1/93
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Random evolutionary mechanisms
Mutation
Gene flow
Genetics drift
What could happen if 2 species interbreed?
Reinforcement of prezygotic isolation
Hybrid speciation
Stable hybrid zones
Would a graph with % survival plotted against body size provide evidence for the fitness postulate of Darwin’s 4 postulates of natural selection? If so, would it be direct or indirect evidence?
Yes, it would suggest that fitness varies in association with a certain trait
Indirect, as survival rate is just a proxy for fitness (aka reproductive success). It would be considered direct if # of offspring were on the Y axis rather than % survival
What data could be used to support Darwin’s postulate stating that phenotype varies between individuals?
A graph displaying the frequencies of certain variations of a trait
A graph showing how the average value for a trait changes over time
What data could be used to support Darwin’s postulate stating that phenotypic variation is heritable?
Values calculated with the breeders equation
Data or figures comparing the traits of parents to their offspring (e.g., bird graph showing sons plumage brightness score plotted against that of the father)
What data could be used to support Darwin’s postulate stating that phenotype varies and is associated with fitness?
A graph showing values for a trait plotted against % survival or # offspring
Darwin’s postulate stating that a phenotype must be heritable for natural selectio to occur mainly refers to ______-sense herirability
narrow
Fitness
Reproductive success
Phenotypic plasticity
Ability of a single genotype to produce different phenotypes (physical traits, behaviour, or physiological states) in response to environmental conditions
Fecundity
The potential of an organism to produce offspring
Nonrandom evolutionary mechanisms
Selection (natural and sexual)
Natural selection
Traits that promote survival and reproduction become more frequent in species from one generation to the next
What does reproductive success depend on?
Phenotype and environment
Darwin’s 4 falsifiable postulates (aka the prerequisites of natural selection)
The phenotypic trait varies
The trait is heritable
Variation of fitness
The variation in fitness must be linked to the variation in phenotype (reproduction is nonrandom)
Typical effect of artificial selection on fitness in wild settings
Decreased
We might like dogs with fucked up noses so we selectively breed them, but they can’t even breathe so
Is reproduction random or nonrandom?
Nonrandom
Are populations always variable? How do you know?
Yes
If it were not for a difference in fitness based on phenotypic variation, we would be overrun by elephants
Broad sense heritability
Proportion of phenotypic differences that can be attributed to genetics (encompassing all aspects of genetics) as opposed to environmental factors
H2 = VG / (VE + VG)
Narrow sense heritability
Proportion of phenotypic differences that can be attributed to specifically additive alleles as opposed to other genetic factors or environmental factors
h2=VA/(VE+VA+VD+VI)
Selection for a dominant allele
Allele rapidly increases in population
Doesn’t fix
Selection for a recessive allele
The allele slowly increases in the population at first, then speeds up
Becomes fixed in the population
Selection for a heterozygote
Aa has higher fitness than AA or aa
Results in balancing selection, which maintains both alleles in the population (no fixation)
Selection for homozygotes
One type of homozygote has higher fitness than heterozygotes and the other homozygote → directional selection, leading to fixation of the beneficial allele
Both types of homozygotes have higher fitness than the heterozygote → disruptive selection
Sexual selection
Type of natural selection
Acts on an organisms ability to mate
Causes different traits to evolve in males and females (sexual dimorphism)
Differences between sexual selection (1) and natural selection (2)
One focuses on being well adapted to the environment for survival (2), and one focuses on being well adapted to successfully mate, regardless of if those traits aid in survival (1)
1 includes 2 subtypes: intrasexual (mate choice) and intersexual (mate competition) selection
Sexual dimorphism
When males and females of a species exhibit different phenotypes, aside from their reproductive organs
Pros of sexual reproduction
Increases genetic diversity through recombination
Can combine beneficial mutations faster
Faster evolution
Prevents harmful alleles from fixing, as they can be separated from beneficial alleles through recombination
Cons of sexual reproduction
Fewer offspring and slower than asexual reproduction
Can take significant energy to find a mate
STIs
Many points of failure
Reproductive strategies when metabolic cost is high
Being selective when picking mates
This only increases fitness when mating selectively is able to almost guarantee fertilization
Reproductive strategies when metabolic cost is low
Mating as often and with as many mates as possible
Producing many itty bitty gametes
Intrasexual selection
Selection of traits that allow individuals to compete with their own sex for mates
The sex that is strongly sexually selected will be competetive
Reproductive success limited by access to mates
Intersexual selection
Individuals of one sex selecting mates based on their characteristics
The sex that is weakly sexually selected will be picky (about choosing mates)
Reproductive success is limited by resources rather than mates
_____ tend to exhibit greater variance in reproductive success
Males
Or whichever sex contributes less metabolically to reproduction
Traits that can increase fitness through competition
Size and strength in physical contest situations
Also sneaking, sperm competition, or infanticide in can be adopted by smaller individuals
Which sex tends to exhibit greater variance in reproductive success?
