1/98
Culture, Evolution, and Society
Genetic Drift
random change in allele frequency overtime due to chance
Alleles drift independently
Genetic Ancestry
Genetic similarities (estimated from SNPs)
understand geographic origins + how humans adapted overtime
neutral measurement because it relies on biological data
Human characteristics with Human dietary breadth
Tools & Technology: we can eat some food that we would otherwise be hard to catch or to digest
Intentional teaching: Young members of the group can practice identifying edible species or using tools effectively, with experts to guide them
Local Culture: We develop norms around eating that help the community maintain a safe and nutritious diet
Behavioral flexibility: We can find food anywhere, we adjust to ecological conditions that affect food options
Communication & Cooperative behavoir:
Methods of obtaining food
Farming crops
Foraging
Herding
Trading
Domestication
Definition: full blown agriculture
Effects food: changing species (deliberately or not) such that they are less able to live in the wild and are more dependent on humans
less adaptive/maladaptive under natural (wild) conditions
traits can change through natural selection or artificial selection
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNPs)
Definition: single change in a base (4-5 million SNPs)
Affects on individuals: genetic diversity
Hypo descent
Definition: one distant ancestor determines classification
Hyper descent
Definition: Ancestry is gradually diluted as “mixing” increases
Recent African Origin hypothesis
Homo sapiens evolved in Africa then migrated across the globe
1) One wave 2MYA homo Erectus left Africa to Eurasia
2) ancestor leave and neanderthals, Denisovans spread through Eurasia around 1MYA
3) Homo sapiens spread into Eurasia around 50,000 years ago
*direct ancestors of Homo sapiens evolved into Homo sapiens
*Homo sapiens started in Western Eurasia/Middle East → migrated and mixed with Neanderthals → went to Southeast Asia/oceania → mixed with Denisovians
Denisovans
An extinct group of archaic humans who lived across Asia from about 200,000 to 30,000 years ago
Types of Racism
Institutionalized
Personally Mediated
Internalized
Nixtamalization
soaking maize in alkaline solution
Farming
moderately productive, predictable environments where diet specialization is not risky (rich flat land between rivers)
*best productive environment and low variablility
Foraging
searching/gathering food → less predictable but productive environments where broad and flexible diet allows adjustment to conditions
*always productive (more time taking than building)
*always something growing
Herding
bringing animals together → predictable but unproductive (cold desert) where animals turn unpalatable grasses into meat & milk
*best when there’s nothing to eat (plant wise) → animals eat what we can’t break down, low variability
Human Ultra socialism
kinship
reciprocity
*Foraging communities
Social problems of foragers
Food sharing in central location (around the fire)
Hunting large game
child rearing
How foragers formed community
Partnerships and gift exchange across camps
trading networks
large scale communal hunts
Altruism
willingness to pay a personal cost to benefit others
Third party punishment
The willingness to punish norm violators may be another evolved cognitive adaptation of humans
ex. union walk out, standing up for injustice
Third party punishment sustainability
increase penalties imposed on non-cooperation
increase the chance that violators of norms will be detected
Christopher Boehm: Reverse dominance hierarchy
Hunter-gatherers use a variety of means to counter attempts to take power, including ostracism and killing
Contemporary Foraging societies
Egalitarian: believe that all people are fundamentally equal and should receive equal rights, treatment, and opportunities
*Partnership + gift exchange
*trading networks
*large scale communal hunts
*indirect reciprocity
*gossip → reputation
*third party punishment → willingness to punish those who violate norms or unwilling to share resources
*can limit individuals power through cooperation coalition
Flat hierarchies
minimal layers/little complexity
Ostracisms
Purposely excluding/banishing someone out of a social group
Leadership
Persuasion
coalition-building
provision of the common good
Hierarchy
rankings
status
power
Complexity
people do different/specialized things and depend on each other
Surplus + social complexity
allows people to specialize in activities other than agriculture (pottery/textiles)
trade
larger + interconnected societies
Early State features
territorially define, independent units
large populations
centralized government
specialized, differentiated institutions
military (defense + conquest)
bureaucracy (tax collection)
state religion (legitimize state rules
social stratification
distinction between rulers + ruled
occupational specialization
three classes (nobility/priests, merchants/artisans, peasants), extensive use of slavery
legitimacy based on common ideology
Darwin evolution
Argued that species change over time by natural selection and that modern species descend from earlier ones (common descent)
Three conditions of natural selection
Variation: traits vary among species
Inheritance: offspring resemble their parents
Difference in reproductive fitness (competition): chance of surviving and reproducing depends on an individuals traits
Gap in Darwin’s theory
Darwin doesn’t know how inheritance works
Hominids
great apes
Hominins
Humans plus ancestors after the split from chimpanzees (6.5MYA)
Homo sapiens
Anatomically modern humans
Archaic Humans
extinct Homo sapiens
What we share with other species (sustain cooperation)
kinship: helping relatives
Reciprocity: returning favors
Mechanisms to sustain large corporations
indirect reciprocity and reputation: help is returned by third parties who know your record
Gossip: spreads reputation information
Prosocial sentiments: fairness, empathy, altruism: willingness
Plato’s theory of form
objects in the real world are copies of som ideal form → there’s an unchanging ideal of any object (species) and that examples in the real world are copies of this Platonic ideal
Jean-Baptiste Larmark
Complexifying force: organisms become more compl ex overtime
Charles Lyell
Uniformitarianism: the natural process that shaped the world in the past are present today
Gradualism: most changes in nature occurred slowly
Thomas Malthus
The struggle for resources → small populations expand rapidly they’ll exhaust their resources
*carrying capacity
Multi regional Hypothesis
Homo Erectus migrates, groups evolve into homo sapiens mostly separately
*Homo erectus left Africa roughly 2 million years ago, different populations across Africa, Europe, and Asia evolved locally and simultaneously into modern Homo sapiens.
