1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Jones & Harris (1960s)
Assigned essay study - readers assumed an essay writer truly held the pro or anti Castro view even when told the position was assigned - first demonstration of the fundamental attribution error
Ross et al. (1970s)
Quiz game study - observers rated question writers as smarter than contestants and missed the advantage of writing your own questions - fundamental attribution error
Chen et al. (2006)
Culture and "if only" thoughts study - additive counterfactuals (regrets of inaction) outnumbered subtractive ones in both countries and Chinese students had more subtractive counterfactuals especially about schoolwork and family - counterfactual thinking
Levin & Gaeth (1980s)
Lean vs. fat beef study - "75% lean" was rated better than "25% fat" - positive vs. negative framing
Higgins et al. (1970s)
Adventurous vs. reckless Donald study - people primed with positive or negative trait words judged ambiguous Donald to match the prime - schemas affect construal (priming)
Nosek Greenwald & Banaji (2000s)
Age IAT - faster responses for old + bad than old + good revealed an implicit preference for young over old - Implicit Association Test
LaPiere (1930s)
Road trip and restaurant survey study - a Chinese couple was refused service at only 1 of about 250 places but about 90% later said they would refuse - attitudes poorly predict behavior
Festinger & Carlsmith
Paid to lie study ($1 vs. $20) - people paid $1 to call a boring task fun later liked it more because $1 was insufficient justification - induced compliance and cognitive dissonance
Zanna & Cooper (1970s)
Fake pill study - people told a pill would make them tense blamed it for their arousal and didn't change their attitude while the "relaxed" pill group changed most - arousal is real and its interpretation matters
Wells & Petty (1980s)
Head nodding study - people who nodded while hearing editorials agreed more than people who shook their heads - embodied cognition and self-perception
Petty Cacioppo & Goldman (1980s)
Senior comprehensive exam study - with high personal relevance argument strength persuaded and with low relevance source expertise persuaded - elaboration likelihood model
McAlister & Bargh (2016)
Kids and cereal ads study - children 3 to 6 who cared were swayed by argument strength and unexpectedly by attractiveness too and kids liked advertised products overall - ELM in children
Wells et al. (1980s)
Confident eyewitness study - jurors judged eyewitness credibility by how confident the witness seemed - source certainty
Leventhal et al. (1960s)
Lung cancer film study - a scary surgery film plus a how-to-quit pamphlet cut smoking the most - fear appeals work best with concrete instructions