Water Resources Economics and Policy Midterm #1 Policies

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/10

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:26 AM on 10/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

11 Terms

1
New cards

Newlands Reclamation Act (1902)

Established the Bureau of Reclamation; led to the expansion of dams and canals; allowed for expanded agriculture

2
New cards

Prior Appropriation Doctrine

“First in time, first in right;” usufructory system; seniority; rights are quantified; beneficial use; forfeiture

3
New cards

Wyoming v. Colorado (1922)

Established Prior Appropriation Doctrine as an official system; Wyoming claimed they were there first and Colorado was harming their access to water

4
New cards

What is a usufructory system?

One where the state retains and owns the water, but the individuals have a right to use that water

5
New cards

Merritt v. Parker (1795)

Established that a landowner has a legal right against unreasonable interference in the natural flow of water (water use has to be reasonable)

6
New cards

The Daniel Ball (1870)

Established that anything is navigable if it is “navigable in fact” (using any customary watercraft mode of travel)

7
New cards

Riparian Doctrine

Property owners adjacent to a waterway; usufruct; no seniority; water use has to be reasonable relative to other riparian users (key aspects: navigable + reasonable use)

8
New cards

Colorado River Compact (1922)

First inter-state water agreement in the U.S.; divides the basin into an upper and lower basin, each allocated 7.5 maf

9
New cards

Equitable Apportionment

How the SCOTUS resolves interstate water disputes; balances sovereign interests and equities of each state to achieve maximum benefit with minimal injury

10
New cards

Who bears the burden of proof in equitable apportionment?

The complaining state must provide clear and convincing evidence of substantial injury

11
New cards

Kansas v. Colorado (1907)

Established that the SCOTUS can use the Doctrine of Equitable Apportionment to resolve interstate water disputes (vs. using one state’s system over the other)