Darwins theory of Pangenesis
“gemmules” were supposedly shed by all the different organs and contained the information needed to copy themselves in the offspring
Denisovans
Found in SE Asia + Oceania
→ after Homo sapiens evolved interbred with neanderthals in the middle east
Vittrup Man
3300-3100BCE (5KYA)
was in a Bog (marshy places with moss…anaerobic and acidic)
killed by being hit in the head with a ballot (violent death) → artifact found next to him
found in Vittrup Denmark
DNA suggests that he has a northern ancestry than he was found
stable isotopes in teeth revealed his diet at different
found he was fishing in the north and farmed in Denmark
dental plaque had protein that showed the food he ate (marine + farm)
Abu Hureyra (cite)
foraging to farming on the Euphrates
Sedentary Hunter gatherers (11.5K-10K BP)
early farmers 9.5k to 7k BP
drastic reduction in diversity of plant foods
skeletons show evidence of anemia and malnutrition: reduced growth rate and final height, weak teeth
Big toe bent at a 90degreee angle (women)
on the ground grinding the grains
deformity in the lower back
broken teeth bc broken stone were in the grain from grinding
weaving arose
damaged teeth bc they would run them through their teeth
pottery
cavities rose bc you could cook the grains → sticky releasing starch sticking to peoples teeth
more infant skeletons → higher birth rates but more child mortality
Catalhoyuk
greater front to back street on thigh bone → more walking and running
herding animals across a wider range because local farm animals were decreasing
dry climate
overexploitation of farming lands
unrelated household units → bonds were formed from shared living and labor
human feces found on house grounds→ lived in close contact with the animals
lots of non fatal head trauma
females suffered more
Conflict vs. Functionalist (state development)
Conflict: State emerges out of inequality; mechanism to benefit elites
Functionalist: State emerges to solve societal problems; they are better off with it than without the state
Coefficient of Coincidence (CoC)
observed doubled cross overs/expected double crossovers
If expected is not given to you
r1(recombination frequency of interval 1) x r2 (recombination frequency of interval 2) x N (total number of offspring)
Timeline
250MYA (Rise of Mammals) → 60-80MYA (rise of primates: large brains, color vision+visual acuity; less reliance on smell than other mammals) → 66MYA (Astroid extinction) → 40MYA (old world primate diverges) → 18MYA (Great Ape divergence)→ ^MYA (last common ancestor of humans and chimps)
Java man
2MYA SE Asia indonesia
tchadensis
Skull found in Chad 7MYA
Laetoli Footprints (Luci)
Found in Tanzania 3.7 MYA first discovery of bipedal species/upright walker
Petrous
most DNA preservation
Admixture in Pacific Islands
Polynesians spread eastward (island hopping)
hints of Native American culture within Pacific Islanders
Circumscription
*State development
Robert Gannero: all early states arose of fertile natural land that is delimited by natural barriers
limited fertile land
surrounding it there is a natural barrier [unproductive land] (desert/sea)
then you get population pressure (competition)
warfare (losers can’t leave→become subjects)
Grain hypothesis
*State development
cereal farming
they are able to ration store → extraction + tax collection
Visible, Assessable, Divisible/rationable, determinate growth + simultaneous ripening, storable, transportable
Industrialization
gradual transformation → much faster (200-250 years) [1750-1830]
no clean break btw agrarian and industrial societies
a technological change
triggers major social change
Industrial Revolution
Wave of technological advances and organizational changes starting in BRITAIN I the eighteenth century, which transformed an agrarian and craft based economy into an industrial and commercial economy
An economic change, with social, political and intellectual implications
Two forces lie at the heart of this change: technology and energy
Technology
Improves productivity (how much output you can get with one unit of input)
Culture
scientific ideas of the enlightenment
hard work and patience as values of the Protestant Revolution
Institutions
England was one of the few countries with a constrained state that respected property rights, which encouraged innovation
Luck
European colonize the Americas which provided the resources used to fuel industrialization
Britain takes advantage because it has coal
Implications (Short-run)
Unhealthy work environments and work conditions
Industrial pollution
“smoke plague”
urbanization leads to crowding and transmission of communicable disease
Rising wages increase caloric intake
high infant mortality rate
Implications (Medium to long run)
wages keep on rising