Usually males
The sex with a lower metabolic cost to reproduction, which often must compete with others for mates
Some individuals are chosen as mates frequently, and some not at all
How does phenotypic variation in a male trait and female preference drive linkage?
When females prefer specific traits in males, they mate with males with those traits
This makes it likely that their offspring will inherit alleles for both the female preference AND male trait
Over time, these alleles are likely to become more closely physically linked due to nonrandom mating
Does assortative mating necessarily lead to evolution?
NO
Mating with individuals with similar phenotypes will change the distributions of alleles, but not their overall frequencies
Might increase homozygosity
What type or selection (directional, disruptive, stabilizing) will occur if the mean display matches the mean preference (in the context of females likely colourful male birds, for example)?
Stabilizing
Effect of female choice on female fitness
Increases fitness of females
Choosing better mates results in more successful offspring who are more likely to survive and reproduce
What happens if selective choice limits maximum reproduction (being too picky about mates)?
Results in selective pressure to reduce choosiness
Assortative mating
When individuals tend to mate with those who are phenotypically similar to themselves
Doesn’t change allele frequencies overall in population
Trade-off between natural and sexual selection
Being flashy might get you bitches, but it can also get you killed by predators
Even if you die, the higher chance of reproducing before that happens is often worth it (to an extent)
Traits that decrease survival may still be selected since they increase reproductive fitness
How does female preference evolve?
Eggs have a high metabolic cost and females typically spend more energy on care for offspring → able to produce relatively few offspring → those offspring had better have a high chance of being healthy so they are able to pass on her genes → spend your eggs carefully on mates who have a good chance of producing viable offspring → females with preference for higher quality mates will have higher fitness, and the alleles that caused that will increase in the population
Runaway selection
Selection for traits in males that impress the females but impede their survival (e.g., being bright coloured, which allows them to be seen more easily by predators)
Adaptive advantage of choosing honest signals of quality
High quality genes are secured for their offspring
The “high quality” mate may be better at providing resources for the offspring and mother
Does male display actually reflect genetic quality?
Sometimes
E.g., larger repertoire of songs is associated with immunocompetence in some birds, as is the vibrancy of red pigment
The 4 species concepts
Ecological
Morphological
Phylogenetic
Biological
All models of speciation start with some mechanism to prevent ____ ____
Gene flow
Allopatric speciation
Speciation caused by geographical barriers/physical separation of populations of a species
Sympatric speciation
Speciation caused by other barriers while the populations of the species live in the same geographical area
E.g., different mating rituals or times, mechanical separation, ADD MORE
Pre-zygotic isolation mechanisms
Occur before fertilization
Spatial isolation
Temporal isolation
Behavioural isolation
Mechanical isolation
Gametic incompatibility
Post-zygotic isolation mechanisms
Zygote is inviable, does not survive to infancy
Offspring produced is sterile
Ecological definition of species
Groups organisms based on exploiting a common set of resources, having the same range or environments they tolerate, and dealing with the same predators and parasites
Bacteria, archaea, and asexual eukaryotes cant WAIT IS THIS A TYPO SLIDE 8.2 SPECIES CONCEPTS
Morphological definition of species
Groups/sorts organisms based on distinguishing features
Applies to both asexually and sexually reproducing organisms, as well as their fossils
Doesn’t take physiology, behaviour, or ecology into account
Could overlook cryptic species
Phylogenetic definition of species
Species are based on monophyletic groups, must contain ALL known ancestors of one common ancestor
Species=smallest monophyletic group
Biological definition of species
Considered different species if they cannot interbreed to produce viable offspring
This definition can’t apply to asexually reproducing organisms, fossils, or geographically separated populations
General lineage species concept
A species is a metapopulation that is evolutionarily independent of other metapopulations
Metapopulation=collection of populations with sufficient gene flow between them to exclude evolutionary independence (divergence)
When is the biological species concept not valid?
When it comes to organisms that reproduce asexually
The three steps of speciation
Isolation (block gene flow)
Trait divergence through independent evolution
Reproductive isolation caused by significant divergence (when two newly separate species come into contact, they can't mate)
Reproductive barriers
Includes both prezygotic and postzygotic barriers
E.g., finding a mate: timing, pollinators, and courtship rituals
Mutation as an isolating mechanism
Even a single point mutation can impact mating
E.g., a point mutation in Japanese snails can cause “righted-handedness,” preventing them from mating with “left-handed” snails
Polyploidy as an isolating mechanism
Polyploid individuals cant produce ofdspeing with diploids
Common in plants
Causes instant reproductive isolation
Ecomorphs
A local group of organisms that may not be related ro eachother, but share the same ecological niche, morphology, and behaviours
Example of convergent evolution
Reinforcement of prezygotic isolation
Evolutionary process where prezygotic barriers between two species are strengthened through natural selection
Occurs when hybrids are inviable, have low fitness, or are sterile. Producing these offspring wastes energy and lowers the reproductive success of the parents, so it is selected against
Females from sympatric populations lay _____ (more/less) eggs from heterospecific crosses (WHAT DOES THIS MEAN BRO)
Less
Obviously if they’re sympatric and different species, there must be physical/mechanical or behavioural barriers that caused speciation by preventing interbreedint
But if they live in different locations (allopatric), it’s possible that the only barrier is being far apart location-wise, making them more likely to lay eggs when they’re brought together
How can post-zygotic isolating mechanisms result in the natural selection of for prezygotic isolating mechanisms?
