
Non-randomized concurrent
Controls are subjects treated without the new intervention at approximately the same time as the intervention group is treated
E.g., comparison of survival rates of patients treated at two institutions– one using the control treatment and the other using the intervention
Historical controls
A new intervention is used in a series of subjects; results are compared to the outcome in a previous series of comparable subjects
The design is non-randomized and non-concurrent
Cross-over design
This is a special form of a randomized control trial that has appeal to biomedical researchers
Allows each patient to serve as their own control
In a typical two period design, each patient will receive either intervention or control (A or B) in the first period and the alternative in the succeeding period
The order in which A or B are given to the patient is randomized
Approximately half of the patients receive the intervention in the sequence AB and the other half in BA
Withdrawal studies
Patients are taken off the intervention or have the dose reduced; the objective is to assess the response to discontinuation or reduction
May be validly used to evaluate the duration of benefit of an intervention which is already known to be useful
Useful in assessing the efficacy of an intervention that has never conclusively been shown to be beneficial
Factorial designs
Attempts to evaluate two interventions compared to control in a single experiment
Group allocation
Also called composite randomization design
A clinic or community is randomized to a particular intervention or control
Has been used where there was difficulty in approaching subjects about the idea of randomization
Unit of comparison is groups instead of the individual patient
Hybrid designs
Combining two types of designs
Common one: historical control + randomized design
Not efficient and difficult to conduct