governments begin to introduce public health measures and addresses poor living and working conditions
ending child labor
Demographic transition (theory)
A gradual shift from the high level of fertility and mortality characteristics of agricultural societies to the low levels of fertility and mortality characteristic of industrialized societies
*first described by demographers in the 20s-30s at a time of steep fertility declines in W. Europe and US
Change from DT
global average life expectancy more than doubled
Since the 50’s the global average number of children born per woman has been cut in half, from 5 to 2.5
global population growth ‘exploded’ and is only now setting back to pre 50’s levels
Stage 1: Pre-transition (DT)
birth and death rates are high
little to no ‘natural increase’
Stage 2: Mortality transition (DT)
death rates begin to fall
rapid population growth
Stage 3: Fertility transition (DT)
birth rates sustained decline
population growth begins to slow
Stage 4: post transition (DT)
birth and death rates are low
little to no ‘natural increase’
Is there a stage 5 of DT
some believe that the theory didn’t account for the sustained low fertility and the potential for long term population decline occurring now in dozens of countries
Others argue current trends are just part of the fluctuations around a low level of growth, and fertility will not continue dropping indefinitely
Data for DT
“crude” rates = demographic rates that don’t account for age
fertility rate and life expectancy are calculated Ising life tables (require more data)
DT fast and slow
countries that started DT later also went through it faster
transitions were imported/imposed through rapid interventions in medicine and family planning
these countries may have benefited in learning from early countries experience, but often had little time to adjust to dramatic changes in population size and structure
State Capacity
The ability of the state to effectively implement policies and achieve its goals
protect citizens against internal and external threats
encourage economic activity
High capcity
strong state
allows states to perform more functions
Low capacity
weak state
Legal capcity
ability to enforce rules across the territory
Fiscal capacity
ability to raise tax revenues from the economy to implement policies
Collective capacity
ability to provide public goods like health and education
Information capacity
ability of states to collect and standardize information about the populations and its practices
Public goods
not excludable (clean air)
non rivalrous
Externality (market failure)
situation where the action of one individual either benefits/hurts those around them
Harmful side effects imposed on others without their consent
Beneficial side effects that reward or improve the situation of bystanders
Regulation of monopolies
Natural Monopolies
One company takes over
utilities
Activist functions
To drive, impede, or shape social, political, economic, or environmental change by taking direct action rather than passively discussing problems
State Functions

State scope
State capacity inputs
Public spending, size of bureacrcy, resources at its disposal, education and qualifications of government employees
complications:
such measures partly reflect state capacity and partly state scope
not all states want a large public sector
some input measures, such as # of bureaucrats fail to measure how well bureaucrats do their job ( even if they intend to work at all)
State capacity outputs
Services provided, metrics of performance in different domains, such as education or health
Complications:
Measure based on output may depend on more than state capacity
ex. educational outcomes may depend more on parents income and SES than state intervention
State capacity Procedures
Impartiality of bureaucracy or, conversely measures of dysfunction such as corruption
problems:
procedural measures are base on perceptions, which can be biased
an impartial bureaucracy is not necessarily an effective one
Government effectiveness
A mix of procedural and output measures, which additionally accounts for autonomy the bureaucracy. Also based on perceptions, aggregated from many existing data sources
Age structure in DT
Counterintuitive: Mortality decline initially makes the population larger and younger
Larger: The population is losing fewer people than it did before (subtracting slowly)
Younger: decreases infant and childhood mortality tend to be most dramatic
Mortality decline
Fertility decline kick starts population aging
Later stages of mortality decline also make the population older
But fertility transition plays a key role in the relative proportion of youth vs. elderly
Other patterns with pyramids
Migration
Skewed sex/gender ratios
Migration reflected on pyramids
relative size of the migrant population
selectivity by age/sex/both
Skewed