Global Sport Business Environment

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/22

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:46 PM on 10/2/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

23 Terms

1
New cards

Robertson (1992) definition of globalisation

‘Compression of the world’

2
New cards

Maguire et al. (2002) definition of globalisation

‘Network of inderdependencies’

3
New cards

Little and Green (2009) definition of globalisation

‘Accelerated movement of ideas, capital, people…'‘

4
New cards

internationalisation

doing more business across borders

  • home market stays the centre

  • exploring an unchanged product

  • country-by-country expansion

  • reversible - you can withdraw


5
New cards

globalisation

the border stops organising the business

  • product designed for global audience

  • integrated, simultaneous markets

  • structural - hard to unwind


6
New cards

Maguire et al. (2002) 5 global flows

  1. economic

  2. political

  3. media / technology

  4. migration

  5. cultural


7
New cards

economic flow - Maguire et al. (2002)

movement of money and investment within global sport

e.g. player salaries, sponsorship, ownership

8
New cards

political flows - Maguire et al. (2002)

use of sport by countries and governments to gain international recognition and influence - soft power

9
New cards

media / technology flows - Maguire et al. (2002)

movement of sports content, information and technology across the world

10
New cards

migration flow - Maguire et al. (2002)

movements of athletes, coaches and sporting professionals between countries

11
New cards

cultural flows - Maguire et al. (2002)

movement of sporting cultures, traditions, values, fashion and lifestyles between countries

12
New cards

Millers et al. (2001) 5 processes of globalisation

  1. globalisation

  2. governmentalisation

  3. americanisation

  4. televisualisation

  5. commodification


13
New cards

globalisation - Millers et al. (2001)

increasing connection and interaction between countries through sport

14
New cards

governmentalisation - Millers et al. (2001)

increasing involvement of governments and political organisations in sport

15
New cards

americanisation - Millers et al. (2001)

spread of American sporting styles, practices, business models and commercial approaches into other countries

16
New cards

televisualisation - Millers et al. (2001)

increasing influence of television and broadcasting on how sport is organised, presented and consumed

17
New cards

commodification - Millers et al. (2001)

process of turning sport into a commercial product product that can be bought, sold and exchanged for financial profit

18
New cards

homogenisation

sport markets become more similar

e.g. standardised global marketing strategies used for global audiences

19
New cards

heterogenisation

sport markets remain or become different - globalisation does not make every market identical

e.g. organisations need to adapt marketing to local cultures

20
New cards

core nations

powerful, wealthy countries with greater influence over global sport

e.g. more money, media rights, technology and decision-making

21
New cards

peripheral nations

countries with less economic and institutional power in the global sport system

e.g. consume sports produced by core nations without having same influence over how global sport is organised

22
New cards

winners of globalisation

  • international sport reaches news audiences

  • global sponsors gain access to new markets

  • athletes gain greater international exposure

  • fans get access to more international sport

  • emerging markets can attract greater investment and events


23
New cards

losers of globalisation

  • smaller sports can struggle to compete with globally dominant sports

  • local clubs lose audiences to major international competitions

  • smaller organisations have less control over global sport

  • commercialisation can prioritise sports with bigger global audiences, creating inequalities