1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
chomsky vs macswan pov of bilingual cogn processes
chomsky: duplicated language route
macswan: adaption model to provide for code switching
code switching: what underlies it? is it always same mechanisms?
systematic mechanism from underlying grammar
how can indirect measures be targeted in code-switching studies
thru EEG scans, get electrical activity
benefits & cons of EEG scans
non-invasive, high temporal
cons: tedious set up, low spatial
N400 effect for EEG scans on code switching
represent semantic processing difference — represent effortful process in code-switching
P600/LPC singificance code switching studies
morpho-syntactic processing, represent cognitive control
overall conclusions from habitual vs non habitual code switchers
habitual show LPC effects, but no N400 (code switching not effortful),
non-habitual show P600/LPC & N400 effect— code switching is effortful for trhem
do bilingual code switchers exhibit inhibtiory cogn control advantages?
yes— perform better on stroop tasks/cogn tasks
what did gosselin find abt relationship btwn how ecologically valid samples r processed & how methodlogical approaches r processed
processed similarly— both r good measures for testing, balance is fine