1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Advantages of in vitro studies in cancer research
Underlying mechanisms
short duration
inexpensive
controlled conditions
toxic concentrations
Disadvantages of in vitro studies in cancer research
not normal cells
limited number of compounds
metabolism lacking
Advantages of animal studies in cancer research
Underlying mechanisms
Tumor development
Controlled conditions
Toxic concentrations
Disadvantages of animal studies in cancer research
Metabolism differs
Not part of rodent diet
No human dietary pattern
Problem in all observational studies
Causality: Causality is the relationship between an event (the cause) and a second event (the effect) where the first event is responsible for producing the second
Sometimes links will be made that are not related (correlation is not causation)
Reverse causation: a logical error where you assume that variable X causes variable Y, when the true causal relationship actually runs in reverse, with Y causing X
Confounding: the observed association between an exposure and outcome is caused by a third factor that is not part of the biological pathway
Two types of observational studies?
Cohort: ask if exposed or not and compare incidence
Case-control: ask diseased/non-diseased their prior exposure

Design of a case-control study

Problem in case-control studies
Recall bias
Not being able to recall correctly or lying
Selection bias, not representative cases & controls
Non-response depending on exposure (if you are smoking you might be less likely to participate)
Reverse causality: chicken or egg
Design of a prospective cohort study

How is relative risk calculated?

Limitations of chort studies
Large studies, depending on occurrence of disease
Long follow-up, depending on time to cancer diagnosis, possible loss of participants (selection bias)
Misclassification of intake (information bias)
Within cohort range of intake may be limited
Diets are not constant over time, repeated measurements
Advantages of observational studies
Real life situation
Long duration
Disease endpoints
Specific compounds, foods and diets
Also unhealthy
Design of a randomized controlled trial (intervention study)

Advantages of RCTs
Controlled conditions
Confounding minimalized
Cause-effect
Specific compounds, foods and diets
Disadvantages of RCTs
Only âhealthyâ foods due to ethics
Labor intensive, expensive
Intermediate endpoints
Lack of compliance
Short duration
Timing of exposure
Double blinded
The evidence pyramid


How to understand forest plot in Meta-Analysis

Heterogeneity
the results or methods of the different studies vary significantly more than what you would expect by pure random chance alone
To explain heterogeneity you can attempt to organize studies by country or by types of breast cancer
When is evidence convincing
Strong and unlikely to change in future
no unexplained heterogeneity
At least 2 independent cohort studies
Good quality studies that account for error
Dose response
Robust evidence from laboratory studies
When is evidence probable?
No unexplained heterogeneity
At least 2 independent cohort or 5 case-control studies
Good quality studies that account for error
Dose response
Plausible evidenc efrom laboratory studies
What is the largest risk factor for most types cancer?
Overweight, especially the fat surrounding the organs
For which cancer is diet the most important in decreasing the risk?
For colorectal cancer, large bowel is exposed to everything we eat.
What are the possible mechanisms behind body fatness and cancer?
The body fat around the organs is increasing inflammation. It increases insulin resistance and all kinds of hormone changes

Effect of increase in physical activity
Reduces the risk of:
Colon cancer
Breast cancer
Endometrium cancer
Consumption of âfast foodsâ and other processed foods
= high in fat, starches or sugars
Should be limited
To control calorie intake and maintain a healthy weight.
Ultraprocessed foods
Hard to define, not based on calories but on processing
Ultra-processed foods: foods that contain ingredients you wouldnât normally use at home, with additives like preservatives, sweeteners and artificial colors and stabilizers. Often with long shelf life, e.g. ice cream, sausages, crisps, fizzy drinks and instant soups
However, there are also ultraprocessed foods that are good for you like vegetarian burgers. Therefore not all ultraprocessed food causes cancer.

Is microwaving carcinogenic?
No
However, often foods (like ready to eat meal) that you microwave are high in sugar, fat, salt, etc.
Which IS carcinogenic
What cancer risks are reduced by the consumption of fruits and vegetables?
Mouth
Pharynx
Larynx
Lung (fruits)
The reason why is not clear.
Effect of dietary fibre on⌠cancer
Decreases the risk of colorectal - strong evidence!
Mechanism of dietary fibre and colorectal cancer
Formation of short chain fatty acids by bacteria, e.g. butyrate reduces proliferation and induces apoptosis
Reduction of transit time. Reduces the contact between the intestinal content and the mucosa
Reduction of insuline resistance?
Fibre-rich foods are important sources of phytoesterogens?
Can eating be replaced with supplements?
In a study with 30000 heavy smokers, the half who was given beta carotene supplements had a higher risk of cancer
Shows that there is a safe intake, not too much not too little.
Therefore it is important to consider dosage, combination of compounds and timing.
Therefore, do not use supplements for cancer prevention!
Consumers vs nutritions on what increases the risk of cancer

In the future
There should be guidelines on dairy products, coffee, ultra-processed foods, vegetarian diets
Future research
Low/middle income countries really need to be researched as the incidences of breast, prostate and colorectum cancer is increasing in Africa
