1/123
Looks like no tags are added yet.
adversarial process
lawyers for each side represent their clients’ best interests in presenting evidence
inquisitorial process
judge takes active role in investigating case and examining evidence
jurisdiction
range of a court’s authority
limited jurisdiction courts
misdemeanors, traffic, small claims, some felonies
general jurisdiction courts
felonies, major civil cases, some misdemeanors
appellate courts
don’t try criminal cases, hear appeals/errors from lower courts
problem solving courts
drug courts, DV courts, mental health courts, etc.
adjudicator
stays neutral, rules on motions + sentences
negotiator
referee, oversees talks on plea bargains, sentences, bails
administrator
manages staff, complex schedules, caseloads + budgets
partisan election
election in which candidate openly affiliated with political parties are presented to voters
nonpartisan election
election in which candidates’ party affiliations aren’t listed on the ballot
merit selection
judges are nominated by a committee and appointed by governor for given period. After term, voters approve/disapprove judge for next term
prosecuting attorney
brings criminal charges on behalf of state, can be DA, states attorney, etc.
US attorney
prosecute crimes that violate laws of the U.S. Are appointed by president and assigned to U.S district court jurisdiction
state attorney general
chief legal officer of a state, responsible for civil and criminal matters
trial counsel for police
take crime-fighter stance, believe they should reflect views of law enforcement in court
house counsel for police
give legal advice so arrests stand up in court
rep. of the court
enforce rules of due process to ensure police act according to the law
elected official
most responsive to public opinions, worried about political impact
count
each separate offense a person is accused of in indictment
discovery
prosecutor’s pretrial disclosure to defense of facts + evidence
nolle prosequi
prosecutor announcing they are dropping certain charges
accusatory process
series of events from arrest to filing of a charge
defense attorney
represents accused defendants + convicted offenders
assigned counsel
attorney in private practice assigned to indigent defendants by court, fee is paid by government
contract counsel
attorney in private practice who contracts with government to represent all indigent defendants in a county during a period of time
public defender
full time attorney, salaried, by public org. to represent indigent people
local legal culture
norms shared by members of court as to how cases should be handled and how people should behave
going rate
local court officials’ shared view of appropriate sentence for offense, defendant’s past, etc.
continuance
adjournment of scheduled case until later date
work group
group of people who work together, establish roles, etc.
hunch
not enough to stop anyone, at bottom of ladder of proof
reasonable suspicion
cannot arrest with this, think crime is going to happen, specific facts that crime may be afoot, allows stop and frisk, second on ladder of proof
probable cause
can arrest with this, facts that make it likely a crime happened or evidence is there, allows arrest or search warrant, third on ladder of proof
beyond a reasonable doubt
the highest standard, needed for a conviction (courts, not police), highest on ladder of proof
arrest
taking a person into custody, requires probable cause
plain view
evidence in open sight, where officer is legally allowed to be, can be seized without warrant
deadly force
rarely used, police can’t shoot unarmed non-dangerous fleeing suspect
how do police get a warrant? (due process system)
gather facts (tips, observations, evidence)
swear an affidavit (sworn statement that facts are true)
judge reviews (do the facts add to probable cause)
warrant issued (names the specific place, person, or items)
what are ways to search without a warrant?
special needs (border crossings, airport security)
stop + frisk (pat down for weapons on reasonable suspicion)
incident to arrest (search the person/area within reach during lawful arrest)
exigent circumstances (an emergency: danger, hot pursuit, evidence about to be destroyed)
consent (the person voluntarily says yes/no)
automobiles (with probable cause, since the vehicle could drive away)
5th amendment
protects people from coercion and violence by police and keeps system legitimate, no compelled self-incrimination
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
law enforcement officers must inform suspects of their constitutional rights before questioning them while in police custody
Miranda warnings
you have the right to remain silent
anything you say can/will be used against you
you have right to attorney
if you can’t afford one, it will be provided
exclusionary rule
evidence obtained illegally can’t be used in court
search
inspection of a person, vehicle, home, or property by a police officer to look for evidence
seizure
taking of physical property or evidence by police
reasonable expectation of privacy
legal test that determines whether a search or surveillance violates a person's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. If a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy for a place or thing, the police need a warrant or reasonable cause to search it.
stop
a brief, temporary stop of a person by police based on reasonable suspicion that they are involved in criminal activity, involves asking questions, checking ID etc.
affidavit
a written statement of facts that a person voluntarily signs and swears to be true under oath before court
warrant
an official court order signed by a judge that authorizes law enforcement to make an arrest, search a location, or seize property
open fields doctrine
police do not need a warrant to search unoccupied or undeveloped property outside a home's immediate surroundings, because citizens have no reasonable expectation of privacy in open fields.
