Research Methods: Sampling, Experimental Designs, and Multivariate Correlations

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/58

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering sampling techniques, experimental designs, threats to internal validity, and multivariate correlational models (longitudinal designs, multiple regression, moderation, and mediation).

59 Terms

1
New cards

Population of Interest

The entire group of individuals or cases to which a research theory, hypothesis, or conclusion is intended to apply.

2
New cards

Sample

The subset of individuals selected from the population of interest who are actually observed or participate in a study.

3
New cards

External Validity

An indicator of how well the results of a study generalize to other people, settings, contexts, real-life situations, or studies conducted by other researchers.

4
New cards

Random Sampling

A probability sampling approach where every member of the population of interest has a known and generally equal chance of being selected, which supports high representativeness.

5
New cards

Simple Random Sampling

A basic probability sampling method where the researcher identifies the entire population of interest and randomly selects participants, such as by using a random-number generator.

6
New cards

Systematic Sampling

A probability sampling technique where a researcher calculates a sampling interval kk by dividing the population size by the desired sample size, then selects every kthk\text{th} individual from a list.

7
New cards

Cluster Sampling

A probability sampling method in which naturally occurring groups (clusters) within a population are identified, a subset of those clusters is randomly selected, and every individual in the selected clusters is recruited.

8
New cards

Multistage Sampling

A probability sampling method that begins by randomly selecting clusters from a population, followed by an additional stage of randomly sampling individuals from within each selected cluster.

9
New cards

Stratified Random Sampling

A probability sampling method where the researcher identifies demographic subgroups (strata) and randomly samples individuals within each subgroup so that the sample's proportions match those in the population.

10
New cards

Oversampling

A probability sampling technique where a researcher intentionally recruits a larger proportion of a rare or underrepresented subgroup than exists in the population to ensure sufficient sample size for analysis.

11
New cards

Convenience Sampling

A non-probability sampling method that recruits individuals who are readily and practically accessible, such as through campus flyers, participant pools (e.g., SONA), or online crowdsourcing platforms.

12
New cards

Purposive Sampling

A non-probability convenience sampling technique that specifically targets a particular group of people relevant to the study's research question (e.g., recruiting from an addiction treatment center).

13
New cards

Quota Sampling

A non-probability sampling technique where a researcher identifies target subgroup proportions and uses convenience sampling until the preset quota for each category is filled.

14
New cards

Snowball Sampling

A non-probability sampling technique where existing study participants are asked to recruit additional participants from their own social networks, such as friends, family members, or classmates.

15
New cards

Self-Selection Bias

A sampling bias that occurs when individuals choose whether to opt into a study, resulting in a sample that differs systematically in relevant characteristics from individuals who decline to participate.

16
New cards

Non-Response Problem

A sampling challenge that occurs when individuals selected for a study fail to respond or complete it, potentially introducing bias if responders differ systematically from non-responders.

17
New cards

Statistical Power

The ability of a study to detect an effect or relationship between variables when one truly exists, which generally increases as sample size increases.

18
New cards

Independent Variable (IV)

The variable that is manipulated by the researcher in an experiment to test its causal influence on an outcome.

19
New cards

Dependent Variable (DV)

The outcome variable measured by the researcher to determine whether it changes as a function of the manipulated independent variable.

20
New cards

Experimental Control

The practice of holding all variables constant across conditions except for the manipulated independent variable.

21
New cards

Random Assignment

The experimental procedure of allocating participants to conditions purely by chance (e.g., coin flip or random-number generator) to distribute individual differences equally across groups.

22
New cards

Covariance

The first criterion for establishing a causal claim, demonstrating that the independent variable and dependent variable are statistically associated or related.

23
New cards

Temporal Precedence

The second criterion for establishing a causal claim, requiring that the cause (independent variable) occurs or is manipulated before the outcome (dependent variable) is measured.

24
New cards

Internal Validity

The third criterion for establishing a causal claim, reflecting the degree to which a study design successfully rules out plausible alternative explanations and confounds.

25
New cards

Confound

An extraneous variable that is related to the dependent variable and varies systematically with the levels of the independent variable, undermining internal validity.

26
New cards

Noise Variable

An extraneous variable or outlier that may relate to the dependent variable but varies unsystematically across conditions, reducing statistical power without threatening internal validity.

27
New cards

Selection Effect

A threat to internal validity in independent-groups designs where participants choose their condition or are assigned non-randomly, creating systematic group differences on participant characteristics.

28
New cards

Matched-Groups Design

An experimental assignment method where participants are measured on a relevant variable, paired with a similar participant, and randomly split between conditions to equalize the groups on that variable.

29
New cards

Independent-Groups Design

An experimental design (also termed between-groups) in which each participant is exposed to only one condition or level of the independent variable.

30
New cards

Within-Groups Design

An experimental design in which every participant is exposed to all levels or conditions of the independent variable, allowing each participant to serve as their own control.

