1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Cause 1 of Wyatt’s Rebellion
Fear of England becoming re-catholicised
Proposed marriage to Phillip of Spain
Leaders of the rebellion
Sir Thomas Wyatt
Sir Peter Careew
Sir James Croft
Duke of Suffolk
Cause 2 of Wyatt’s Rebellion
France feared a Habsburg king of England
Increase Habsburg influence, surrounding France
Plan for Wyatt’s Rebellion
3 rebellions happening simultaneously
Midlands, West Country and Kent
Confuse English government
Foreign Support for Wyatt’s Rebellion
French navy would blockade English Channel
Eighty Ships - Habsburg's unable to help Mary
Event 1 of Wyatt’s Rebellion
Wyatt raised 4,000 men in Kent
Proximity to London worried Government
Duke of Norfolk sent to confront Wyatt
This collapsed - 500 government troops deserted to his cause
Norfolk retreated to London
Event 2 of Wyatt’s Rebellion
Wyatt delayed his advance + gave the city time to organise defences
Attempted to cross Thames thwarted - bridged deliberately damaged to stop this
Event 3 of Wyatt’s Rebellion
Wyatt crossed Thames
Attempted to enter London via Ludgate
Heavily fortified
Narrow streets allowed government to encircle his forces
Consequence 1 of Wyatt’s Rebellion
Wyatt sent to Tower of London
Rebels who weren’t killed, arrested
Authorities had to use local churches - prisons filled
Consequence 2 of Wyatt’s Rebellion
480 convicted + 90 executed
600 pardoned
Wyatt + Duke of Suffolk executed
LJG + Guildford Dudley executed
Why was LJG executed?
Paranoia - removal of existing claimant
Rebellion exacerbated this
LJG not to become a figurehead
LJG’s father involved in rebellion - Duke of Suffolk
Consequence 3 of Wyatt’s Rebellion
Uprisings in Midlands and West Country - failure
Few people gave Carew support needed - Suffolk raised force of 140 men
Loyal to the Queen
Why did the rebellion fail?
Poor co-ordination - two uprisings failed due to spy networks
Poor planning during Rebellion - Wyatt delayed advance
Lack of widespread support
Strength of monarchy
How dangerous was Wyatt’s rebellion - Yes
Yes:
Wyatt raised 4,000 men in Kent - an unusually substantial force for a Tudor rebellion
His proximity to London caused considerable alarm within the government
500 government troops deserted to Wyatt - suggesting that the government's control was not completely secure
Had he entered London with his army, the political situation could have become considerably more dangerous
How dangerous was Wyatt’s rebellion - No
Simultaneous risings in the Midlands, West Country and Kent failed to materialise effectively
Wyatt's army failed to attract the level of popular support necessary to overwhelm Mary's government.
His delay outside London was particularly damaging because it gave the government time to strengthen the city's defences.
Once the bridges were destroyed and Londoners remained loyal to Mary, Wyatt's route into the capital became extremely difficult.