1/11
Flashcards covering key terms and concepts from lecture notes on Legal Positivism and John Austin's Command Theory of Law.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Legal Positivism
The idea that only what is stated by political authority is law, which is separate from morality and has certainty as its primary ideal.
Three Main Positivists
Hans Kelsen, Hart, and John Austin.
Law as It Is vs. Law as It Ought to Be
A central distinction made by John Austin, who viewed natural law theory as law as it ought to be and insisted on studying law as it is through analytical jurisprudence.
Analytical Jurisprudence
A general jurisprudence that seeks a universal concept of law applicable to all legal systems, requiring a comparative attitude as encouraged by Bentham.
John Austin
An English lawyer and pupil of Jeremy Bentham who developed the command theory of law and sought to study jurisprudence scientifically.
Command Theory of Law
John Austin's theory stating that laws are fundamentally a series of commands and orders given by superiors to inferiors.
Command
An imperative expression of a wish or desire by a rational being, which is inseparably connected to duty and sanction.
Superiority
Defined in Austin's theory as might, or the power of affecting others with evil and forcing them through fears to forge their conduct according to the superior subject's wishes.
Inseparable Connection in Command Theory
The principle that command, duty, and sanction are tied together, meaning there is no sanction without command and no duty without command.
Legal Authority
Authority based on the capacity to enforce behavior using power and force, where morality is irrelevant and law does not have to be just.
Criticism of Command Theory
The argument that not all laws are commands (e.g., laws granting rights) and not all duties carry sanctions (e.g., the duty to be faithful in matrimony).
Reductionistic, Monistic Legal Positivism
An approach to jurisprudence that attempts to provide a scientific account of abstract notions by reducing norms and legal concepts to facts.