search incident to a lawful arrest
a legal exception to the warrant requirement that allows police officers to search an arrested person and the area within their immediate control without a warrant, usually done because they fear evidence will be destroyed or to protect officer from potential weapons (requires physical arrest FIRST)
exigent circumstances
can be done BEFORE arrest, police can conduct a search or entry without a warrant because taking the time to get one would endanger public safety, risk the destruction of evidence, or allow a suspect to escape
consent search
a search conducted lawfully because the individual gave their consent
custodial interrogation
questioning of a suspect by law enforcement after the suspect has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of their freedom of action in a significant way.
public safety exception
allows law enforcement to question a suspect in custody before reading their Miranda rights if there is an immediate, urgent threat to public safety like a time bomb
fruit of the poisonous tree
any evidence obtained through illegal police conduct (the "tree") is also tainted and cannot be used in court (the "fruit")
good faith exception
evidence obtained with an invalid warrant can still be used in court if the police officers reasonably believed the warrant was valid and acted in good faith
inevitable discovery exception
evidence obtained illegally can still be used in court if prosecutors can prove that police would have eventually found it anyway through lawful means
dual court system
division of courts into the federal court system and the individual state court systems
arraignment
court appearance of an accused person in which the charges are read and the accused pleads guilty/not guilty
motion
application to a court requesting that an order be issued to bring about a specific action
bail
an amount of money, specified by judge, to be paid as a condition of a pretrial release to ensure person will appear in court
citation
a written order/summons, issued by a law enforcement officer, directing an alleged offender to appear in court at a specific time
release on recognizance (RoR)
pretrial release granted on defendants promise to appear in court because judge believes that defendant’s ties to community guarantee they will disappear
percentage bail
defendants may deposit a % (usually 10%) of the full bail with the court. Full amount of bail is required if defendant doesn’t appear
preventive detention
holding defendant for trial because they are viewed as threat to community if released on bail
bench trials
trials conducted by judge who acts as a fact finder, determines issues of law, and renders a verdict
jury
a panel of citizens selected according to law and sworn to determine matters of fact in a criminal case
voir dire
a questioning of prospective jurors to screen out people that may be biased
challenge for cause
removal of a prospective juror by showing that they have some bias or other legal disability (unlimited)
peremptory challenge
removal of a prospective juror without giving a reason (limited)
real evidence
physical evidence, such as a weapon, records, etc.
demonstrative evidence
evidence that isn’t based on witness testimony but demonstrates info relevant to the crime like maps, X-rays, etc.
testimony
oral evidence provided by a legally competent witness
direct evidence
eyewitness accounts
circumstantial evidence
evidence provided by a witness from which a jury must infer a fact, (Ex. DNA)
reasonable doubt
standard used by a jury to decide if the prosecution has provided enough evidence for conviction
appeal
a request to a higher court that it review actions taken in a trial court
habeaus corpus
a writ/judicial order requesting the release of a person being detained in a jail, if judge finds person is being held improperly, writ may be granted
3 things of courts
norm enforcement (enforcing society’s rules for behavior)
dispute processing (settling disagreements over contracts, money, property, injuries)
policy making (top courts set rules, such as how searches happen and how suspects are questioned)
bail agent
private businesses, pay nonrefundable fee, usually 10%, they’ll pay full amount to court
pick their clients and track people who skip court down
U.S. and Philippines use them only
motion
ask court to order a specific action
suppress evidence
confession came without Miranda warnings
compel discovery
see the prosecution’s witnesses/evidence
strategic delay
buy time
bail fund
a nonprofit posts bail for those who can’t
pretrial detention
the practice of holding a defendant in jail after they have been arrested and charged with a crime, but before their trial takes place
plea bargaining
negotiation process where prosecutor offers a defendant a reduced charge or a lighter sentence in exchange for the defendant pleading guilty without going to trial
Alford plea
a guilty plea in criminal court where the defendant maintains their innocence but admits that the prosecution has enough evidence to convict them at trial
trial penalty
harsher sentence a defendant receives if they are found guilty at a trial compared to the lighter sentence they were offered if they had just taken a plea deal
alibi
evidence showing that a defendant was somewhere else when a crime took place, proving it was physically impossible for them to have committed it
affirmative defense
Instead of arguing "I didn't do it," the defendant argues, "I did it, but the law says my actions were justified or excused.
hung jury
jury can’t agree on a verdict, so no decision is ultimately reached. case can be retried without double jeopardy, dismiss charges, or offer plea bargain
retribution
punishment inflicted on a person who has harmed others and so deserves to be punished (focuses on the crime)
general deterrence
punishment of criminals that is intended to be an example to the general public and thereby discourage the commission of offenses
specific deterrence
punishment inflicted on lawbreakers to discourage them from committing future crimes
incapacitation
depriving a lawbreaker of the ability to commit crimes against society, usually by detaining the individual in prison
selective incapacitation
making the best use of expensive and limited prison space by targeting for incarceration those individuals whose incapacitation will do the most to reduce crime in society