Individuals who produce hybrid offspring will have lower reproductive fitness since their offspring will be dead/sterile
Individuals who evolve to mainly mate with their own species will have more successful offspring and therefore higher reproductive fitness
Traits that prevent mating with other species altogether can be naturally selected
Homologous traits
Traits in different species that share similar underlying anatomical structures or embryonic origin because they were inherited from a common ancestor
Function can change between species and they adapt to their different environments
Display of divergent evolution
E.g., whale flipper and human arm
Analogous traits
Multiple species sharing similar structures with similar functions
Evolved these similar structures separately; did not inherit them from a common ancestor with the trait
Display of convergent evolution
E.g., bird wing and insect wing
Convergent evolution
When two organisms are not closely related but share similar traits
Can occur when two different species adapt to similar environments in similar ways, gaining the same traits independently (homoplasy)
Divergent evolution
When 2 individuals are closely related but have different traits
Can occur when closely related organisms evolve under different selective pressures (e.g., one can access smaller seeds and one can access larger, harder seeds or nuts, so they evolve different beaks despite still being very closely related)
Derived traits
A new, modified trait that evolved in a recent common ancestor
Only present in a small clade
Very useful in phylogeny for determining new clades and showing close relationships
Ancestral traits
Inherited from distant common ancestor
Shared widely across many groups
Not super useful in phylogeny for determining close, recent relationships since so many groups have had the trait for so long
Anisogamy
Different sizes of gametes produced by females vs. males
Eggs tend to be far larger than sperm
Operational sex ratio (male or female biased)
The ratio of sexually active males to sexually active females that are ready to mate
Can predict the intensity and direction of sexual selection
The sex with the larger number of sexually active individuals will be competitive in finding a mate, while the other sex is a limited resource
Result of sexual conflict
Causes rapid evolution of genes related to reproduction
Can eventually cause reproductive isolation and the formarion of new species
In severe cases, can drive down the population (potentially leading to extinction), particularly when male harassment and harm deplete female resources and reproductive capacity
Sexual conflict
Refers to when the reproductive interests of males and females diverge
An adaptation that benefits one sex decreases the fitness of the other
Cryptic species
Species that look nearly identical and may live in the same location, but do not mate due to other barriers
Can result from sympatric or allopatric speciation
Can cause the Wahlund effect
E.g., the 4 species of giraffe (allopatric example)
Synapomorphy
A derived trait that is shared by 2 or more taxa and was inherited from their recent common ancestor
Very useful for determing relationships and lineages; is the core tool of cladistics
Autopomorphy
A derived trait that is unique to a single taxon on species
Does not help determine relationships since it’s not common to other groups
Outgroup
A known group of relatives that falls outside of the “ingroup,” while being pretty closely related to the ingroup
Acts as baseline to help root the phylogenetic tree
Ingroup
Set of taxa (species or group) of interest
Homoplasy
Trait found in 2 or more species that are not closely related and did not inherit the trait from a common ancestor
Opposite of homology
Often results from convergent evolution (though can also be caused by evolutionary reversal)
Parsimony
The simplest and most direct explanation is likely the correct one
E.g., the path in phylogeny that requires the least amount of gaining and losing traits is the most likely
Exaptations
Evolutionary process where a trait takes on a different function that differs from its original evolutionary purpose
Monophyletic group
Ancestor plus all of its descendants
Paraphyletic
Includes a common ancestor and some, but not all, of its descendents
Polyphyletic
Includes several unrelated organisms from different evolutionary organisms, and excludes their last common ancestor
Pleiotropy
A single gene influences multiple distinct and seemingly unrelated phenotypic traits
Bateman's principle
States that the variability of reproductive success is greater in males than females
Vicariance
Restriction of gene flow by geographic barrier
How can outgroups be used to understand phylogenetic relationships?
They can serve as a reference point to understand evolutionary relationships
Helps determine whether a trait is ancestral or derived
Helps identify synapomorpies
Hepp confirm if the ingroup forms a monophyletic group
Allopolyploidy
An organism that has two or more sets of chromosomes from different species
Selection coefficient
Used to compare the relative fitness disadvantage of a genotype compared to a standard reference genotype
s = 1 - w, where w is the relative fitness of a genotype
Ranges from 0 to 1
Runaway selection is a form of (intrasexual / intersexual) selection
Intersexual