31
New cards

Repeated-Measures Within-Groups Design

A within-groups design where participants complete one condition, have the dependent variable measured, and subsequently complete the other condition followed by another dependent variable measurement.

32
New cards

Concurrent-Measures Within-Groups Design

A within-groups design in which participants are exposed to all levels of the independent variable at the same time, followed by a single measurement of preference or behavior.

33
New cards

Order Effects

A threat to internal validity in within-groups designs where the sequence of conditions influences participant responses, encompassing carryover effects, fatigue effects, and practice effects.

34
New cards

Counterbalancing

A control procedure in within-groups designs where the presentation order of experimental conditions is randomized or varied across participants to neutralize order effects.

35
New cards

Manipulation Check

An extra dependent measure administered after a manipulation to verify whether the experimental manipulation effectively altered the intended psychological construct.

36
New cards

Demand Characteristics

Cues or features of an experiment that allow participants to deduce the study's hypotheses, leading them to alter their behavior to fit perceived expectations.

37
New cards

Placebo Effect

A phenomenon in which participants show genuine improvement simply because they believe they are receiving a valid, active treatment.

38
New cards

Maturation Threat

An internal validity threat in single-group pretest–posttest designs where observed changes in the dependent variable occur simply due to natural biological or psychological development over time.

39
New cards

History Threat

An internal validity threat in pretest–posttest studies where an external event occurring between test points influences participants' responses, confounding the effect of the manipulation.

40
New cards

Regression to the Mean

A statistical phenomenon whereby participants who score extremely high or extremely low at an initial measurement point tend naturally to score closer to the average on retesting.

41
New cards

Attrition Threat

An internal validity threat occurring when participants drop out of a study, especially problematic when those dropping out have extreme pretest scores or differ systematically from those who remain.

42
New cards

Testing Threat

An internal validity threat where taking a pretest influences participant performance on a subsequent post-test because participants remember answers or become sensitized to the measure.

43
New cards

Instrumentation Threat

An internal validity threat that arises when the measurement tool, observational criteria, or coders change or drift from pretest to posttest, creating an apparent difference in scores.

44
New cards

Longitudinal Design

A multivariate correlational design that measures the same variables across multiple time points in the same individuals to investigate temporal precedence.

45
New cards

Cross-Sectional Correlation

A correlation in a longitudinal design that evaluates the association between two distinct variables measured at the exact same point in time.

46
New cards

Autocorrelation

A correlation in a longitudinal design that measures the association of a variable with itself across two different time points, reflecting the variable's stability over time.

47
New cards

Cross-Lagged Correlation

A correlation in a longitudinal study that examines the relationship between an earlier measurement of one variable and a later measurement of another variable to help assess temporal precedence.

48
New cards

Bidirectional Relationship

A mutually reinforcing association in a longitudinal design where both cross-lagged correlations between two variables over time are statistically significant (p<0.05p < 0.05).

49
New cards

Multiple Regression

A statistical analysis that evaluates the relationship between a predictor variable and an outcome while statistically controlling for one or more measured third variables (covariates).

50
New cards

Beta (\beta)

A standardized statistical coefficient in multiple regression that describes the strength and direction of the relationship between a predictor and an outcome while holding all other predictors constant.

51
New cards

Moderation

A multivariate correlational phenomenon where the strength or direction of the relationship between a predictor and an outcome variable depends on the level of a third variable (the moderator).

52
New cards

Mediation

A multivariate correlational model that tests the underlying theoretical mechanism or causal chain explaining why a predictor variable is related to an outcome variable.

53
New cards

Total Effect (Path C)

In a mediation analysis, the overall bivariate relationship between the predictor and the outcome before accounting for the mediator.

54
New cards

Indirect Effect (Path AB)

In a mediation analysis, the pathway through which the predictor influences the outcome via the mediator, conceptually calculated as Path A×Path BA \times \text{Path } B.

55
New cards

Direct Effect (Path C')

In a mediation analysis, the remaining relationship between the predictor and the outcome after statistically controlling for the mediator (C′=C−ABC' = C - AB).

56
New cards

Proportion Mediated

The fraction of the total effect explained by the mediator in a mediation model, calculated as the indirect effect divided by the total effect (ABC\frac{AB}{C}).

57
New cards

Complete Mediation

A mediation outcome where the proportion mediated meets or exceeds the course threshold of 80%80\% (0.800.80), indicating that the mediator accounts for almost all of the predictor–outcome relationship.

58
New cards

Partial Mediation

A mediation outcome where the proportion mediated is below 80%80\% (0.800.80), indicating the mediator explains part of the relationship but other mechanisms likely exist.

59
New cards

Shared Method Variance

A factor affecting correlations where assessing both the predictor and outcome with the same measurement format (e.g., self-report questionnaires) artificially inflates their correlation.